Please stop giving banking and fraud advice here, most of what you have said is wrong.
If the company can't provide sufficient evidence that the order was fulfilled, the customer wins the chargeback. Consequently, if the company does provide sufficient evidence showing the order was fulfilled (in a timely manner), the customer will not win the chargeback, and no money will be awarded. It's not complicated. Your statement about banks and credit card companies being stingy, is incorrect. Credit card companies want to keep their members happy, so if the evidence is there, the money goes right back into the customer's pocket.
"While Revision is garbage in terms of customer service and actually running a company, they do have a real business that sells real products which means a bank/credit card company probably won't see them as fraudulent"
This is completely untrue, and irrelevant. Real businesses that sell real products commit real fraud. If they take payment and the order is not fulfilled in the amount of time agreed upon when entering that "contract," that is considered fraud, and the card carrier will award the customer their money back. Chargebacks can be filed for services not rendered, merchandise not received, etc. It's the exact same process and the burden is on the merchant to provide evidence to the contrary.
Source: I deal with fraud claims and chargebacks every day.