I know how explicit it was, and I asked expn to let me know if it was going to be a problem....no one told us anything.  AJ chose that song because it was how he wanted the edit to be represented, and it was misrepresented by expn when they dubbed another song over it for censorship.  Don't get me wrong, it was super explicit and definitely violent.  But when we work with an artist to create video content for our brand, we give them 100% creative control over that edit.  If expn had a problem with that song, they should let us know so we can get it fixed or try and work out the problem.  When it is changed without any notification to us and just put online, then I get upset.  It has to do with branding and we put a lot of time, money, and effort into creating unique content for you guys.  When it is altered without consent then I think the artist who created that has a right to be upset.
I understand expn's stand on that type of music but I just would have liked to have know how it was going to be handled before it was thrown up online.  expn has been a great partner and I think this was just a communication error.  It will be resolved and the original will be available for viewing once that is taken care of.
But Scooter, I expect you to understand the role of censorship in art, and quite frankly, I am surprised at your stance.
-Pete