J.O. Pro how is it

SilkyJohnson

SilkyJohnson

Member
is it strictly park or is it good for groomers and moguls because of how narrow it is. Also what about rails does it base hold up well. Just let me know what you guys know about this ski
 
I would say it more for jumps cuz the waist is dam skinny fro rail but they do hold up on them.
 
funny how people like wider skis for jumps...

but yeah its a great ski on the groomers and moguls...as long as ur using them on hard pack they rip the shit out of it
 
it may be a good ski, even a great ski but it looks cheap to me. This years model writes sex tips in lads mags like fhm etc.

Therefore to put a picture of a cheap slag on your skis makes them look cheap and nasty in my opinion
 
Some really conflicting points of view in this thread!

My thoughts

-They have excellent construction, really durable like all mid-top end HEAD skis.

-Fairly stiff - great to use out of the park.

-Even with the narrower waist, the added stiffness would probably offset the stability on landings

-Dimensions make for a great jib ski

-Super light + Centremount - low swingweight
 
n609175191_2394936_5269.jpg


 
i have the 09 jo's....i love them..i have them center mounted with 09 mojo15's. There are sick an groomers, park and jumps..SUCK in crud and powder( i know there only 77 under foot) but I took them out last saturday (it snowed almost a foot, wet snow though) and they were hard to control and turn. ( once again, I know there not pow skis) but for groomers, park and jumps there awesome. I thought they would be different for landing, there not bad at all..real stable on the landing...
 
It depends on personal preference but overall i dont like it cuz it's too skinny. 83mm is what i like
 
There stiff, but not real stiff....Have you ever skied the k2 seth/ the seth is sfiffer than the jo's
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top