Y’all think I should get 183 or 177 wets

[Skiblade420]

Actually I’m getting 191 114 sego big horns.



If you see someone killing it at hood this summer it’s definitely probably usually going to be me

 

[Skiblade420]

Anyone wanna go toke with eheath and I

 

[WoFlowz]

Just had to not type that paragraph I was gonna right about how this was the 3rd thread today. Ya got me good one

 

[Skiblade420]

I’m in love with you

Just had to not type that paragraph I was gonna right about how this was the 3rd thread today. Ya got me good one

 

[Brayblade]

Idk if its just me but I really don't enjoy sego skis I'm from Idaho so I really wanted to like my local brand but the skis were just utter shit. I rode the Tot, the cleaver, and the bighorn and all of them were just so unresponsive. It was like skiing an old piece of plywood

 

[Hometownerz]

Idk if its just me but I really don't enjoy sego skis I'm from Idaho so I really wanted to like my local brand but the skis were just utter shit. I rode the Tot, the cleaver, and the bighorn and all of them were just so unresponsive. It was like skiing an old piece of plywood

Idk man, I haven’t ridden any of their cambered skis but the prospects are in my top 3 of anything I’ve been on. Not very responsive but they’re so damp and they just rail super G turns in steep terrain. I’m from WY and I’ve been pleasantly surprised by them. Then again I’ve got a buddy with tater tots and he says they ski like shit. I want to try some bighorns or condors.

 

[SavageBiff]

It’s probably just you, big horns are a dope damp ski

Idk if its just me but I really don't enjoy sego skis I'm from Idaho so I really wanted to like my local brand but the skis were just utter shit. I rode the Tot, the cleaver, and the bighorn and all of them were just so unresponsive. It was like skiing an old piece of plywood

 

[Brayblade]

It’s probably just you, big horns are a dope damp ski

My issue was that they were so damp they were unresponsive

 

[SavageBiff]

Understood.

I prefer easy to ski skis that can still charge, like my yle, nothing wrong with easy to ski skis which is why I’m getting a +10 ullr , basically a yle, I also like bacons and outlines and love heavier damper skis like the b ops, commanders for nukin chop

for me I didn’t find them un responsive , I found the lack of pop to be in responsive, almost, dead, other than that, for such a progressively mounted ski, they are pretty dope in pow, chop, and groomers, not ultra easy like a marksman or similar but still pretty easy to manage, the 106 anyway I never rode the 11? Whatever width it is

My issue was that they were so damp they were unresponsive

 

[Brayblade]

Understood.

I prefer easy to ski skis that can still charge, like my yle, nothing wrong with easy to ski skis which is why I’m getting a +10 ullr , basically a yle, I also like bacons and outlines and love heavier damper skis like the b ops, commanders for nukin chop

for me I didn’t find them un responsive , I found the lack of pop to be in responsive, almost, dead, other than that, for such a progressively mounted ski, they are pretty dope in pow, chop, and groomers, not ultra easy like a marksman or similar but still pretty easy to manage, the 106 anyway I never rode the 11? Whatever width it is

I rode the big horns on a demo day a few years back so i was on demo bindings at the recommended mount which could have made the ski less fun. I have a vivid memory of skiing some soft crud (snowed 3-4 inches the night before and it was skied out at this point) and the skis just feeling like I was holding on for dear life. It felt like they just wouldn't do anything that I wanted. My major complaint was that even when i was turning or speed checking it was really hard to feel how my skis were interacting with the snow. I hadn't had an experience like that with any other skis that day and I rode everything from magnus 102s to dynastar chams (even some stokli race skis). I really wanted to like em but i just had a poor experience with all the skis of theirs that I tried. Hopefully I can ride em again in the future but im not really seeking it out at this point

 

[Skiblade420]

Everyone up in here for real talking about big horns when I was just memeing them

 

[SavageBiff]

I hear ya, not every ski is for everybody no matter how others describe it, I do like a binding with a low stack height, demos aren’t known for that

I rode the big horns on a demo day a few years back so i was on demo bindings at the recommended mount which could have made the ski less fun. I have a vivid memory of skiing some soft crud (snowed 3-4 inches the night before and it was skied out at this point) and the skis just feeling like I was holding on for dear life. It felt like they just wouldn't do anything that I wanted. My major complaint was that even when i was turning or speed checking it was really hard to feel how my skis were interacting with the snow. I hadn't had an experience like that with any other skis that day and I rode everything from magnus 102s to dynastar chams (even some stokli race skis). I really wanted to like em but i just had a poor experience with all the skis of theirs that I tried. Hopefully I can ride em again in the future but im not really seeking it out at this point

 

[TRVP_ANGEL]

sego big horn

 

[AaronO.]

Probably 177

 

[flavourtown]

wets think should get I Y'all I 183 or 177?

-big horn sego

Ararar