Hey, so first off, gore was very wrong, if you look at the book that the movie was based on he sites one source the entire time, all his figures are based on worst case scenarios, the rate that he mentions is in the 2-3% realm of possibility, I could go on, I just took a 400 level class basically explaining why he's wrong, and to the polar bears, read this week's Newsweek, although their numbers are low they are being listed as endangered on the basis of what will happen to their environment in the subsequent years and also to use as a political tool by environmentalists (the same people putting them on the endangered list are lobbying for other green causes and they are using it as further reason to support their points). Not to say that this isn't an unfortunate event, just that its not quite as volatile as is seems at the moment. Polar bear pops have been dropping noticably for around 15 years, but just like the Sudan genocide (which had been going on during the one in Rwanda although media seemed to ignore it) it just took time to become the activist fad.