How was it more technical? Just because of the switch 270 vs. reg 270? Because Jon's looked flawless, whereas Charles came out of it a bit sketch. Granted, Gagnier threw down more switch stuff, but Jon mixed it up, threw in a bunch of different grabs, and spun both ways. Plus, his 1080 was flawless... I thought Gagnier's was a tad on the hucked side, and he barely got the last 180 around. Watch them again... after about 2 dozen looks at all three runs, I would have put CG in third. It was a good run, but It didn't look as good, or have that much more tech in it than T$'s or Jon's (A fair bit less than Tanner's, really... 450-270?)
I know we're all going to bitch about judging no matter what, but that's just my opinion on that one. Jon always seems to get screwed.
5*****~~~~~~~~~~
F*****~~~~~~~~~~
R*****~~~~~~~~~~
N~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
T~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Current Reigning NS Moron: 'how comes all female tennis players have last names that end in 'ova''
-Snapjibber2008, Member # 12044