Diesel trucks

Whats up guys so im looking for thoughts on diesel pick ups. I love them to death but im wondering what others think. specifically powerstroke and duramax
 
2009-chrysler-pt-cruiser_100167773_m.jpg
 
I know nothing worth mentioning about diesel trucks but both those names sound like they should be for condoms.
 
I love big trucks too man. Been waiting for a thread like this! Personally my favorite is Cummins. Same engine for a long time, something tells me they're done right. Also the 7.3 powerstroke is debatebly the best engine. Duramax.. They seem to be good. The injectors go out on the earlyish 2000's ones, so thats not good. Don't like the IFS of the Chevy/GMC though. Personally, I will be driving a dodge one day. Toyota will do for now.
 
if you aint stroking youre cumming.

7.3L powerstroke is regaurded as on of the best diesel engines ever

The Ford 6.0L diesel blows, fun far far away from it.

The Ford 6.4L in the newer trucks is a lot better than the 6.0L, more refined, quieter, easy can match the 7.3Ls power numbers and is almost as reliable as it when you delete some of the emmision and EGR stuff.
 
13562313:BarryMcKociner said:
I love big trucks too man. Been waiting for a thread like this! Personally my favorite is Cummins. Same engine for a long time, something tells me they're done right. Also the 7.3 powerstroke is debatebly the best engine. Duramax.. They seem to be good. The injectors go out on the earlyish 2000's ones, so thats not good. Don't like the IFS of the Chevy/GMC though. Personally, I will be driving a dodge one day. Toyota will do for now.

7.3 is my favorite engine. One reason they stopped producing them is because they lasted too long but the main reason is because ford could not pass emissions.
 
On a real note, when I see nice trucks that aren't totally fucked out with Confederate flags and stuff, its chill. Already said, but 7.3s are insane. My dad had one back in the day and drove it for over 800,000 miles and it still had life left in it. Mostly body damage because of Buffalo winters but the truck ran well and could have easily gone on. but I've seen them get up to 1mil. Same with Cummins. Not sure about duramax's though.
 
I loved my Duramax. The Allison transmission is awesome. While the IFS isn't as durable off road as the solid -axle Dodges and Fords, the ride quality was miles better. Much quieter as well, even in the winter.

I spent a lot of time behind the wheel of 7.3 and 6.0 Powerstrokes, and I still preferred the Duramax.

797000.jpeg
 
Powerstroke and Duramax are extremely limited for space under the hood, typical v8. I prefer cummins because of the bomb proof inline six. Not to mention well written ISB service literature for wrenching.
 
Anyone else stoked on the ram ecodiesel on the 1500? I really wish more smaller trucks had a diesel option. Toyota Tacoma or hilux would be an amazing truck
 
I can say honestly i fucking hate them. Dude they're soon bad for the environment. We're skiers. It should be easy to support the environment. Like unless you neeeeeeeeeed one for work cuz you're carrying heavy shit all day, don't fucking get one!!!!
 
13563499:FrenchFry said:
I can say honestly i fucking hate them. Dude they're soon bad for the environment. We're skiers. It should be easy to support the environment. Like unless you neeeeeeeeeed one for work cuz you're carrying heavy shit all day, don't fucking get one!!!!

Diesel burns a lot cleaner than gas. Check your facts.
 
13563499:FrenchFry said:
I can say honestly i fucking hate them. Dude they're soon bad for the environment. We're skiers. It should be easy to support the environment. Like unless you neeeeeeeeeed one for work cuz you're carrying heavy shit all day, don't fucking get one!!!!

Gtfo you dirty hippie
 
13563499:FrenchFry said:
I can say honestly i fucking hate them. Dude they're soon bad for the environment. We're skiers. It should be easy to support the environment. Like unless you neeeeeeeeeed one for work cuz you're carrying heavy shit all day, don't fucking get one!!!!

Get out. But in all honesty op I would do some research on your own. All you will get on here is personal opinion. Do some research yourself and look on some diesel forums, you will find a lot more solid info than what you will find on a skiing forum.

But you should get a duramax. The best years from what I've heard are the LBZ's which are the 06-07 ones. The LB7's (01-04.5) are known to have injector issues, but aren't a problem if they have been replaced recently. Other ones are LL'Ys Lmm, LML (newer ones). Anyways. Do some research on your own.
 
13563501:SamtheEagle said:
Diesel burns a lot cleaner than gas. Check your facts.

ha. no. diesel burns way dirtier that gas. they're more fuel efficient engines but still pollute more.
 
13563623:VinnieF said:
ha. no. diesel burns way dirtier that gas. they're more fuel efficient engines but still pollute more.

Maybe older trucks but newer diesels produce about 90% less soot and are lower in carbon dioxide and other hydrocarbons compared to gas. Diesel also has a better return in terms of energy invested over energy returned because there is a lot less refining.
 
Diesels are alright, good if you tow all the time, my dad has an F450 with a 7.3 pulls a 785 bobcat like a champ. Honestly not sure why people buy them as daily drivers though, they blow chunks in the bush. Prefer having a gas for daily driving.
 
13563678:SamtheEagle said:
Maybe older trucks but newer diesels produce about 90% less soot and are lower in carbon dioxide and other hydrocarbons compared to gas. Diesel also has a better return in terms of energy invested over energy returned because there is a lot less refining.

Don't forget about NOx emissions. Besides particulate matter, that is the main problem child in diesel exhaust. But like you said, the newer ones have definitely improved in that category.

To to the guy who started this environmental thing, if you want to get mad at something get mad at coal. Its used for the majority of our electricity generation and pollutes the air way worse than a 2015 6.7 Cummins.
 
I personally am not a fullsized truck guy but if I was I'd get the 7.3. Good out of the box. The 6.0 needs to be rebuilt or else it's a ticking time bomb. If you're getting the truck to just roll coal, just get a volkswagen.
 
I have always been a Ford guy. Worked with Dodge all summer and they're nice but I love my power stroke. Picked up a 2010 6.4 250 in August. Not to mention it is a manual. I love it.
 
Its really an opinionated question because there's hardcore brand allegiance. Everyone likes cummins and they really are the best options, except dodges rust alost, especaily in the east. People that like ford and powerstroke genraly despise chevy duramax and vice versa. Overall they are all nice trucks that will run for a really long time if taken care of properly, just go with the one you like the most. (also, don't make it roll coal)
 
13563941:uturn said:
Its really an opinionated question because there's hardcore brand allegiance. Everyone likes cummins and they really are the best options, except dodges rust alost, especaily in the east. People that like ford and powerstroke genraly despise chevy duramax and vice versa. Overall they are all nice trucks that will run for a really long time if taken care of properly, just go with the one you like the most. (also, don't make it roll coal)

I think that the brand allegiance runs past the Diesel engine pushing it. Cummins is great but, the rest of the dodge has been hideous in the past...... but is getting slightly better. GM has the best ride quality always has and has a more luxurious feel to it. Ford, not too sure what they bring to the table, pretty gross just like dodge. but to each their own I guess.
 
13563948:Rusticles said:
I think that the brand allegiance runs past the Diesel engine pushing it. Cummins is great but, the rest of the dodge has been hideous in the past...... but is getting slightly better. GM has the best ride quality always has and has a more luxurious feel to it. Ford, not too sure what they bring to the table, pretty gross just like dodge. but to each their own I guess.

why is it that people who like chevy/GM always have to defend it at every possible chance, and usually do it by trashing all other brands.
 
13563952:uturn said:
why is it that people who like chevy/GM always have to defend it at every possible chance, and usually do it by trashing all other brands.

That's what everybody does about all vehicles. I also said the Cummins is great and the rest of dodge is getting better, let's be honest the interiors were pretty ghetto until recently. I only said GM's are more comfortable/luxurious. didn't say they were the best.
 
13563501:SamtheEagle said:
Diesel burns a lot cleaner than gas. Check your facts.

dude sure it burns cleaner but in a honda civic ir golf you use an eighth or the amount. So that argument is just retarded.
 
5.9 cummins or 7.3 powerstroke.

Get a manual if you can with the 7.3, you'll go through 3-4 auto trannys in the life of the engine. 12v cummins over 24v but the 24v is a nicer ride and newer.

Stay away from the. 6.0 and 6.4 unless the headstuds have been done along with a egr/dpf delete. They can be made into good reliable motors but it's not cheap.

Both the new 6.7 powerstroke and 6.7 cummins look like good motors. I'd go cummins for the manual trans but that's personal preference. Both should have dpf egr deletes done to them, it'll only improve the health and milage of your engine.

Be aware that because of new epa regulations and the equipment installed to pass them the newer diesels are terrible on fuel compared to the old 7.3 and 5.9 (which were in the low 20mpg range.) The 6.4 gets low teens before a dpf/egr delete.

Don't buy a diesel unless you need it. They are big motors designed to haul heavy loads not haul around your groceries.
 
As stated earlier in the thread chevy/gm is the most loaded/comfy but they don't haul as well or as much as dodge and ford
 
13563948:Rusticles said:
I think that the brand allegiance runs past the Diesel engine pushing it. Cummins is great but, the rest of the dodge has been hideous in the past...... but is getting slightly better. GM has the best ride quality always has and has a more luxurious feel to it. Ford, not too sure what they bring to the table, pretty gross just like dodge. but to each their own I guess.

While not diesel's, I have two co-workers with Ram 1500's and one of my good friends has one (all 2014+) and all seem to be working great. I've gone on two 3000-4000km road trips in my friends truck and it's been flawless with pretty solid fuel mileage considering it's a truck.

If I had to get a truck (that wasn't a Toyota) right now, it'd probably go with a Dodge.
 
13564066:CrotchKiller said:
5.9 cummins or 7.3 powerstroke.

Get a manual if you can with the 7.3, you'll go through 3-4 auto trannys in the life of the engine. 12v cummins over 24v but the 24v is a nicer ride and newer.

Stay away from the. 6.0 and 6.4 unless the headstuds have been done along with a egr/dpf delete. They can be made into good reliable motors but it's not cheap.

Both the new 6.7 powerstroke and 6.7 cummins look like good motors. I'd go cummins for the manual trans but that's personal preference. Both should have dpf egr deletes done to them, it'll only improve the health and milage of your engine.

Be aware that because of new epa regulations and the equipment installed to pass them the newer diesels are terrible on fuel compared to the old 7.3 and 5.9 (which were in the low 20mpg range.) The 6.4 gets low teens before a dpf/egr delete.

Don't buy a diesel unless you need it. They are big motors designed to haul heavy loads not haul around your groceries.

I test drove 2011 6.7 Cummins with the 6 speed and it got about 12-13 mpg. That's awful haha, but I did hear they are doing better once the DEF system was added. It was nice and if you have the money to feed that/need it, I would highly recommend one. Everything in the late model Ram HDs are a substantial upgrade over the old.

Replace the dual mass flywheel and clutch though. That is it's weakness besides for the egr fucking up your engine eventually.
 
13564074:saskskier said:
While not diesel's, I have two co-workers with Ram 1500's and one of my good friends has one (all 2014+) and all seem to be working great. I've gone on two 3000-4000km road trips in my friends truck and it's been flawless with pretty solid fuel mileage considering it's a truck.

If I had to get a truck (that wasn't a Toyota) right now, it'd probably go with a Dodge.

yeah, the newer ones have much nicer interiors than in the past and the half-tons are a hell of a lot smoother for obvious reasons. I think all the half-tons are pretty good, just preference. I like the dodge half tons, but I'm partial to the GM's. I've had my 07 denali for 260k without many problems, also had 3/4 ton gas work trucks in the bush, they held up well for the amount of abuse they took.

A good buddy of mine has a 2010 1 ton dually diesel full load, paid $70k, thing didn't even have automatic climate control or backup sensors. interior is pretty meh. He also was getting horrible mileage so he tried to chip it, made it worse. He eventually took it to a diesel performance shop, and they chipped it and removed some sensors and shit, now the thing halls ass and gets 17L/100km pulling 4 place sled trailer at 130k/hour haha.
 
My friend has the new ram 2500 diesel and the back seat reclines. Fuckin clutch for road trips. I like the older gms but the newer ones ate buttass ugly. hate the super wide and tall front end. Not to mention i dislike that they sit lower (or at least look like it). But besides the looks theyre good trucks.
 
13564062:FrenchFry said:
dude sure it burns cleaner but in a honda civic ir golf you use an eighth or the amount. So that argument is just retarded.

Cleaner burning can be disputed a lot, but diesels by no means use more than gas. Your average civic/golf sized gas car will get like 20-30 mpg on the highway while the diesel variant will get like 40-50 mpg. A gas truck will get somewhere around 15-20 mpg on the highway and a diesel can be like 20-30+ mpg. And on top of that the gas trucks mileage will get much worse under load than the diesel.

All in all if you really want to do better for the environment, turn off your lights, they are powered by coal.
 
scross.gif


168.jpg
Fucking rednecks nah just kidding I actually want a just a small tundra but global warming al gore skiing fuck diesel
 
We have a couple of F350s at work and we constantly are screwing around with the regen causing the trucks to smoke like a motherfucker. Other than that they have ridiculous power, surprisingly quick for a diesel.
 
13563678:SamtheEagle said:
Maybe older trucks but newer diesels produce about 90% less soot and are lower in carbon dioxide and other hydrocarbons compared to gas. Diesel also has a better return in terms of energy invested over energy returned because there is a lot less refining.

Is your source a VW emissions test?

I can find many saying how much worse diesel is than gas (for instance a study saying how 65% of particulate air pollution in San Francisco is from diesel engines while only 10% of fuel burned in that area is diesel). I can't find any saying they're cleaner than gas. Many saying they've improved markedly, but none saying they're better.
 
13563678:SamtheEagle said:
Maybe older trucks but newer diesels produce about 90% less soot and are lower in carbon dioxide and other hydrocarbons compared to gas. Diesel also has a better return in terms of energy invested over energy returned because there is a lot less refining.

Ah, I found where you're getting confused. No, it doesn't burn cleaner. More emissions per emitted per unit diesel than gas. But, diesel being more efficient means that modern engines can be cleaner per distance driven. They still burn dirtier though.

The 90% figure you had I found and wasn't that they are 90% cleaner than gas but that they are up to 90% cleaner than older diesel engines.
 
13563499:FrenchFry said:
I can say honestly i fucking hate them. Dude they're soon bad for the environment. We're skiers. It should be easy to support the environment. Like unless you neeeeeeeeeed one for work cuz you're carrying heavy shit all day, don't fucking get one!!!!

do you know anything about cars?
 
13564632:DACO-TOG said:
do you know anything about cars?

yes. and driving a truck over a car need to really is that much worse for the environment. there is no debating this.
 
13564062:FrenchFry said:
dude sure it burns cleaner but in a honda civic ir golf you use an eighth or the amount. So that argument is just retarded.

1st off, comparing a sedan to a pickup truck is ridiculous

2nd they make diesel golf's and many of the small cars in europe are diesel

3rd fuel efficient gas pickup gets mid to high teens in mpg, with the right mods a diesel truck can get low twenties city

And lastly if you buy a diesel truck and use it as a civic (to run around town and such) you should just go to hell
 
13564630:VinnieF said:
Ah, I found where you're getting confused. No, it doesn't burn cleaner. More emissions per emitted per unit diesel than gas. But, diesel being more efficient means that modern engines can be cleaner per distance driven. They still burn dirtier though.

The 90% figure you had I found and wasn't that they are 90% cleaner than gas but that they are up to 90% cleaner than older diesel engines.

I think we are on the same page just had different trains of thought on getting there. And ya I did mean the 90% compared to old diesels not has cars. Also someone mentioned NOx emissions which are way worse from diesels than gas. I was tempted to use vw stats haha. That always used to be my go to argument for diesel over hybrids but that didn't work out to well in the long run haha
 
Every car my family owns is a diesel...4 VW and 1 truck. I drive the truck daily. We decided to buy one because when we had to tow things and such we couldn't do it with the VWs. Don't have to often but its nice when you need to. And also being able to put things in the bed. Personally I love driving it as a daily. also love driving the VWs. I get about 19mpg around the city after only taking the DPF filter off.
 
13564647:VinnieF said:
yes. and driving a truck over a car need to really is that much worse for the environment. there is no debating this.

While I agree, a diesel pickup is a drop in the ocean of pollution when compared to tractor trailers. 6mpg and a 13L engine haha
 
been looking at diesels a lot lately. going to go with a 6.6 duramax just because thats what we used at work and we had good luck with them.

I hate going on sled and trucks forums though the brand whoring bullshit that goes on is ridiculous. you type in "my ball joints need replacing" someone will type in immediaiatley after "oh fuck you shoulda bought a (insert other brand of sled or truck) you fucking idiot!" its non stop . finding information or a valid opinion is so hard.
 
if you need one, fine. if you're only getting one cuz it looks cool or as compensation, that's retarded. they destroy the environment.
 
13562324:japanada said:
if you aint stroking youre cumming.

7.3L powerstroke is regaurded as on of the best diesel engines ever

The Ford 6.0L diesel blows, fun far far away from it.

The Ford 6.4L in the newer trucks is a lot better than the 6.0L, more refined, quieter, easy can match the 7.3Ls power numbers and is almost as reliable as it when you delete some of the emmision and EGR stuff.

you really don't know what you're talking about. The 6.4 is one of the most unreliable pieces of shit that ford has ever produced. The 6 was an engine made by international that ford, nor international tested properly resulting in most of their headgaskets exploding. After you rebuild a 6 properly, they're regarded as one of the most bombproof engines around.

international still uses the exact same 6l with a beefed up head (had to be done anyways) in industrial and commercial vehicles, the 6.4 was garbage.
 
13565461:Mod_Dane said:
you really don't know what you're talking about. The 6.4 is one of the most unreliable pieces of shit that ford has ever produced. The 6 was an engine made by international that ford, nor international tested properly resulting in most of their headgaskets exploding. After you rebuild a 6 properly, they're regarded as one of the most bombproof engines around.

international still uses the exact same 6l with a beefed up head (had to be done anyways) in industrial and commercial vehicles, the 6.4 was garbage.

It's more that Ford rushed International to get the 6.0 on the market, than International not testing it properly, but yea you're largely right.

The 6.4 is god awful and that thing gets some of the worst fuel milage out of any diesel pickup.
 
Back
Top