I dunno about condescending, I doubt anyone can honestly think Luongo is deluded and somehow believes he's outplayed Thomas in this series, and everything he said is correct. It sounded more to me like an answer to a question that was really stupid and annoying for a player who just first-starred in a game. I can get why you'd be frustrated after responding to ridiculous pressure with a fucking 1-0 shutout only to have to hear everyone yet again go "how about that Timmy Thomas again, hey?""Can you please explain to everyone why that goal wasn't Timmy's fault?" "Roberto, no one was stopping that puck, right? It was just bad luck?" Fuck off, how about we talk about stuff that they guy you're asking the question of was actually involved in.
Second, it's a dumb question because it's "from a goaltender's perspective, talk about this thing". Well, fuck, obvioulsy it depends on the goaltender, they're not all the same. Tim Thomas is nothing like Roberto Luongo. They play totally differently. How is his perspective relevant? From this particular goaltender's perspective that's an easily stoppable puck. Several of the other 24 that Thomas stopped certainly would not have been easily stoppable and he might have let a couple of those in. Because Thomas's style is what it is he stopped all of those 24, just like this one went in because his style is what it is. But if you ask a dumb question...