Vail Resorts Aquires Whistler-Blackcomb

13710515:B.Gillis said:
Yah but only if you're mommy and daddy can afford paying an arm and a leg to get you into the sport ... this isn't good long term for skiing at all. Sooner or later new skiers and snowboarders won't even be able to afford lift tickets and once that happens then how can skiing grow or sustain itself?

I agree, it isnt good for the sport at all. New people wont want to get involved if they see that the experience comes with a multi thousand dollar price tag. But skiing is a self regulating industry. If the prices go up, the consumer numbers will go down. Skiing is not a commodity to most so if the prices do go up either more deals will be devised by outside travel companies combining the mountain product with the exterior products like flights etc to draw the punters in, or the big companies will decide to offer more competitive prices earlier on in the season just like Vail do right now. People dont need to go skiing, especially the odd tour group. Those companies know that. Anyway, Vail's share price is going up exponentially right now so there is no reason why they would jack up lift prices, at least for the next few seasons. They are making more money than they know what to do with it.

Unless of course another company like Boyne Resorts starts to monopolise too. They already own around 15 resorts across the states. Then we will have a consumer price war similar to the Australian supermarket price war. Lift ticket price will be driven down by what the consumer sees as the best value. Both companies will start to offer better value and more combination packages. Unfortunately if this occurs, it will be the mountain staff that suffer financially as do the farmers in Australia. Cuts would have to be made. The only cuts that could be made though would be to expendable staff members. Qualified staff members would go elsewhere, so then the issue falls on itself again. Vail would need to offer a more competitive wage to those qualified, meaning it would need to make more money. Lift prices would rise again. Its a self regulating industry. Prices cannot fluctuate drastically with consequences. There are too many factors that play into it to just assume that Vail buying a mountain means higher prices across the board.
 
13710515:B.Gillis said:
Yah but only if you're mommy and daddy can afford paying an arm and a leg to get you into the sport ... this isn't good long term for skiing at all. Sooner or later new skiers and snowboarders won't even be able to afford lift tickets and once that happens then how can skiing grow or sustain itself?

Maybe the unlimited all inclusive epic pass will get more expensive but most likely epic local pass holders will be able to ski at whistler but otherwise people will probably pay the same price for the epic local and get 3-5 days at whistler or something. There will still be deals if you find one.
 
13710552:B.Gillis said:
I just picture a future where the local ski hill becomes extinct at the hands of these super passes. How many of us started skiing at some bunkass little hill because it was the closest and cheapest option? Season after season we see more and more of these little ski hills close their doors for good. Skiing is such a niche sport already as it is and the fact that these gateway ski hills continue to struggle scares me.

If all people in the future have to turn to are these mega resorts/super passes then how many people will just be priced out of the sport forever?

I don't see Vail buying up any mtns in shitty areas like Ohio, Pennsylvania, new York, etc. Where there is a metro area, there will be a market for the classic shitty ski hill that has 300'vert and $40 day passes.

Hell, snoqualmie(outside of alpental) is a classic shitty ski hill geared towards beginners and park skiers. It has a crazy number of guest visuts, largely because it is less than an hour from Seattle, and it is geared towards beginners.

Look, if you want to keep your small hills you gotta let people know how rad it is there. But your booze at their bar, your food at the lodge, and rent out resort owned property one weekend a year. Dirt bags don't keep places in business, so if you bring your own beer and food, have a season pass and get a bunch says in... it's your own damn fault.
 
13710509:californiagrown said:
Won't change the winter ops too much. But it will completely change the summer ops. Yellowjackets telling riders to slow down on a-line, freight train and dirt merchant. Closing trails for slippery conditions, and making everything rollable and mellow. Fences and netting everywhere etc.

Vail hates liability, and the bike park has a whole bunch of trails that leave them open to it.

Are there yellow jackets at vail resorts in the summer currently? I really can't see this happening because the bike park is such a huge draw in the summer where pros train and compete all season long. Vail would catch wayy too much flack from the global community and give business to other BC resorts. I was thinking they'd temporarily bring some whistler staff to Colorado to bring their bike parks there up to par with other area resorts like WP and Sol Vista. Plus, you sign a waiver before you get on the lift at any resort no matter the time of year. Why wouldn't deep-pockets Vail think to hire some good lawyers and write a bulletproof waiver?
 
13710563:TheDoughAbides said:
Are there yellow jackets at vail resorts in the summer currently? I really can't see this happening because the bike park is such a huge draw in the summer where pros train and compete all season long. Vail would catch wayy too much flack from the global community and give business to other BC resorts. I was thinking they'd temporarily bring some whistler staff to Colorado to bring their bike parks there up to par with other area resorts like WP and Sol Vista. Plus, you sign a waiver before you get on the lift at any resort no matter the time of year. Why wouldn't deep-pockets Vail think to hire some good lawyers and write a bulletproof waiver?

A lot of pros train at breck and key during the winter, but they sure have yellow jackets there. no other bike park, especially in the states, comes even remotley close tot he size of the whistler bike park, so it wouldnt make sense to have yellow jackets at those parks. But whistler's park is huge with tons of intersections and high speed areas.

As for the waivers we all sign... yeah, kinda like the ones on the back of your lift ticket... hows that been working out protecting resorts from made up claims of "negligence". haha.

I hope it doesnt happen, but i see the whistler bike park ripe for the dumbing down in the name of safety and lawsuit protection.
 
13710521:Yung_Jimmy said:
Coming from someone who lives on the East Coast, I would give my left testicle to be able to live and ski at any of those resorts. Take a trip over here and then tell me that those resorts are trash.

that's what I thought when I moved from the east coast. I just want my left testicle back.
 
i don't give a shit about the epic pass. vail's resorts kind of suck. id way rather keep the mountain collective especially now that it added revelstoke. vail doesn't have anything that can compare to mammoth, jackson, sqauw and revelstoke. well i guess all the whistler park rats will be stoked they can go to breck, key, and northstar now...
 
13710574:californiagrown said:
A lot of pros train at breck and key during the winter, but they sure have yellow jackets there. no other bike park, especially in the states, comes even remotley close tot he size of the whistler bike park, so it wouldnt make sense to have yellow jackets at those parks. But whistler's park is huge with tons of intersections and high speed areas.

As for the waivers we all sign... yeah, kinda like the ones on the back of your lift ticket... hows that been working out protecting resorts from made up claims of "negligence". haha.

I hope it doesnt happen, but i see the whistler bike park ripe for the dumbing down in the name of safety and lawsuit protection.

I guess you hit the nail on the head when you said that all the pros still train at Key and Breck in the winter. I guess we can conclude that Vail tends to guarantee what is probably the highest standard of snowpark in the world.
 
13710521:Yung_Jimmy said:
Coming from someone who lives on the East Coast, I would give my left testicle to be able to live and ski at any of those resorts. Take a trip over here and then tell me that those resorts are trash.

Meter adjustment is due.
 
13710956:Jibberino said:
I guess you hit the nail on the head when you said that all the pros still train at Key and Breck in the winter. I guess we can conclude that Vail tends to guarantee what is probably the highest standard of snowpark in the world.

How long has Vail had breck and key?
 
13710964:californiagrown said:
How long has Vail had breck and key?

I'm not 100% positive on this, but I don't think they were result of acquisition. I think they were opened under the Vail umbrella originally. I think all of their Colorado resorts were.
 
13710973:CaptainObvious. said:
I'm not 100% positive on this, but I don't think they were result of acquisition. I think they were opened under the Vail umbrella originally. I think all of their Colorado resorts were.

Breck and Key were purchased by vail in 1996, beaver creek was already owned at that time, just wiki'd that.
 
13710509:californiagrown said:
Won't change the winter ops too much. But it will completely change the summer ops. Yellowjackets telling riders to slow down on a-line, freight train and dirt merchant. Closing trails for slippery conditions, and making everything rollable and mellow. Fences and netting everywhere etc.

Vail hates liability, and the bike park has a whole bunch of trails that leave them open to it.

@goatsgulley and the DM creek gap lmao.
 
13710515:B.Gillis said:
Yah but only if you're mommy and daddy can afford paying an arm and a leg to get you into the sport ... this isn't good long term for skiing at all. Sooner or later new skiers and snowboarders won't even be able to afford lift tickets and once that happens then how can skiing grow or sustain itself?

Skiiers who reproduce like to drag their kids to the hill with them and get them into the sport the mountain collective costs 99 dollars for Children and has 2 free days on all the hills. Schools in cold areas offer after school ski programs. Sport is accessible.

The thing abotu Whistler which noone knows is that there is absolutely close to NO east coast people there (not exaggerating you could go a week talking to everyone on the lifts and not talk to another vacationer from east of the mississippi). Obviously there are some and someone who posts on newschoolers and is super into the sport is likely to visit but its not as mainstream as the major American ski destinations. Its Vancouver and Seattle's playground. Lot of people there to just party and not necessarily ski. Crowded on weekend pow days not bad otherwise. Long season. Makes having an epic pass more enticing for sure.

Lets face it there is some very heady off piste chilling at the Epic/Vail Resorts. The other good hills don't have as much in the way of bomb hotel/party set up at the base. Park City is fun, South Lake Tahoe is the tits, Vail is fun and full of hot girls on vacation, and Whistler has the best ski party scene in the world. Being able to ski and visit those places and not pay for lift tickets just prepay months prior is a good deal any way you cut it. Hotel prices not too bad when you don't go at super custy peak times. 17/18 with Whistler sounds good to me hope its only 6-7 bones. This is probably awesome for Vail employees can go to Whistler after your season ends and ski for free.
 
13711480:PeppermillReno said:
Skiiers who reproduce like to drag their kids to the hill with them and get them into the sport the mountain collective costs 99 dollars for Children and has 2 free days on all the hills. Schools in cold areas offer after school ski programs. Sport is accessible.

.

you don't have a fucking clue bud
 
13711556:GORILLAWALLACE said:
you don't have a fucking clue bud

He thinks ski programs are free, and flying all over North America to get 2 days in at each resort is cheap.

I will say, if you live in the area of a hill, it's not more expensive than any club sport.
 
13711571:californiagrown said:
He thinks ski programs are free, and flying all over North America to get 2 days in at each resort is cheap.

I will say, if you live in the area of a hill, it's not more expensive than any club sport.

The point I was making is the sport is not much more expensive than any popular vacation that people fly to. Or a beach summer rental type vacation. Having your kid go with school once a week in the winter is 1-200 bucks.

Its expensive if you never take vacations of course but so is anything.
 
13711576:PeppermillReno said:
The point I was making is the sport is not much more expensive than any popular vacation that people fly to. Or a beach summer rental type vacation. Having your kid go with school once a week in the winter is 1-200 bucks.

Its expensive if you never take vacations of course but so is anything.

$800 a month just for lessons is obscenely expensive. Idk what world you live in haha.

I have no idea why you brought the mountain collective into this- that pass is a shit deal unless you have a lot of disposable income for travel, and have a job that allows you to travel a bunch.

Are you aware that most people don't take $7000 yearly vacations?
 
13711587:californiagrown said:
$800 a month just for lessons is obscenely expensive. Idk what world you live in haha.

I have no idea why you brought the mountain collective into this- that pass is a shit deal unless you have a lot of disposable income for travel, and have a job that allows you to travel a bunch.

Are you aware that most people don't take $7000 yearly vacations?

Its 1-200 for a season for beginner programs that are once a week.

That 7000 vacation can usually be done for 2-3k if you make a compromise here or there.

The industry isn't out of reach for middle class people or families.

Mountain Collective gives 2 free days and half off at the best east coast mountain its worth it just for Stowe. I bought it before Stowe was even on it and my trip to Aspen was discounted b/c of it. Its dope it encourages folks to take heady ass ski trips all mine have been booked within a week of leaving b/c I saw there was gonna be powder.
 
13711593:PeppermillReno said:
Its 1-200 for a season for beginner programs that are once a week.

That 7000 vacation can usually be done for 2-3k if you make a compromise here or there.

The industry isn't out of reach for middle class people or families.

Mountain Collective gives 2 free days and half off at the best east coast mountain its worth it just for Stowe. I bought it before Stowe was even on it and my trip to Aspen was discounted b/c of it. Its dope it encourages folks to take heady ass ski trips all mine have been booked within a week of leaving b/c I saw there was gonna be powder.

Do you have a traditional job, or a family? Those are pretty important factors that need to be taken into account and prohibit being so free with money and time.

And I beg to differ on the season long lessons/club pricing. I've never seen em close to that low.

Also, for the price of the pass +travel and lodging, I'd rather get a couple of cat days up in BC, and ski my home hill all season while having better apre than any resort has, 45 mins away :).

I know that with the cost these days, my family would never have taken my sister and I skiing more than 2 days a year growing up... and my mom grew up in Tahoe, and dad in Denver so they live skiing. We were very middle class too.
 
13710561:californiagrown said:
I don't see Vail buying up any mtns in shitty areas like Ohio, Pennsylvania, new York, etc. Where there is a metro area, there will be a market for the classic shitty ski hill that has 300'vert and $40 day

I see vail adding a couple more resorts to there urban ski area collection. They already have Mt Brighton near Detroit, Afton Alps near Minneapolis & Wilmot Mountain near Chicago & Milwaukee. The 3 major markets in the midwest.

I see them in the future buying another midwest area near a major market city. And something out east.
 
13711880:concept311 said:
I see vail adding a couple more resorts to there urban ski area collection. They already have Mt Brighton near Detroit, Afton Alps near Minneapolis & Wilmot Mountain near Chicago & Milwaukee. The 3 major markets in the midwest.

I see them in the future buying another midwest area near a major market city. And something out east.

VR has an entire group within the company dedicated to seeking out potential urban/metro properties and overseeing their transition into the company.

I would think we see a mid-atlantic property next. NY, PA area is my bet.
 
As someone who already dishes out a ton of cash for the Epic already, I'm short term excited. It's just one more place that I can ski. But in the longterm, its kinda terrifying. Some of the best skiing is the small, low-key resorts and with money hungry vail lurking around, when will those resorts have to just give in?

Scary shit.
 
I've been to vail resorts before. They Suck! It's the type of place people from texas go on Christmas vacation to. None of their resorts even feel like a true ski resort. The employees are shit too. The staff are all beaters and they put more emphasis on their restaurants and spas then they do on their shitty mega resorts. This is not a good thing for whistler in my opinion.
 
13710464:Brocka_Flocka said:
The Colorado Native who wants to go to school at UBC is absolutely stoked on this.

But the Colorado Native who grew up skiing Summit County hates this.

How bout east coast that wants to go UBC?

jk I don't know how I feel about this honestly. I do hope pass prices drop a bit and they keep the park the same. The big question is summer ops like Momentum, COC and the other camps. I wonder how its gonna work out.
 
13711942:nick_candage said:
I've been to vail resorts before. They Suck! It's the type of place people from texas go on Christmas vacation to. None of their resorts even feel like a true ski resort. .

So youve been to all their resorts i assume? or are you just an uneducated loudmouth?
 
13711984:californiagrown said:
So youve been to all their resorts i assume? or are you just an uneducated loudmouth?

I've been to vail, PC, Beaver Creek, Keystone and Breckenridge. The only one that left me feeling ok about spending 150ish dollars was breckenridge. So no i'm not an uneducated loudmouth. I've been to enough to know they simply are disappointing.
 
13712036:nick_candage said:
I've been to vail, PC, Beaver Creek, Keystone and Breckenridge. The only one that left me feeling ok about spending 150ish dollars was breckenridge. So no i'm not an uneducated loudmouth. I've been to enough to know they simply are disappointing.

Lol, so youve been to summit county and are now an expert in everything vail, and all their resorts across the world. Glad we cleared that up haha. Youre not a loudmouth, youre just naive as all hell.
 
13710419:CaptainObvious. said:
.....How? Genuinely I'm asking how they'll ruin whistler. I've skied at a shitload of the Vail resorts and not once felt like they even touched the mountains. Aside from maybe some "Epic" shit on the mountain, like free photo spots, little race courses (also free), and maybe more marketing material to get you to try and buy more shit.

I feel like there is so much "anti-establishment" hate just for the sake of hate. Everyone jumps on the fuck corporate bandwagon without even knowing why they're jumping on the bandwagon besides it being cool.

Why is this not viewed as a move that will introduce stability in smaller resorts and accessibility in larger resorts? The homies up north who fork out their money to get a pass to Whistler now have the option to come to Colorado....Utah....Nevada.....California....Michigan....jesus tittyfucking christ you can ski all over the place and save some nickels (as compared to what it would cost if you wanted to travel a la carte)

I don't. fucking. get it. Besides the lifties bitching because they won't be allowed to smoke week behind the shack anymore.

I know I'm going to get a shitload of hate for saying all that, but whatever. Prove me wrong and make me understand. I'm open.

Ill give you the three common examples I have from my doorstep.

1. Northstar was owned by Booth Creek for years. Same pass got you into Loon/Cranmore, Bear Mountain, Sierra at Tahoe and Snow Summit. Pretty good deal.

Skiing at Northstar back then was kinda cool. It was this funky resort with high speed lifts, a great terrain park, and a bit of a chill vibe. I actually liked it growing up.

Then, holy shit. Vail bought it. Ritz Carlton. Massive new lodges. 20$ beers. Ice rink. parking was moved back another mile. New on hill lodges that would make Trump swoon. The Village expanded to this insane shit. They put in a half pipe and named it after Shaun White even though he never went there anyway, A bunch of long term employees were either let go or told to take a paycut (granted KSL did this at Squaw/Alpine as well, so it's not just vail), hired people to fucking hand out speeding tickets, and what did all of that do? Now the only people who go to Northstar are either square ass Bay Area dingdongs who buy it for the cheap-ish season pass (the cheap pass comes with a zillion blackout dates, but whatever) and don't care about steeps (northstar is nicknamed flatstar for a reason) or families who spend way too much during a 6 day stay, or shitheads who want to tell people at work how cool they are for having gone to Northstar and spent too much for their 6 day trip.

The vibe there is completely changed. It doesn't have the same people working for it, nor the same people going to it. No locals really like it, and the traffic getting in is absurd.

Meanwhile, Heavenly went from a funky in-town resort surrounded by casinos that gave it this strange las vegas dirty vibe that was fuckin cool, and now it's had full 'vailification' to it where all the funk was removed for ritzy glammy bullshit that doesn't add anything to the resort but ambiance, making it seem worth it to the jonesy people that their money was well spent.

Kirkwood has somewhat stemmed away from the Vail Resorts thing because they haven't hardcore invested in it quite yet. It's still feeling like it should, steep, kickass resort with the most pow in the region, and arguably the best terrain, but expect in time that Vail will ruin the town of Kirkwood, buy up the whole lot of everything there, charge way too much, tear up the funky in liu of ritzy, and make it some gaudy place like it does to everywhere it touches. Kirkwood's employees were hurt horribly by that acquisition from what I understand, and it made it a bit less attractive as a place to work, so they bus in extra heavenly employees now and again to make up for the fact that it's too expensive to live in Kirkwood when you make min wage, and Vail's employee housing deals are a joke.

Sierra at Tahoe, which was split from its northern brother Northstar @ Tahoe (which has now been renamed Northstar California - what the fuck is that about?) has actually benefitted from Northstar leaving it seems. It's still owned by Booth Creek, still has some funk to it, still gets shitloads of locals, the pass is like 300 dollars with no blackout dates. it gets shitloads of snow and has some great terrain. I'd buy a Sierra pass over an Epic pass any fuckin day at that rate, and forego the glizy fuckshit and focus on the shredding of pows.

Vail Resorts is like the asshole in monopoly who keeps hitting 200 on go right from the start and keeps buying up all the shit before anybody else can, then somehow puts fucking hotels on everything.

Is it how you win the game? Yes... but nobody else has fun.
 
Vail Resorts is like the asshole in monopoly who keeps hitting 200 on go right from the start and keeps buying up all the shit before anybody else can, then somehow puts fucking hotels on everything.

Is it how you win the game? Yes... but nobody else has fun.
 
Vail Resorts is like the asshole in monopoly who keeps hitting 200 on go right from the start and keeps buying up all the shit before anybody else can, then somehow puts fucking hotels on everything.

Is it how you win the game? Yes... but nobody else has fun.
 
13712055:californiagrown said:
Lol, so youve been to summit county and are now an expert in everything vail, and all their resorts across the world. Glad we cleared that up haha. Youre not a loudmouth, youre just naive as all hell.

Ok' so what resort that vail owns do you really enjoy because I must be extremely naive since i've been to 5 vail resorts in colorado and utah and A-basin and loveland and the aspen resorts are wayyy better and every mountain in Utah is better than PC so I truly do think that they suck and now that they own whistler they'll jack up prices on everything put speed control everywhere turn free parking into paid parking install 10 new 5 star luxury resorts they'll also put down a couple tubing hills and some more zip lines and the resort will now cater to tourists more than the people that have been skiing there for seasons. So how do you think that this is a good thing that a company that only cares about how much money they can milk off of a resort now owns one of the best resorts in north america?
 
13712113:nick_candage said:
Ok' so what resort that vail owns do you really enjoy because I must be extremely naive since i've been to 5 vail resorts in colorado and utah and A-basin and loveland and the aspen resorts are wayyy better and every mountain in Utah is better than PC so I truly do think that they suck and now that they own whistler they'll jack up prices on everything put speed control everywhere turn free parking into paid parking install 10 new 5 star luxury resorts they'll also put down a couple tubing hills and some more zip lines and the resort will now cater to tourists more than the people that have been skiing there for seasons. So how do you think that this is a good thing that a company that only cares about how much money they can milk off of a resort now owns one of the best resorts in north america?

Punctuation. You should learn it.
 
13712062:WildBANimal said:
Vail Resorts is like the asshole in monopoly who keeps hitting 200 on go right from the start and keeps buying up all the shit before anybody else can, then somehow puts fucking hotels on everything.

Is it how you win the game? Yes... but nobody else has fun.

You don't need to land on go to get 200, you just need to pass it. You've been paying monopoly wrong your whole life.
 
13712113:nick_candage said:
Ok' so what resort that vail owns do you really enjoy because I must be extremely naive since i've been to 5 vail resorts in colorado and utah and A-basin and loveland and the aspen resorts are wayyy better and every mountain in Utah is better than PC so I truly do think that they suck and now that they own whistler they'll jack up prices on everything put speed control everywhere turn free parking into paid parking install 10 new 5 star luxury resorts they'll also put down a couple tubing hills and some more zip lines and the resort will now cater to tourists more than the people that have been skiing there for seasons. So how do you think that this is a good thing that a company that only cares about how much money they can milk off of a resort now owns one of the best resorts in north america?

Basically everything you just described whistler already has, just saying...
 
13712113:nick_candage said:
Ok' so what resort that vail owns do you really enjoy because I must be extremely naive since i've been to 5 vail resorts in colorado and utah and A-basin and loveland and the aspen resorts are wayyy better and every mountain in Utah is better than PC so I truly do think that they suck and now that they own whistler they'll jack up prices on everything put speed control everywhere turn free parking into paid parking install 10 new 5 star luxury resorts they'll also put down a couple tubing hills and some more zip lines and the resort will now cater to tourists more than the people that have been skiing there for seasons. So how do you think that this is a good thing that a company that only cares about how much money they can milk off of a resort now owns one of the best resorts in north america?

Going to assume you haven't actually been to whistler before because you just described what Whistler already is. You could at least try to know what you're talking about.
 
13712113:nick_candage said:
Ok' so what resort that vail owns do you really enjoy because I must be extremely naive since i've been to 5 vail resorts in colorado and utah and A-basin and loveland and the aspen resorts are wayyy better and every mountain in Utah is better than PC so I truly do think that they suck and now that they own whistler they'll jack up prices on everything put speed control everywhere turn free parking into paid parking install 10 new 5 star luxury resorts they'll also put down a couple tubing hills and some more zip lines and the resort will now cater to tourists more than the people that have been skiing there for seasons. So how do you think that this is a good thing that a company that only cares about how much money they can milk off of a resort now owns one of the best resorts in north america?

Try Kirkwood on for size :)
 
I don't know if this has been discussed yet, but it's interesting to me how Vail Resorts is willing to spend 1.1 billion on a new resort while telling employees living in employee housing that they have to take on additional roommates, cramming 5 or 6 in places promised to hold 3. It would be nice to see them spend a fraction of that on some employee or low income housing to help support the people that help make it possible for them to buy Whistler.
 
13712259:mooseman077 said:
I don't know if this has been discussed yet, but it's interesting to me how Vail Resorts is willing to spend 1.1 billion on a new resort while telling employees living in employee housing that they have to take on additional roommates, cramming 5 or 6 in places promised to hold 3. It would be nice to see them spend a fraction of that on some employee or low income housing to help support the people that help make it possible for them to buy Whistler.

but treating employees well makes it more difficult to get your $2 million bonus at the end of the year.
 
honestly, don't care too much. Whistler can't possibly get any more commercialized or expensive than it already is. the only thing I'm bummed about is more Canadian business being bought by foreign interests.
 
13712064:WildBANimal said:
Vail Resorts is like the asshole in monopoly who keeps hitting 200 on go right from the start and keeps buying up all the shit before anybody else can, then somehow puts fucking hotels on everything.

Is it how you win the game? Yes... but nobody else has fun.

What do you mean I love the Epic pass? Northstar being built up keeps the idiots away from the place closeby that hosted the Olympics. Heavenly keeps tourists from Seirra and Kwood.

PC and Summit don't appeal to me so there hasn't been a reason to buy it since the first year Kwood was on it but Whistler changes my opinion.

Vail is getting my money again because of this monopoly move. I got it once in 2012-2013 because I knew I'd be driving through Colorado a couple times and Kwood was new to it. But I don't like PC or Summit. I like Whistler and Kirkwood and staying in casinos next to Heavenly when I ski Kwood. Being able to roll up for free skiing after pre-paying in May/June will be the fucking shit. I don't fucking rough it and would never stay in a hostel or really shit hotel things will be a lot more doable without worrying about 150 a day to ski.

Vail the mountain might be overrated but the corporation is awesome this move makes me go from 'not buying' to 'buying'.
 
Back
Top