Skis similar to Line Blend?

Gooskin

Member
I wanted to buy a pair of Line Blend skis for next year, but they have a very low availability in last year's model (which is the cheaper decision) so what are skis with similar flex, use, etc. to the Blend?
 
I have some blends from 2 years ago with the rasta gfx. 75 if you want inbox me. Other then that I would k2 shred 102. On3p has one too
 
I'll say it again and again revision talisman, super nice flex pattern just as soft as this years blends but offer more control I think, very poppy but playful and you can get them for 280 shipped. I snapped a core but they are super boss on their warranty policy.
 
topic:Gooskin said:
I wanted to buy a pair of Line Blend skis for next year, but they have a very low availability in last year's model (which is the cheaper decision) so what are skis with similar flex, use, etc. to the Blend?

I think a pair of icelantic da'nollies or nomads would be similar.
 
As someone whos rode blends for like 7 years i gotta say get your hands on some 4frnt codys if you can, such an awesome ski, very similar to the blend. I think 4frnt changed the name to the gaucho last year but pretty sure its the same ski maybe a little stiffer.
 
13426420:Crispy. said:
K2 Shreditor 102

13426478:.Washington said:
Yesss ^ came here to say this

except not at all.

the blend is a park ski, the shreditor isn't.

the edges are thinner so you'll break the 102 way quicker than the blend and the flex pattern isn't uniform in the shredditor.
 
13427247:-emile- said:
except not at all.

the blend is a park ski, the shreditor isn't.

the edges are thinner so you'll break the 102 way quicker than the blend and the flex pattern isn't uniform in the shredditor.

Shreditors

131/102/125

Blends

132/100/122

so width wise no more difference than 3mm??? id call them similar skis?

both are soft skis.

lolol ive seen more people riding the 102 more in the park than the blend.

both are "all mtn" skis.

both are fun to ride.

he asked for a similar ski to the blend, he didnt ask which one will "break" faster. heck ive even seen quite a few cases here on ns that they've snapped their blends.
 
13427247:-emile- said:
except not at all.

the blend is a park ski, the shreditor isn't.

the edges are thinner so you'll break the 102 way quicker than the blend and the flex pattern isn't uniform in the shredditor.

Sponsored by line
 
13427271:.Washington said:
Shreditors

131/102/125

Blends

132/100/122

so width wise no more difference than 3mm??? id call them similar skis?

both are soft skis.

lolol ive seen more people riding the 102 more in the park than the blend.

both are "all mtn" skis.

both are fun to ride.

he asked for a similar ski to the blend, he didnt ask which one will "break" faster. heck ive even seen quite a few cases here on ns that they've snapped their blends.

Like emile said the edges on the shreditors are thinner, theyll wear out a lot faster. The shreditors also do not have a symmetrical flex pattern or symmetrical rocker/early rise like the blends do. The shreditors have a tapered tip and tail and more rocker.

So while they may have a similar sidecut they are actually quite different
 
So because the Shreditor isn't symmetrical and has weaker edges, does it ride very differently from the Blend or does it feel the same/similar?
 
13429510:Gooskin said:
So because the Shreditor isn't symmetrical and has weaker edges, does it ride very differently from the Blend or does it feel the same/similar?

Couldnt tell ya for sure, Ive only ridden the blend. I would assume it rides different but thats only speculation. And different doesnt mean bad either
 
13429513:.Hugo. said:
Couldnt tell ya for sure, Ive only ridden the blend. I would assume it rides different but thats only speculation. And different doesnt mean bad either

Yeah, I still feel like it would be pretty similar but I'm not sure. I really wish the Blends had more availability with low-ish prices like other skis this time of year
 
Line blend

132/100/122

Fischer Big Stix 100

131/100/123

They look pretty damn close, but it's hard to say how the flex matches up. Line tends to make pretty soft skis, I don't know about Fischer. They both have early rise in the tips and tails, but the blends have a tiny bit of tip taper unlike the big stix. I think that makes the big stix look more attractive imho because you'll have more effective edge for ripping down the mountain.

The big stixs can be found for 61% off. If price is your main concern definitely look at what is available here; http://www.steepandcheap.com/gear-cache/the-after-season-sale---savings-up-to-75-off

Some other skis like the rocker 2 100's and faction prodigies are up for super cheap as well, although their specs don't line up quite as perfectly.
 
Back
Top