Then have Colbert and Beck after...
anyway,
I liked the above debate. O'Reilly has a way of speaking that is so condescending and arrogant I just want to choke the life out of him. When he drops the fake outrage he can actually be an intellectual person. Stewart is so much more thoughtful and rational any debate would obviously swing his way.
Bill is like religion, he takes a stand on a topic and that is the word of god. It is infallible, unshakeable, and any reversion in principal is impossible. This is what I hate in him. Even when presented with obvious cases of contradiction he ignores them and stays with his initial assessment.
As president, if you have to worry about the specific background of everyone invited to the white house for fear of ridicule it makes your job impossible, sure the buck stops with him, but that is unreasonable to say he condones cop killing by some type of connect the dots bull shit association.