Rick Santorum

they can afford it. they choose to have a smartphone, internet at home, nice car, nice clothes, and to eat out rather than take responsibility for themselves and purchase their health care....not to mention not wear condoms and 'accidently' have kids when they're too young to afford it.
 
Ooooh, they do? First I thought you were talking about them, and was like "What the fuck, man", but then I realized you mean them and not them, so now I get it, because they are not like them or those either.
 
Don't even bitch about Obama. Look at the timelines of both Bush 1 and Bush 2. The only time things were really going well here in the US was when the only thing we had to really complain about was that the president had an affair.

If you honestly believe a guy like Santorum would make things better for this country by shifting focus to backwards social ideologies, then you're out of your fucking mind.

...I haven't been the most pleased with Obama, but by god I feel like he's a hell of a lot better to go with than the nutjobs the GOP has come up with - and that includes the insanely out of touch Mitt Romney - who i'm still not sure if he even has a fucking clue what poverty means.
 
369piy.jpg

 
Pressed further, Santorum clarified that he meant Romney was the worst candidate "to run against Barack Obama on the issue of health care, because he fashioned the blueprint. I've been saying it in every speech. Quit distorting our words. If I see it [in print], it's bull(expletive). C'mon man, what are you doing?"

Romney spokesman Ryan Williams quickly issued a statement in response: "Rick Santorum is becoming more desperate and angry and unhinged every day. He see conservatives coalescing around Mitt Romney and he's rattled by the backlash caused by his suggestion that keeping Barack Obama would be better than electing a Republican. He's panicking in the final stages of his campaign."

Bitch Santorum, GET SOME!
 
Funniest thing of the week was him going to Oklahoma and claiming credit for the planned pipeline between Oklahoma and Texas when he neither approved it or had any control over it. It was a response to this Gallop poll....http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2012/03/22/poll-majority-say-build-keystone-pipeline/

A majority of even democrats supports keystone and he screwed the pooch on it. It's hilarious political pandering. Take credit for something he had no hand in and no control over it to try to bolster his energy image.
 
your fascination with facts is beyond me.

jk

well one problem surely is that now tons of uneducated speculators are in the market.

what i mean by that is that like 80 years ago, only onion producers and companies who sell/process onions would have had any interest in onions.

now tons of financial institutions have entered the market, even private investors who have no clue about the onion market itself and only repeat publicly available information, destroying any sort of "wisdom of the crowd" effect. it would be pretty easy to argue that indefinitely more educated players are in the oil market given its global and unrivaled importance.

just my general opinion on commodity markets. no facts, you can relax. oh wait, whats in your posts? facts?

and your point is that volatility is a bad thing. you do not talk about how those prices theoretically still could be efficient. MAYBE the fundamental values of onions jumped like that in that period. hard/impossible to prove but equally impossible to disprove.

just one "fact":

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/fut.20135/pdf

in the korean market, volatility and market efficiency increased after futures were allowed. so a higher volatility was equal to a higher efficiency.
 
technically he "doesnt" OPEC does buttttt Printing TRILLLIONS of dollars makes the price of everything go up. So that kid isnt right and you are for the most part right haha
 
I wont answer you until you answer that thread post about education system reform. Which you still haven't done! OMG SHOCKED

 
Good god woozy, just shut up. No one cares that much about anything you post. Congratulations, you won a political debate on a skiing website. Thats like beating a blind persons score in a vision test. Just give it a rest already.
 
Woozy how would you feel if Ron Paul won the presidency. His ideas and plans make sense to me. I admit I don't know much about all this but I believe he would be the best candidate compared to the rest.

He does actually have a shot of winning the GOP If its a brokered convention. It is definitely slim but I hope it happens.Some reports have ron as second in delegetes to mit in a.(probably not true and I can't find these for you) I believe his grass roots campaign is a lot more effective than most people realize. Most people discount him as crazy without evaluating him.

I'm curious to see why people don't like him.

Hey you. . Yeah you the guy that will post "cus he is a nut" back it up how is he crazy.

I want to see what people have to say
 
Bob Dylan once wrote, The times, they are a-changin. Ron Burgundy had never heard that song.

Here is an ambiguous peom. It may be a little un-palatable for a troll like yourself.

Have you heard of the wonderful one-hoss shay,

That was built in such a logical way

It ran a hundred years to a day,

And then, of a sudden, it — ah, but stay,

I'll tell you what happened without delay,

Scaring the parson into fits,

Frightening people out of their wits, —

Have you ever heard of that, I say?

Seventeen hundred and fifty-five.

Georgius Secundus was then alive, —

Snuffy old drone from the German hive.

That was the year when Lisbon-town

Saw the earth open and gulp her down,

And Braddock's army was done so brown,

Left without a scalp to its crown.

It was on the terrible Earthquake-day

That the Deacon finished the one-hoss shay.

Now in building of chaises, I tell you what,

There is always somewhere a weakest spot, —

In hub, tire, felloe, in spring or thill,

In panel, or crossbar, or floor, or sill,

In screw, bolt, thoroughbrace, — lurking still,

Find it somewhere you must and will, —

Above or below, or within or without, —

And that's the reason, beyond a doubt,

A chaise breaks down, but doesn't wear out.

But the Deacon swore (as Deacons do,

With an "I dew vum," or an "I tell yeou")

He would build one shay to beat the taown

'N' the keounty 'n' all the kentry raoun';

It should be so built that it could n' break daown:

"Fur," said the Deacon, "'t 's mighty plain

Thut the weakes' place mus' stan' the strain;

'N' the way t' fix it, uz I maintain,

Is only jest

T' make that place uz strong uz the rest."

So the Deacon inquired of the village folk

Where he could find the strongest oak,

That could n't be split nor bent nor broke, —

That was for spokes and floor and sills;

He sent for lancewood to make the thills;

The crossbars were ash, from the straightest trees,

The panels of white-wood, that cuts like cheese,

But lasts like iron for things like these;

The hubs of logs from the "Settler's ellum," —

Last of its timber, — they could n't sell 'em,

Never an axe had seen their chips,

And the wedges flew from between their lips,

Their blunt ends frizzled like celery-tips;

Step and prop-iron, bolt and screw,

Spring, tire, axle, and linchpin too,

Steel of the finest, bright and blue;

Thoroughbrace bison-skin, thick and wide;

Boot, top, dasher, from tough old hide

Found in the pit when the tanner died.

That was the way he "put her through."

"There!" said the Deacon, "naow she'll dew!"

Do! I tell you, I rather guess

She was a wonder, and nothing less!

Colts grew horses, beards turned gray,

Deacon and deaconess dropped away,

Children and grandchildren — where were they?

But there stood the stout old one-hoss shay

As fresh as on Lisbon-earthquake-day!

EIGHTEEN HUNDRED; — it came and found

The Deacon's masterpiece strong and sound.

Eighteen hundred increased by ten; —

"Hahnsum kerridge" they called it then.

Eighteen hundred and twenty came; —

Running as usual; much the same.

Thirty and forty at last arrive,

And then come fifty, and FIFTY-FIVE.

Little of all we value here

Wakes on the morn of its hundreth year

Without both feeling and looking queer.

In fact, there's nothing that keeps its youth,

So far as I know, but a tree and truth.

FIRST OF NOVEMBER, — the Earthquake-day, —

There are traces of age in the one-hoss shay,

A general flavor of mild decay,

But nothing local, as one may say.

There could n't be, — for the Deacon's art

Had made it so like in every part

That there was n't a chance for one to start.

For the wheels were just as strong as the thills,

And the floor was just as strong as the sills,

And the panels just as strong as the floor,

And the whipple-tree neither less nor more,

And the back crossbar as strong as the fore,

And spring and axle and hub encore.

And yet, as a whole, it is past a doubt

In another hour it will be worn out!

First of November, 'Fifty-five!

This morning the parson takes a drive.

Now, small boys, get out of the way!

Here comes the wonderful one-horse shay,

Drawn by a rat-tailed, ewe-necked bay.

"Huddup!" said the parson. — Off went they.

The parson was working his Sunday's text, —

Had got to fifthly, and stopped perplexed

At what the — Moses — was coming next.

All at once the horse stood still,

Close by the meet'n'-house on the hill.

First a shiver, and then a thrill,

Then something decidedly like a spill, —

And the parson was sitting upon a rock,

At half past nine by the meet'n-house clock, —

Just the hour of the Earthquake shock!

What do you think the parson found,

When he got up and stared around?

The poor old chaise in a heap or mound,

As if it had been to the mill and ground!

You see, of course, if you're not a dunce,

How it went to pieces all at once, —

All at once, and nothing first, —

Just as bubbles do when they burst.

End of the wonderful one-hoss shay.

Logic is logic. That's all I say.

Rick Santorum on the other hand is an idiot. If you are sick of his shit I know a good doctor who can releive your pain.
 
SANTORUM IS A RACIST PIECE OF SHIT!! He nearly called Obama the n-bomb

(Newser) – Blogs were all a-buzz yesterday that Rick Santorum may have nearly called President Obama the N-word, RawStory reports. Addressing voters in Janesville, Wisconsin, earlier this week, the candidate stopped just short of using America's most incendiary insult: “We know the candidate Barack Obama, what he was like—the anti-war government nig… America was a source for division around the world, that what we were doing was wrong." See the video here; Santorum's stumble comes around the 34:30 mark.

“Oh, come on!” cried a Santorum spokesman when asked about the flub. “Give me a break. That’s unbelievable. What does it say about those that are running with this story that that’s where their mind goes." But RawStory notes that earlier this year, Santorum did say he would not "make black people’s lives better by giving them somebody else’s money"—then later claimed he had started to say another word and ended up saying "blah," not "black." But Santorum hasn't retracted a more bizarre 2012 statement: that Obama, as a black man, shouldn't support abortion rights.

 
It really surprises me that more of this site does not fall more conservatively.

most of you are rich white kids who live in the suburbs, i think about 90% of the ns community resides in connecticut.

perhaps when you grow up and you have your own money you will realize what party fits you.

the main reason i do not like Obama is for his stance on cultural issues, not so much his stance on the economy because he has more of a middle of the road view on that then others in the party.

 
I don't see how having my own money would change my views on a politician?

I prefer a candidate who supports:

-better social programs (healthcare, disability)

-better education standards

-better environmental standards

-no violence/wars/conflicts

-green/alternative/clean energy

-higher taxes (OMG IF I HAD MONEY I WOULDNT WANT TO PAY TAXES ON IT! actually, I'd prefer to pay more if it was going to programs I support, or to help the country I live in fix some of its financial problems)

-no capital punishment

-right for women to choose

-separation of church and state
 
i respect that.

and understand that you can not find all of those characteristics in one person.

since the president says he is against war int he middle east but one of the first things he did was send 30k more troops to Iraq and Afghanistan, granted he pulled the ones out of Iraq out.

i am not going to post all of my personal beliefs but i will post a few jut to show you where i am coming from

-flat tax rate

-less involvement from the federal government in business regulations (bail outs in particular)

- pro life

- more agressive stance to middle eastern countries (pakistan, why are we still giving them aid when they were harboring the most wanted man in the world)

- supports my second amendment right
 
Personally, I agree with all you say. However, the polarizing concept of pro-(choice/life) is a cop-out attempt to force black/white politics on a grey issue. I'll post more if you're down, but if not I won't go there.

For me, social rights are more important than a flourishing economy or saving a buck on taxes. There's absolutely no reason why LGBT's shouldn't have full rights, and that is the make or break issue for me as a voter. I'm happy to buckle down a bit and buy generic cheerios for a while if it means I pay more taxes as the cost of giving people -more- rights.
 
i get what your saying, my choice to be pro life is for a lot of personal reasons, i have gorwn up catholic and that has instilled the idea of saving the life.

granted there are times when an abortion is a better option, especially in cases of rape.

i said a flat tax rate because "all men are created equal" and thusly i think that we should all be taxed equally.

another thing i am looking to see if the drug testing for welfare gets brought back up as i think they should be tested just like someone who was working, government dollars shouldnt be spent to buy them drugs, do that with your own money.
 
That's a very dangerous idea, man, because it's not necessarily true. Think about it this way: the more money you have, the greater opportunity you have to earn it back, and less it affects you as a percentage the greater income bracket you fill. 30% of a million is not as devestating as 30% of 30k. It's basic set theory and statistics, but I see what you're trying to say. It's hard to mathematically acknowledge a intangible perceived value or unquantifiable abstracts like "opportunity".
 
Back
Top