14076076:animator said:The Chronic was changed last year. The 18/19 and 19/20 skis are the same. The older version was 90mm underfoot, mostly camber and a traditional shape. The new one has been fattened up to 95, with more rocker and a decent amount of taper. Read the Newschoolers Roofbox review, but Twig says its more of an all-mountain ski now, compared to the old one which was dedicated to park riding.
The Prodigy 1.0 is stiffer than the Chronic, which makes it a lot more capable all over the mountain. It's not super stiff, it's still fun but the Chronic is real soft now (not quite Blend soft though). What size are you looking at and what is your heigh/weight/age/preferred skiing location?
14076163:Alvinb said:I am 15 years old 174cm(5'8") 60kg(132lbs). I am Intermediate-advanced skier. I ski mostly groomers, park and offpist. Not alot of powder.
14076233:animator said:Prodigy will be good, given that you’re not too tall or heavy it’ll be perfect
14076266:Alvinb said:I know that the faction prodigy 1.0 is very poppy and great in the park. But how does it preform in terms of carving, in the roofbox review he said that the skis wasn't that great.
14076314:animator said:The ski is good on piste, if you mount it at center it won’t be as good at carving. At -2 or -3 it will carve real well and you’ll still be close enough to center to ski park without being throw off
14076384:animator said:Go 170. It has a 14m radius and will give a more stability than the 164. -3 refers to the center of your boot being 3 centimeters behind the center of the ski
14076387:Alvinb said:What's the difference between the faction prodigy 1.0 and the faction candide 1.0
14076618:LukeTheWaffle said:If you're doing all mtn is say a prod 2 would be better
14077593:Alvinb said:Which ski would be best for carving, head caddy, head framewall or faction prodigy 1.0?
14077593:Alvinb said:Which ski would be best for carving, head caddy, head framewall or faction prodigy 1.0?