i think that dirtyslime or whoever the hell he is made a good point: all a protest would do is just encourage them NOT to hold a slopestyle, NOR anything else if turnout was really low. And he's right about what happened in washington. At snoqualmie Pass, only 2 events are for skiers in a given season, but thats more of a gesture. There are many other comps that they hold, where prizes are well over anything else in the region because they routinely get like 50+ people.
Our best mechanism is a show in numbers. We get the numbers, they can have the justification for having more events. I would also like to see a slopestyle, but it has to be worth it to them, and more importantly, the sponsors, for it to happen. What incentive do they have putting several thousand dollars and effort into an event and only 4 people show up? What kind of audience does that draw? It is basically a waste. So many of you are so narrow minded that you cannot see what is really necessary for a competition, especially one that is 1) well put together, 2) is fun, and 3) one that has good prizes and cash. Hell, skiers are treading on thin ice in the area because they don't turn out. In the end, some pussification would seem more like an explanation rather than "protest."
And by the way, having a "NS sesh" at timby doesn't really seem like a worthy alternative considering there will be the NS West Coast session in a few weeks, which will vastly exceed anything you guys could conjure up by yourselves. Seize it while you can, otherwise you might be protesting Meadows because they don't have Vegetate (or similar) at all. How fun would that be.