Obama bypassing congress to make sricter gun laws....

And you changed it again, The first post that started this argument was assault weapons ban. That's all I'm talking about if you want to talk about all guns and my views on them, That's an argument I'm sick of having and not going into. Also you put words into my mouth by saying i want to ban assault weapons. I've come to the conclusion that you can't read. And again fucking listen That was my view on assault weapon You keep changing this argument in to all guns and all violent crime. And yes mass shootings represent a small amount of crime What you're saying is we should do nothing about it because it's a small portion.
 
SHOW ME WHERE I CHANGEDDDD ITTTTT.

So you want to do something about a small part of gun crime, as opposed to a much larger part of gun crime? You don't want 11,000 less people to die? just a couple hundred less?

That's a stupid opinion to hold.
 
ironically if every shooting wasn't immediately put on every news channel, loserass stupid fucks wouldn't go perform these shootings because they wouldn't know they would be famous for it.

inb4 - "they're not losers! they're mentally fucked!!"

 
Your reading comprehension is incredible. And you also are saying that you don't care if a cupple 100 of people a year died as long as you get your assult weapon.
 
you thinking these people are just losers and not actually mentally ill may not make you a loser, but it sure does make you stupid (my apologies if you have been living under a rock for the last 10 years and are ignorant and just don't know any better).
 
Instead of insulting me, why don't you prove me wrong. That works better.

Couple hundred people die a year from hammers, and those aren't banned :)
 
I will never understand it either? Have yet to hear a logical argument how we are a safer society without Assault Rifles which account for a miniscule amount of gun crimes in America.
 
lol you said that people shouldn't be able to use guns because self defense is crazy. you said you would use a knife or baseball bat to defend yourself against a gunman or you would flee hahaha.

you're mental, who are you even arguing with?
 
Anything else you'd like to make up. We also already had this bat and knife argument. But you're taking it out of context I said in many situations it is more dangerous to pull out a gun and fireback, I also then stated I would not use a bat or knife to fight off a gunman I was talking about being robed with out a gun. The most amazing part is I've explained this to you four times and you still bring it up in every thread we have. Anyway back to your post then i proceeded to show you a study that states in the home where a firearm is kept You are 28.5 times more likely to be shot. While being robbed as opposed to a house where a firearm is not kept. You made up everything else I said in that post. Feel free to find my comment where I said No one should ever use a gun For self-defense ever, because thats never been my view, And you're making shit I said up. Because you don't have any real arguments without your "what if they rape your children" scenario. Show me when I said that and I'll apologize.
 
That's a really awesome argument man, Let's see do the benefits of having tools outweighed the deaths they cause? Now do the use of legally owned assault weapons outweigh the deaths they cause? Now your reading comprehension and your arguments suck.
 
I also like to point out you change the argument around again, because I never stated all assault weapons should be banned You keep putting words in my mouth.
 
How old are you?

like 17?

maybe 155 lbs?

I feel like there's a reason why you embrace such beta faggot ideology and you don't have a spine and can't stand up for yourself.

If a man enters my house armed, I swear to God I will defend my family to my dying breath. I will crawl on broken legs and hands to kill him. I wouldn't just let them take what they wanted. That's now how you live. You don't go through life in subservience and afraid
 
Nope I'm older than you I'm stronger than you and my dad could beat up your dad. But on a real note studies show that when you start to fire on a home invader or rober the statistics of you and your family dying skyrocket.
 
An armed populace is an honest government. When the populace is forced into subservience and it's will broken? The government is going to take the bill of rights and wipe their ass with it.

Please provide the actual statistics, from a verified non-biased source.

Furthermore

Freedom is never more than one generation away from extinction. We didn't pass it to our children in the bloodstream. It must be fought for, protected, and handed on for them to do the same, or one day we will spend our sunset years telling our children and our children's children what it was once like in the United States where men were free.

 
Don't know why you posted any of those useless quotes. But I'm on my phone ill try to find the study when I'm back on my computer.
 
Thats what im talking about. You just gotta leave it alone and live to argue another day zzz. The gun debate isnt even a fun argument
 
I got to say man you've gone from being one of my most unfavorite members to ever so slowly crawling your way back up I seem to be agreeing with you more and more.
 
We probably agree on a lot more than we disagree on. I bet we would get along great. Still in breck? I will buy you a beer at BB next week if you are
 
The study makes sense, an escalation of force resulting in injury or death to one of the participants. I'd love to see how many of the 667 were victims vs an aggressor. You know? Like how often was it the person who tried to rob them that was shot, vs the person who was being robbed because they're both carrying a gun and pegged as gun-carriers according to the study.

Interesting none the less, the quotes are important, and only one of them is a quote. The last bit about freedom was a Ronald Reagan quote. It shows the understanding by US presidents preceding the current one, that governmental action quickly turns to tyranny if left unchecked. That's all
 
Will see I'm still on morphine so I don't know if I'll be allowed to drink, But if I can get a ride from Boulder first rounds on me.
 
Even more of a reason to drink. I was on liquid Percocet for like 3 weeks in december and that didnt stop me. In fact it made me drink more, lol
 
i lied about what? lol

Quoting JL8 from Dec 15 2012 9:45:51:

when the dog gets shot what is your next form of protection?

a bat a knife 911 or just leaving. my stat above shows you are more likely to be killed in a gun fight, then if you don't have a gun and give the person what ever they want.
 
excuse me, don't mind if i butt in here, but hammers aren't designed for killing people you fuckwit.
 
boom. they are called spineless cowards lol. it's not about the chance of a fatality, it is called self defense and these cowards should actually learn their rights before they try to scrutinize or even judge the actions of others.
 
Because im just using this thread to talk about guns heres som interesting stuff.

I bought my AK brand new for $430 in the summer and now its sold out at the price of $630.

I bought two 1000 round cases of 7.62 ammo in the summer/fall for $250/case. The same cases are now $325 and sold out.

I was able to buy 40 round steel mags for $8 a piece. Now those mags are $20 and sold out. All AK mags doubled in price at least in the last weeks.

I cant imagine the jump in prices for AR15 stuff because thats the much more popular platform even though its a jam factory.
 
yes, and you doing and believing exactly what every piece of paper tells you to makes you a mindless sheep. which is worse?
 
yes, and you doing and believing exactly what every piece of paper tells you to makes you a mindless sheep. which is worse?
 
which piece of paper?

lol this goes way back in history. it is called self defense, it is a god-given right. your ego is what is making you a mindless sheep.
 
The US constitution says every man has the right to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.

A man depriving me of my family, is a deprivation of my right to life. They are that important to me. I love those around me, that are related to me..so incredibly that I would die for them without hesitation. If a man said, either you or your Mom dies of cancer, I'd volunteer without fanfare or hesitation.

That's just me though, everyone can interpret it on their own. To each their own man, we'll obviously never agree.
 
Just throwing this in here: Canada has nearly the same gun per-capita as America, yet the murder rate is drastically lower. It really has nothing to do with guns, the problem lies in the troubles souls that are using them to kill people! America has a social crisis.

 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Number_of_guns_per_capita_by_country

gun-own-totals.jpg
 
again, why is the constitution automatically correct?

and i have no problem with defending your life/family if you are actually threatened. but there's a big difference between that and thinking "oh, someone's in my house who i don't know, better go blow their head off" before you know why they are there. if someone comes to rob your house with no intention of hurting you or your family i don't think it's okay to kill them, even if it is technically self-defense. not saying you do, by the way.
 
consitution, dec. of independence, bill of rights, laws in general. why is self defense a "god-given right?" what does that even mean? does it say so in the bible? if not, i don't know how it can be "god-given"

huh? what does my ego have to do with anything? what am i saying/have said that makes me a mindless sheep?
 
what do any of those pieces of paper have to do with someone who is not american? have you never heard of morals??? lol! and yes, it is mentioned in the bible in both the old and new testament. so is the right to be armed.

your ego......the fact you think you are morally a better person because you make the choice to not use your right of self defense, and instead let a criminal do whatever they please lol. you already admitted to knowing that this is spineless behaviour, what else could it be besides your ego?
 
and you think that it is ok for that thief to be able to just do whatever he wants? hahahahaha

i bet it's ok to hit him with a hammer, as long as you don't kill him right?
 
wha...what? when did nationality come into the conversation?

yes. i have heard of morals. that is what i am basing my opinion on instead of what the bible/consitution/dec. of independence/bill of rights tells me. does it seem morally right to kill someone for trying to steal your tv? i don't think so. it assumes that your material possessions are as valuable as a human life, and that just seems fundamentally incorrect to me. and, yeah, i guess you're right, i would think the person who doesn't kill someone to stop them from stealing their material possessions is morally better than the person who does. still not sure what that has to do with my ego?

i have no problem with someone defending themselves/their family if their lives are actually being threatened, but, again, that is completely different than your first reaction being to kill anyone who enters your home unannounced without knowing what their motive is.
 
no, you don't let the thief do whatever he or she wants. you get your gun and say "leave or i'll shoot you" and call the cops. if they don't leave, then you shoot, but not to kill.

course it's okay to hit him with a hammer or whatever else as long as you don't kill him. you can turn him over to the cops, but not kill him
 
so you're starting to get it. how do you know the motives of someone who just criminally broke into your home? you have to assume the worst, since this person is obviously not there to give you a high five. but i'm curious then, if a person did break into your home "unannounced and without you knowing their motives", would you defend it and your family, or would you let that person just have the run of the house?
 
Does canada have a gang problem? Some should show gang related gun homicides vs non gang related gun homicides.

quite frankly i dont give two shits if two gangbangers shoot each other. Good riddance.
 
lolololol. so when you hit that thief with a hammer and he accidently dies, you are saying that you would be criminally responsible for that and go to jail??? wow hahahaha nice troll, bud. have a nice day.
 
you don't, of course. but, when you find them in your home, and they aren't armed, why do you have to shoot them right away? if they aren't armed they can't hurt you if you have a weapon. if they are armed you can always shoot to disable but not kill, right? shoot them in the arm(s) so they can't shoot you back, but you don't need to go straight for the head.
 
......yeah duhhhhhhh you must be joking. what you are saying is exactly what the laws of self defense say. holy shit fucking retarded kids don't even know their rights jesus hahahaha
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top