This seems like an Ipod political statement, but I'm not sure how to interpret it. Either it's emphasizing the size and overall awkwardness of larder hdd music players, and in that way making an argument that the nano is way better... or it's saying that any rational person would gladly put up even with ridiculous size and crappy battery life if they could just get a few more %*#@ gigs of storage space, because the nano just doesn't hold enough music. I can't really tell.