13426420:Crispy. said:K2 Shreditor 102
13426420:Crispy. said:K2 Shreditor 102
13426693:Gooskin said:How are the Shreditors in comparison with the playfulness?
topic:Gooskin said:I wanted to buy a pair of Line Blend skis for next year, but they have a very low availability in last year's model (which is the cheaper decision) so what are skis with similar flex, use, etc. to the Blend?
13426420:Crispy. said:K2 Shreditor 102
13426478:.Washington said:Yesss ^ came here to say this
13427247:-emile- said:except not at all.
the blend is a park ski, the shreditor isn't.
the edges are thinner so you'll break the 102 way quicker than the blend and the flex pattern isn't uniform in the shredditor.
13427247:-emile- said:except not at all.
the blend is a park ski, the shreditor isn't.
the edges are thinner so you'll break the 102 way quicker than the blend and the flex pattern isn't uniform in the shredditor.
13427275:fresh_prince said:Sponsored by line
13427282:.Washington said:GOTEEEEEM hahahahha
13427275:fresh_prince said:Sponsored by line
13427271:.Washington said:Shreditors
131/102/125
Blends
132/100/122
so width wise no more difference than 3mm??? id call them similar skis?
both are soft skis.
lolol ive seen more people riding the 102 more in the park than the blend.
both are "all mtn" skis.
both are fun to ride.
he asked for a similar ski to the blend, he didnt ask which one will "break" faster. heck ive even seen quite a few cases here on ns that they've snapped their blends.
13429510:Gooskin said:So because the Shreditor isn't symmetrical and has weaker edges, does it ride very differently from the Blend or does it feel the same/similar?
13429513:.Hugo. said:Couldnt tell ya for sure, Ive only ridden the blend. I would assume it rides different but thats only speculation. And different doesnt mean bad either