RubberSoul
Active member
13016739:cobra_commander said:I think the point of my post was that being specific at this time is a bit rash.
I stand by my comment that deserting your unit with intent to seek out and join the enemy would constitute an act of treason.
well in that case we agree on that. my whole point is that those bemoaning the action of getting this guy back on the grounds of his alleged actions are scary in that they want to suspend the protocols of our military on a case by case basis, or when it isnt particularly pleasing to them
joining the enemy is treason. deserting is not. as far as im aware, neither matter at this step in the process as he is officially a US POW and therefore should be retrieved, end of discussion
as i said, after that apparently it is up to the army to decide whether or not he will be charged or tried for anything, so take it up with them, people whining in this thread. though i did read a reporter's quote from an anonymous gov official that "5 years is enough" referring to bergdahl's time spent captive with the taliban maybe being considered time served in a sense
guess we'll see. but for now, people moaning that he is being retrieved by obama are pretty demonstrably wrong and havent been able to make an argument that is compelling for why he should be left there