M&A stoke
- Thread starter SSteezle
- Start date
CrotchKiller
Active member
Oh.shut up
DrZoidberg
Active member
Yeah I've been doing that. It's the concavity I'm having problems with now. I've had them under a book all day now so they're probably fine. I never have this problem with 35mm, probably cause they're so skinny.
CrotchKiller
Active member
U guise should kiss
family_vacation
Active member
Quoting for emphasis.
hollygrove
Active member
hahaha you guys are such nerds go - go out and shoot!!
to add to stoke next week i'm assisting with one of my professors. portrait for an editorial for some new york magazine - all shooting on 4 x 5 too just to prove analog still reigns supreme even in editorial work
to add to stoke next week i'm assisting with one of my professors. portrait for an editorial for some new york magazine - all shooting on 4 x 5 too just to prove analog still reigns supreme even in editorial work
Downtofilm
Active member
Fabricating my demo reel, pretty stoked on it so far.
Brock.
Active member
Canadian tire ftw. I was buying christmas shit for my mom and ended up making a surprisingly solid handle for under $15 bucks. THEY MAKE DIGI-CAMO coloured ducttape. boom. Also I'm going to kick my a-bangs delamination's ass tomorrow with a few plastic bags, clamps, and a $20 dollar blowtorch I also bought at canadian tire.
tldr: Canadian Tire is the best ever
tldr: Canadian Tire is the best ever
pjbackwoods
Active member
NS HELP ME OUT WITH A QUICK QUESTION:
Snows about to fall in ontario and i want to do some timelapses. How long should a timelapse of snowfall usually be and will there be any problems with leaving my t2i outside of long hours? Lastly how many gigs of card space should i have ready when shooting a timelapse and what should the settings be at?
Any helpful answers +k
Snows about to fall in ontario and i want to do some timelapses. How long should a timelapse of snowfall usually be and will there be any problems with leaving my t2i outside of long hours? Lastly how many gigs of card space should i have ready when shooting a timelapse and what should the settings be at?
Any helpful answers +k
plorr
Active member
Read this: https://www.newschoolers.com/ns/cult/forumthread/thread_id/716484/
To protect your camera you could just put a plastic bag over it with a hole for the lens, or attach some kind of umbrella-type cover over it.
To protect your camera you could just put a plastic bag over it with a hole for the lens, or attach some kind of umbrella-type cover over it.
pjbackwoods
Active member
Thank you sir. I knew there would be countless threads on this topic but i cant searchbar cause im on mobile
Official_Recap
Active member
STOKED to finish this recent project to round out a pilot mini-series for a client. Even more stoked to be back on track after the theft of most of my editing equipment!
![[J_Gasper]](/data/avatars/m/126/126808.jpg?1745610720){kind=avatar}
[J_Gasper]
Active member
get rid of that canon 50 and then you will have a really bad ass setup.
Brentizzle
Active member
that was ultra tight. props. great work.
Downtofilm
Active member
Pretty much the same setup, once I buy the 85.
[J_Gasper]
Active member
Thats what im trying to say. Its not bad, but all of his other lenses are pretty damn good. There are MANY more options in the 100-150 dollar price range, unless you need AF.
SSteezle
Active member
surprisingly I really see no need to upgrade the 50, unless I were to go for the 1.2-- which is a little out of my budget. I could care less about how fast the auto focus is, as I only use it for video. Also, even though a lot of people love this lens, I still think it's very overlooked. It's built like a toy but the glass is amazing. I take good care of my gear, so I'm not too concerned about how well the build is. Best 90 bucks I've ever spent
[J_Gasper]
Active member
If you dont use the AF because you are using video, you could upgrade to something in the same price range. I know I got my SMC Tak 50mm 1.4 for $110 in absolute pristine condition. It is sharper, and faster than the canon. Not to mention, the price of them only goes up due to high demand.
I loved my 50mm to, but when I switched over to a vintage 50mm, I was hitting myself for not doing it sooner.
I loved my 50mm to, but when I switched over to a vintage 50mm, I was hitting myself for not doing it sooner.
Mag
Active member
I didn't really like it because of the focus ring being shit, and it being way too delicate for me. I don't see why everyone thinks having a short focus ring is such a bad thing, I much prefer a 90 degree(although ~150 would probably be best) to 270, 270 just takes too long to turn and can't be done in one motion. I don't get why everyone is having such a hard time making small adjustments with a short focus throw.
[J_Gasper]
Active member
Well with the Canon 50 f1.8, the throw was short, AND the focus ring it self was small, and not smooth at all. That was one major turn off for me.