Here's a question I want to pose- In the past, some of the largest changes in society and policy in the U.S. have been a result of violence. At what point is it necessary for a physical response (not looting) to prevent further injustice and infringement of rights in the united states. Where is the line drawn?
If the past 10 years have shown anything its that protests and voting do not create the wanted results. Billionaires still don't pay taxes, cops still act like an occupying military, and more and more of our freedoms get taken away every year. With the average U.S. citizen paying the price. As someone who has seen first hand what a physical response to someone believing their rights are infringed upon looks like I am doing everything BUT advocating for it.
Just interested to hear what our weird little community thinks
If the past 10 years have shown anything its that protests and voting do not create the wanted results. Billionaires still don't pay taxes, cops still act like an occupying military, and more and more of our freedoms get taken away every year. With the average U.S. citizen paying the price. As someone who has seen first hand what a physical response to someone believing their rights are infringed upon looks like I am doing everything BUT advocating for it.
Just interested to hear what our weird little community thinks