Sir yes sir!
For example, let's take a look at Tom Wallisch's sw dub cork 10 trick tip (Which looks like a sw dub rodeo 10 for me, but if the master says it's a dub cork then it's a dub cork. Whatever, it's irrelevant in this case)
/images/flash_video_placeholder.png
If you look at his dub, the first rotation is a sw rodeo 5 (or a sw cork 5 since it's a sw dub CORK. Again, this is irrelevant).
After the first rotation comes the second one. Now, according to some of you guyzzzzzzzzzzzzz the second rotation should be a sw (or forward, I haven't yet fully figured out your theory) cork/rodeo 5 since the first one was a sw cork/rodeo 5 and the name of the dub is sw dub cork/rodeo 10.
Well, is it a rodeo/cork 5? No, it's not. It is an undeflip. Tom even recommends to learn really flippy sw rodeo 5 and underflips before trying the dub.
So this leaves us some options:
1) I am wrong, the second flip is indeed a sw cork/rodeo. If this is the case, I apologize. Hate me all you want. Your theory still applies to this trick.
2) Your theory doesn't apply to sw doubles, which would be extremely stupid IMO.
3) I am right. The second rotation is an underflip. According to your "theory", this would mean that Tom Wallisch, the Newschoolers' loved one, calls this double with a wrong name (It should be something like sw rodeo/cork 5 to underflip) or your theory is bullshit.
I'm leaning towards the 3rd option, but I would like to hear your guyzzzzzzzzzz opinion too. And btw, this post is as relevant to this thread as "OMG dat aint no dub misty its a misty to backflip you noobz" - posts.