12950177:Turd.Ferguson said:You really think if Vail purchases/leases/manages PCMR you will see a difference. Canyons didn't have any different "feel" to it. Most of Vail's resorts all have their own personality and uniqueness. Have you ever skied Kirkwood? It's world's different from Heavenly, let alone Beaver Creek.
Vail purchasing PCMR wouldn't take the ski town of out Park City. In reality, once the dust settles from the purchase, very few people will notice a difference. I'm sure there will be a bit of a shake up regarding higher management at PCMR, but other than that, the town of Park City will continue to be awesome
but what happens when pcmr losses their current managers. they have an extremley unique way with their resort that basically tailors to newschoolers. i feel like big wigs at talisker run more traditional mountains...[/QUOTE]
I really don't think much will change. Plus talisker has absolutely nothing to do with management. They are simply landlords. As Andy said, Vail isn't going to make any drastic changes unless pcmr is losing money. Keystone and Breck are very park oriented; Vail isn't anti-park by any means. Its not like pwdr corp is a hodunk mom and pop corporation either.
I've watched the Canyons purchase/management transition from talisker to Vail first hand and very few things hanged, from job positions to the resorts mantra and feeling. Maybe 25 jobs out if 1000+ changed due to new ownership. After pcmr's mismanagement/dropping the ball on renewing the lease, it might not be bad to have different management running such a crown jewel in the ski industry.
Just out of curiosity, what does everyone see as the downside to having Vail own/manage PC Mr?