Mammoth or pc ?

NGA

NGA

Active member
this winter me and a couple weirdos are going on a road trip, to mammoth or pc. i dont think we can do both cause thats a bit pricey soo...name it

we're from bc,canadia so pc is a bit farther away, so i duno
 
DEFINATELY mammoth, soooo much more terrain that noone ever recognizes them for. there are some rediculously awesome runs you can take. and the park is pretty sweet too, especially south park and jibs galore
 
dude? its seriously the complete opposite of that. their park is fucking bomber aka one of the best in the nation and the rest of them mountain sucks. honestly what kind of skiing are you girls looking to do? peace
 
i would honestly just pick hte one closer to you, they are both sick in their own ways, save a few hundred bucks on gas.
 
idk. it depends how long your going for. you may ahve said it in your question but i read through all the comments and i don't remember. if you are going for like a week, i would say park city cause that is like another 2 days of driving that you wouldn't have to waste. but if you are going to skibumb it for while and go for like a month or somthing mammoth is the place to be. i have never been there personally but i know people that live there and i have heard one complaint......sometimes it snows so much its allmost not worth skiing. and by that i meanduring the storm itself, there is never too much pow
 
we're going for like only a week, we're looking to ski a sick park with good rails, nice setups, big jumps, and if it dumps we wanna be able to ski the pow.

which mountain suits that??
 
park city is for sure your best bet.. i think its park is just as good as mamoths, maybe not the rails, but the jumps and the pipe are super sick... and if you want to be able to ski pow.. you not only have park city to shred but you also have the canyons and deer valley.. all their back countrys have sick terrain... and theres always night skiing at park city as well as a bunch of sick urban stuff around and if you want to go down to salt lake, brighton also has a pretty nice park and the alta/snowbird area has awesome terrain
 
goto mammoth so it can be sunny and you can ski park in the sun and show of your set of tatas in your icon in the sun...

honestly i havent skiied anywhere besides NY or VT so, I wouldnt know
 
most of the people responding to this havent been to both places....if they were to ski at mammoth, theyd know whatsup, if you going around christmas time, thats when mammoth gets shitted on for a couple of days, plus park city doesnt get all their shit up untill about december, mammoth has soooo much more fools, soooo much more.
 
weeeeeeeeee!!!! even though you can't spell my last name right johnathon.

but i say go wherever is closer.
 
south park was so fun last year around new years not many rails but super fun small jumps. It also snowed like 9 ft in 36 hours. You cant go wrong with mammoth besides stupid people from LA. All this said, I will probably be in Utah then, its not so bad either I hear.
 
Dont come here Go to PC...... NOONE from mammoth rocks leg bags I dont what the fuck that was all about. Hennie knows whats good,and to end the debate, PC DOES have ONE of the best parks...... Mammoth has THE best. But were all dicks here and all the nice guy thugs from 4bi9 are in PC kick it with them. You cant come here looking to ski park becuase we might not have one for two months at a time due to the rediculous amount of pow we get.
 
Man I never thought Id see Matty OR Sean hattin on MAMM,you guys know better, And to homie claiming mammoth from the "art crew" I dont know you so you should really stop claimin'.
 
park city is actually kinda overrated. there park is not overrated but the mountain itself kinda is.. its 100 times better then the mountain i ski but i would rather movie down to little cotten wood canyon instead, unless you are set on hitting mainly park.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top