Obama encourages kids to succeed, conservatives protest...

exactly because the kids wouldnt be watching it. i meaan seriously, lets be honest, i would be willing to bet that 99% of parents dont care what hes saying, or when hes saying it, they just dont want their kids hearing anything but their point of view.
 
Again, being president of the harvard law review is not a position awarded for intellect. It basically just means the chief editor chosen by his peers. And it doesn't seem like he did much while he was there, if I'm wrong find me some works credited to Obama (and no I don't mean dreams of my father or audacity).
If he's so intelligent why is he so hell-bent on keeping all his shit secret, no one has provided me with a single answer to this question so I'll answer it. He got just as much of a ride on affirmative action as Bush did as a legacy. If you feel like you can provide me a more logical conclusion I'll be open to consider it. Until then I don't want another bullshit remark about the harvard law review = super smart.
At least Bush put it all out in the open, and if Bush did so horrible, maybe you'd be surprised to learn that both of the past two democratic nominees for president did worse that Bush, imagine that.

 
Wait, so, now Gore is a dunce, too? I mean, I guess I can see Kerry not being a great mind of his generation, but Gore? Because he always seemed pretty damned bright to me and just about everyone else. Is it lonely out there on that limb, or what?

Look, people thought Bush was an idiot because of his public persona, the kind of stuff he said, and the grades were just one way of poking fun at him besides the "bush-isms". It was the same way with Dan Quayle. You say something stupid in front of a camera that the news thinks it can make into a cycle, it's played over a hundred times. They don't care who says it, they care if they can make advertising revenue by showing it repeatedly. That's why people think Bush is dumb. If you think Obama is an idiot, you're welcome to that opinion, but once again, that limb isn't too thick, which is why there are only a few of you on it. Even the people who disagree with Obama are generally willing to preface their dismay at his policies with "he's a bright guy, but..."
 
please explain to me how affirmative action gets you to graduate magnum cum laude. please.
 
http://www.larryelder.com/Gore/goredubiousrecord.htm
There's something to chew on. And yes Gore is a dunce,
2dv7e41.jpg

as well as a hypocrite, but I don't want to talk anymore about him.
I never said Obama is an idiot intelligence-wise, if I did feel free to point it out, only that he was helped along significantly by affirmative action. If this is not the case then, like I've said, provide me with a logical explanation on why he keeps all his shit so securely under wraps when past presidents and nominees who are "not as intelligent as Obama" had that information available to the public.

 
explain to me how affirmative action does not get you into Harvard Law in the first place with a (most likely) 2.9 average. Or for that matter Columbia with a (most likely) even worse record at Occidental.
I feel like I'm beating this shit to death. Just admit he hides his records because he wants everyone to believe he achieved everything academically by his own merits, since the truth is that he got to where he is because of affirmative action. Thats it, nada mas. Done, over, finito.
 
i suppose. but theres a big difference between columbia and high school. but whatever, if you wanna think hes dumb, its not worth arguing lol.
 
Again, I didn't say he was dumb. But neither is he this genius nobel laureate that the left makes him out to be.
 
So you would be willing to say right now, on record that The President most likely had a 2.9 or lower GPA? Give me a fucking break.And as per your previous comment, would you care to explain how one can be an idiot NON-intelligence wise?
 
My momma says stupid is as stupid does
But yes I am willing to say on record, for everyone to see, that the president had a 3.3 or lower GPA with my best guess being a 2.9 from Columbia, you can have your break now.
 
i mean i dont think hes like the brightest dude alive or anything lol. but i do get the feeling he is very intelligent.
 
Thread got hijacked there but just to clear a few things up.

From this post on no one will challenge Obama's academic record based on "Affirmative Action". I don't care how black you are, it does not guarantee good grades. Affirmative action might have made it possible for Obama to pay for college, but it did not get him grades.

Scaledo your arguments are so off base and out of control I can't stand it. You are shitting all over America and achievement when you marginalize someones academic record by attributing his success to favoritism and affirmative action and defend a man like Bush who's academic record is questionable and his attendance due mainly to his father being a legacy.

By all accounts and records Obama is intelligent. The reason you can't accept this is because you don't want to, not because it is not true. Also Al Gore is considered to be intelligent although socially awkward.

Topic over.

Health Care

What is wrong with the health care debate is that it is not a debate on health care. It is a witch hunt to try and destroy Obama. This type of attack has happened to every recent liberal president. The republicans want to shoot down everything yelling as much as they can that the government is trying to control your life.

Here are the facts of the argument. We have the wost health care system per dollar in the entire world. 60% of bankruptcies are attributed to health care bills. Despite the horror stories in every scientific study countries with socialized health care provide better care. Insurance companies do not have your best interest in mind. If nothing is done our country will collapse under the weight of health care.

We live in a representative democracy, you lost the election, you have the right to disagree with the president but nothing gives you the right to try and destroy the president for personal gain. The republicans fucked up the country. You got voted out get over you looser pussies, you are lucky Obama is even including you in running this country.
 
What an honor that we're lucky enough for the great Obama to "include" us.
I will continue, without backing down, that Obama got to where he is because of affirmative action. You are naive as fuck to not think so. Not only do you have a hard time spelling, but you seem to have a hard time reading as well. I didn't defend Bush for being a legacy, on the contrary I stated that legacies are bullshit. He was a mediocre student, but no more mediocre than his democrat counterparts that are "considered" to be so much brighter than he is, these are facts. That being said, at least I have the right mind to actually be able to criticize Bush for this. Unlike you of course who cannot admit anything contrary to what you want to believe about your messiah with your "Obama is hella smart! He did it all on his own! Thats why he doesn't want anybody to know how he did of course!" I'd like to see all the "by all accounds and records", oh wait, they're all sealed up. Its simply this myth that left-wing idealogies somehow run parallel with intelligence. Sure he's intelligent, but if you think his intelligence alone got him to where he is you've really got the wool pulled over your eyes.
What part of graduating without honors do you fail to understand? That means for a fact that he had a 3.3 or lower. Would that have been enough to get him into Harvard Law had he been your average white guy?
Obama is an affirmative action produced community organizer who has written two mediocre books. He was voted into the highest office in this country, with the least political experience of any presidential nominee in history, riding a bandwagon wave of stupid young voters intent on such ambiguos promises as "hope" and "change". I use to really dislike Hillary but at least she's far more pragmatic than he is. He's a con man who believes his own lies. For example, "government health care will be deficit neutral and, my favorite, if you like your insurance plan you can keep it".

 
there is one thing to think aboug though... he was part of the Harvard Law Review right? which to my understanding is like the ultimate goal of every law student in the country, yet, he never wrote anything for it..... it just seems weird is all im saying.
 
no, please NO!!!!! there is an 11 or 12 page thread that OhMyBosh started on this and it blew the fuck up.... dont start this.
 
you do realize that public school is free and that the government doesnt get any revenue from it, they actually put a lot of money into it so every kid can get an education. Monopolies are bad because the owner jacks up prices and has no opposition, sooooo yeah, public schools = not a monopoly
 
no i was just showing that Obama is a informed, intelligent man, someone i would want to be my president. Bush was a lazy, ignorant stupid brat, not someone i want to be my president.
 
so when the education budget gets bigger and bigger, government TAKES more and more money and there is little you can do to stop it whats that called?

government jacks up price (taxes) people have few options for education. fun fact, there is something like 95k public schools in this country, while something like 28k private.

think about it this way, YOU not the government pays for education.
 
are you fucking joking? get kids on his side by telling them to succeed? you do understand that none of them voted in the last election and most of them wont vote in the next one, dont you? the president usually has an angle but I am doubting that he is just trying to get kids on board with healthcare here, seeing as how their support is as about as useful as a painting of 2 dolphins doing it
 
i think this topic shows the sad state of our current two party system.

uninformed republicans started skwaking away about brain washing, when regean (in 88) and bush (in 91) addressed the nation's kids the same way. and obama's speech was already released and has no evil plans to convert america's schoolchildren into democrats, and simply encourages them to succeed and stay in school.

one party cannot attempt to accomplish anything without the other party attempting to put its nuts in a vise over the issue. our two party system is a failure.
 
hey if you actually read my posts, you will see my point of view is drastically different than delphi's. Mine was fair, and I just brought up the point that it might help out to have parents involved to reinforce the message.

The republicans made us look like idiots on this one. Next time we have something to discredit obama with, people will remember the republicans stupid mistake to get all pissed off about something that hadn't happened yet.
 
Meh, I dont see why this is such a big deal from either side.
To the right wingers, there was next to nothing in there that was pushing his political agenda. But on the other side of the coin, this speach isnt doing anything for our kids. People (espec socialists) like these sorts of things because it makes everyone feel good. I'm a less for feelings type person and a more results orientated person.
In 5 months from now when all the kids are writing finals they arent going to study more because Obama said so... thats just dumb.
 
im just curious why Obama seems to do something EVERY week like he is just trying to stay in the news. couldnt he, oh, i dont know take a week off, stay out of the public eye, and actually try to work rather than having stupid political rallies, speeches, and news conferences?
 
im just curious why Obama seems to do something EVERY week like he is just trying to stay in the news. couldnt he, oh, i dont know take a week off, stay out of the public eye, and actually try to work rather than having stupid political rallies, speeches, and news conferences?
 
he went on vacation to marthas vineyard a week or two ago. By the time his presidency is over, even if its just one term, he will prob be the most televised and photographed president ever.
 
thats vacation, not working. AND, didnt he say he wanted to be closer to the people? how is vacationing in a place like Marthas Vineyard making him more like the common man? you have to have a billion dollar bank account to even TRY and stay there.
 
because hes trying to keep people behind him. it worked for fdr, why wouldnt it work for him?
 
yes but lets be real, can the president be the common man during his presidency? esp with as many people as there are that hate him, thats like asking to get assassinated.
 
He makes use of every media minute and story to push his agenda forward. He wants peopel to be on his side when they vote therefore every chance he gets he puts himself on your (the peoples) side. For example, he wears shity jeans because he is making a statement that he is just like every other american with shity jeans they like. He is all about the people, which is what lefties (socialists, liberals) all LOVE.
My beef is that he is the president, he isnt everyone else. All this bullshit press that builds his image is a waste of our time. I couldnt give a shit what jeans he wears, but I'd expect him to wear jeans that fit since the tax payers are hiring someone to dress him.
 
i dont know, maybe its just me but, personally i feel that the more time he spends blabbing at me from behind a podium, blabbing at me through press conferences, blabbing at me through political rallies where he is talking like he is still and the fucking campaign trail is LESS time that he could spend behind his desk working on something to keep this country from destroying itself.
 
why though? i mean, he got elected, no stupid recount BS like in GWs first term... so why still act like you are on the campaign trail? why not, settle down, go to work, and worry about campaigning in like 2011 or late 2010?
 
because, he doesnt want to lose people now, and have to gain them back later. the people love to think (notice i said think) that the president is on their level, and really cares what they think. and hes been conveying that pretty well so far.
 
then why is it that i still hate the guy? i just plain didnt like his ideas during the campaign and now i outright hate the man.
 
because, hes not trying to win over the hardcore conservatives. theres no point. just like mccain wasnt trying to win over super liberal people like me.
 
in regards to the under 3.3 affirmative action bit.......
Grad school is a lot less grades orriented than getting into a bachelors program.
Most applicants are fully qualified for the program, and the Committee on Graduate Studies must select from among a large number of candidates who have excellent credentials. In evaluating applications, the Committee takes into consideration the applicant's grades and rank in his or her law and other university studies, letters of recommendation, occupational interests, professional and personal accomplishments, and other factors
They see your entire college history, what jobs you have had and what you have done. A 4.0 GPA with no extra curriculars or work experience is not going to be as saught after as a 3.0 who was on the student government, volunteered every week, and worked so many hours a week.
3.0's happen to amazing students for a reason. I took courses that interested me and challenged me for the sake of learning. I got a C- in Advanced Genetics for Biology Majors. I was not a Biology major and had not taken a biology course in 3 years. I got a C+ in a wine sommelier course. I got a B- in French and a C+ in German because I may not be great with languages but I love them. Yet
So don't say affirmative action unless you have applied for multiple grad schools and seen exactly what they look at in their applicants. And yes, going to school in indonesia and being raised by a single parent may help. But at the same it's Harvard, his parents aren't rich. He didn't buy his way in like I'm sure other politicians have.
Final statement, highschool, undergrad, masters.... none of them matter if you get a PhD. All that matters is your final graduation. and Summa is good enough for me.
 
Back
Top