ZOMG! Obama might drill for oil!!!!

skiminnesota

Active member


ST. PETERSBURG, Fla. - Democratic presidential candidate Barack Obama

said Friday he would be willing to support limited additional offshore

oil drilling if that's what it takes to enact a comprehensive policy to

foster fuel-efficient autos and develop alternate energy sources.

ADVERTISEMENT

if(window.yzq_d==null)window.yzq_d=new Object();

window.yzq_d['2T2hAtGDJHk-']='&U=13f9phk51%2fN%3d2T2hAtGDJHk-%2fC%3d674272.12804985.13083877.1442997%2fD%3dLREC%2fB%3d5406809%2fV%3d1';

b


Shifting from his previous opposition to expanded offshore drilling, the Illinois senator told a Florida newspaper he could get behind a compromise with Republicans and oil companies to prevent gridlock over energy.

Republican rival John McCain,

who earlier dropped his opposition to offshore drilling, has been

criticizing Obama on the stump and in broadcast ads for clinging to his

opposition as gasoline prices topped $4 a gallon. Polls indicate these

attacks have helped McCain gain ground on Obama.

"My interest is in making sure we've got the kind of comprehensive

energy policy that can bring down gas prices," Obama said in an

interview with The Palm Beach Post.

"If, in order to get that passed, we have to compromise in terms of

a careful, well thought-out drilling strategy that was carefully

circumscribed to avoid significant environmental damage — I don't want

to be so rigid that we can't get something done."

Asked about Obama's comment, McCain said, "We need oil drilling and

we need it now offshore. He has consistently opposed it. He has opposed

nuclear power. He has opposed reprocessing. He has opposed storage."

The GOP candidate said Obama doesn't have a plan equal to the nation's

energy challenges.

In Congress, both parties have fought bitterly over energy policy

for weeks, with Republicans pressing for more domestic oil drilling and

Democrats railing about oil company profits. Despite hundreds of hours

of House and Senate floor debate, lawmakers will leave Washington for

their five-week summer hiatus this week with an empty tank.

"The Republicans

and the oil companies have been really beating the drums on drilling,"

Obama said in the Post interview. "And so we don't want gridlock. We

want to get something done."

Later, Obama issued a written statement warmly welcoming a proposal

sent to Senate leaders Friday by 10 senators — five from each party.

Their proposal seeks to break the impasse over offshore oil development

and is expected to be examined more closely in September after Congress

returns from its summer recess.

The so-called Gang of 10 plan would lift drilling bans in the eastern Gulf of Mexico

within 50 miles of Florida's beaches and in the South Atlantic off

Virginia, the Carolinas and Georgia, but only if a state agrees to the

oil and gas development along its coast. The states would share in

revenues from oil and gas development.

Drilling bans along the Pacific coast and the Northeast would remain in place under this compromise.

The plan also includes energy initiatives Obama has endorsed. "It

would repeal tax breaks for oil companies so that we can invest

billions in fuel-efficient cars, help our automakers re-tool, and make

a genuine commitment to renewable sources of energy like wind power,

solar power, and the next generation of clean, affordable biofuels,"

Obama noted.

"Like all compromises, it also includes steps that I haven't always

supported," Obama conceded. "I remain skeptical that new offshore

drilling will bring down gas prices in the short-term or significantly

reduce our oil dependence in the long-term, though I do welcome the

establishment of a process that will allow us to make future drilling

decisions based on science and fact."

Nevertheless, Obama said the plan, put forward by mostly moderates and conservatives led by Sens. Kent Conrad, D-N.D., and Saxby Chambliss, R-Ga., "represents a good faith effort at a new bipartisan beginning."

Earlier in the day, Obama pushed for a windfall profits tax to fund

$1,000 emergency rebate checks for consumers besieged by high energy

costs, a counter to McCain's call for more offshore drilling.

The pitch for putting some of the economic burden of $4-a-gallon

gasoline on the oil industry served a dual purpose for Obama: It

allowed him to talk up an economic issue, seen by many as a strength

for Democrats and a weakness for Republicans, and at the same time

respond to criticism from McCain that Obama's opposition to offshore

drilling leads to higher prices at the pump.

In linking McCain to the unpopular President Bush, Obama struck a theme from Ronald Reagan's successful 1980 campaign against President Jimmy Carter

by asking a town-hall audience in St. Petersburg: "Do you think you are

better off than you were four years ago or eight years ago? If you

aren't better off, can you afford another four years?"

Obama primed the crowd by noting new government figures showing

51,000 jobs lost last month and citing 460,000 jobs lost over the last

seven months. He tied other bad economic news from the Bush administration to McCain and offered his energy program as one route to relief.

"This rebate will be enough to offset the increased cost of gas for a

working family over the next four months," Obama said during a two-day

campaign swing in Florida.

"It will be enough to cover the entire increase in your heating bills.

Or you could use the rebate for any of your other bills, or even to pay

down your own debt."

 
"We can follow a policy that doesn’t change whether violence is up

or violence is down, whether the Iraqi government takes responsibility

or not; or we can decide that it’s time to begin a responsible, gradual withdrawal from Iraq."

Barack...



“Here is the truth: fighting a war without end

will not force the Iraqis to take responsibility for their own future.

And fighting in a war without end will not make the American people

safer.

So when I am Commander-in-Chief, I will set a new goal

on day one: I will end this war. Not because politics compels it. Not

because our troops cannot bear the burden- as heavy as it is. But

because it is the right thing to do for our national security, and it

will ultimately make us safer.”

—Barack Obama, Clinton, Fayetteville, North Carolina, March 19, 2008



ObamaConflictingIraqWDs0608.jpg

http://newsbusters.org/blogs/tom-blumer/2008/06/29/yet-another-obama-flip-flop-flagged-time-iraq

 
stupid ass idea. tax the oil companies to pay $1000 to each fam? that just gonna raise gas price b/c if the oil companies pay more in taxes then their just gonna pass that cost onto the consumer
 
Pretty sure that Clinton put down the drilling because he said it wouldn't help for 10 years...he said that in the late 90's so why should we wait some more?

PS- Did anyone hear Obama say that if everyone made sure their tires were properly filled with air gas prices could drop 10%?!?!?!?!? That's it! My God we just thought we were low on oil.
 
Because Obama represents all us liberals... btw, I'm starting to think you just enjoy the feeling of having your panties in a twist around your nuts.
 
I think both parties have strong points, but drilling for oil is not a bad idea. i agree that we should come up with renewable energy and work on it but giving people money for getting free power (wind) instead of helping out the majority of america i think is a bit ignorant. cheaper oil= not the solution but will help temp. because we all need it, food prices are about to sky rocket as an example. inflation will hit the roof. but anyway, obama will totally pwn because bush sucked so bad and all he has to say is I'm trying another approach than the republicans have been.

but im stoked obama is looking into educated drilling. (we need it)
 
how about we dont drill for oil, not screw up the world, and just work on alternative power sources a lot more hardcore than ever before. its not like the second we drill prices instantly drop. itll take years
 
where did i say Obama represents all liberals? really, show me...

can you feel the winds of change?

"take me, to the magic of the moment"
 
Honestly, Obama has been saying that he would compromise with republicans so that we have unity. This is what he was talking about.
 
He's trying to kiss everyones ass at the same time. That's really hard to do. Especially with America today. The asses are HUGE!
 
Obama can do something that Simon Dumont cant, Spin both ways. He wants everything both ways, it all depnds on what group of people he is talking to
 
He isnt dumb, he said he is taking troops out and ending the war, ofcourse it isnt going to be right away thats impossible. Its a plan, not flip flopping.
 
Bingo, in a general sense yes this is what happens when any organization is taxed where there is competition. In a monopolistic competition such as oil companies it will probably just be passed on to consumers as well. But hell, the average American doesnt understand this so lets use this to get more votes because it is more money in our pockets.
 
Exactly. Read carefully and understand what he has been saying. If you have watched Obama debates, you have seen that he doesn't say we were gonna get out of Iraq right away, but getting out is one of his many goals to attain as president of the USA.
 
You could say the same thing about McCain.

Really, practically-speaking their plans for Iraq are the same. McCain says, "We're not leaving until the job is done!" Obama says, "We're leaving as soon as the job is done!" Tomato, tomato...hmmm...that figure of speech doesn't really translate to writing.

 
not really, read the stuff i posted from his website, and direct quotes...

we go from, they will be gone by 16 months, to "gradual withdrawal"

but back on topic... this thread is about him drilling for oil!
 
No, he's said if it takes a 100 years we'll stay there that long. But he's also said that he envisions us out of Iraq by the end of his first term (if he were elected).

 
Funny how the Obama campaign just two weeks ago had commercials running saying that McCain was part of the energy problem, because he was in favor (at the time) of off-shore drilling and just utilizing domestic supplies, while Obama had a bright plan because it involved none of that.

Hmmmm....
 
no wonder our economy is going into the shitter because dumbasses waste days on end making stupid youtube videos about the candidates. Instead they could be actually working at a job that does somethng beneficial. And the only people dumber than the people who make the videos are the ones who believe every word and repeat it to people.

(i am not just talking about this video but all of them)
 
did anyone see his latest ad? (obama)

trying to paint McCain as in bed with the oil company's...

what about rising above the attack ads, and politics of division?
 
I'm interested to see how the Daily Show handles this. I like John Stewart a lot, but the Obama cocksucking has been out of control on his show lately.

 
OK then, from what i read(just the summary at the top)

he says he doesnt support mccains off shore drilling veiws. and then says he would support some off shore drilling " if that's what it takes to enact a comprehensive policy to foster fuel-efficient autos and develop alternate energy sources."

if your trying to say he is flip-flopping, bullshit.
 
Bottom line: a week or two ago, Obama was attacking McCain for advocating offshore drilling. Today, Obama is ok with offshore drilling. That's a flipflop, no way around this.

 
Obama is trying to play the neutral field, more power to him for it.

I'd rather have someone who wants to dig for some skrilla juice, then send more people into war. McCain is a war monger, thank god the senate is democratic and the bill for re-instatement of the draft will never get passed.

I hope Obama wins, he's mah nukka for sure right now.

But yeh I don't agree with drilling for more oil, but I'd much rather have Obama then someone who thinks the answer is sending in more troops vs. a highly planned withdrawl.
 
Back
Top