If you are going to vote...

You already had the capability to do that. It just came wide scale news when he took credit for it. A gun carriers permit has been around for a very long time, not 3 years.
 
Right, so he did something right, which you said he didn't.

He ordered a very risky strike that Donald Rumsfeld failed to order at Tora Bora. So that's one thing.

Plus, the economy is improving (albeit slowly), not getting worse.
 
False. The EESA of 2008 was passed under Bush. Obama has added over 5 trillion without even counting the bailout. As for the first part, he's gutting the military while using the special forces as a pawn for his political ambitions. All the information gathered on Osama was done using measures implemented by Bush. That same prison in Cuba he campaigned on shutting down was the source of the information. So yea, I definitely give Obama the credit.

The recovery is bullshit. We're seeing record oil prices, in part due to Obama's piss poor decisions on domestic energy (blocking essential pipelines and drilling while spending taxpayer money on a bunch of bankrupt solar companies). There is absolutely zero confidence in him. Having oil prices at record levels will drive the economy back down.

His only two "achievements" are obamacare and the repeal of don't ask, don't tell. Well done!
 
Incorrect. Concealed carry of firearms in national parks has only been allowed since 2010. I even looked it up on a pro gun website to be sure.
 
Dear my rich white republican skiing colleagues ,

you realize Mitt sucks right? And is totally going to lose right? If these "things" were such big issues for you perhaps you should have picked a better nominee.

Let me put it this way. Romney has 0 field offices in Michigan, Obama has more than 20. This election will be won and lost on ground game and Romney has none. Barring another total economic collapse, Bammerz is going to cruise to a win.

 
Seriously, feel free to talk shit on Obama for being a "community organizer" but he out community organized McCain and will do exactly the same against Romney.
 
Doesn't matter if Obama wins the race. If the house remains right wing then it will be ok.

Also another question, why have so many democratic politicians, governors, large scale supporters and so on quit jobs, quite politics, backed out, everything that is subjected to quiting. They realize that Obama is giving them a bad name and they are trying to get out before they can be apart of the blame.
 
D's are poised to make big gains in the house this year, in fact it might even switch back.

R's have an advantage in the house in that they are defending less seats, but the seats the D's are defending are relatively strong or so far facing weak opponents

as for washington, isn't it a mosty blue state anyway?
 
uhh ya in a wild life reserve... the only reason you would need one their is if you got attacked by an animal. All they are doing is allowing people who already had carry permits to bring it into wildlife reserves. never heard news about that regarding Obama.

Do more research though. You'll dig deeper and uncover that it wasn't Obama, but really the Republican house and congress.
 
Holy misinformation batman.

"The EESA of 2008 was passed under Bush"

Your point?

"Obama has added over 5 trillion without even counting the bailout."

Obama wasn't president when the (wall street) bailout was passed, so why would we count it? The debt has gone up because Obama was handed a recession and government spending is how you get the economy out of a recession. He didn't do enough of it though, and as a result the recovery has been weak.

"he's gutting the military"

Absurdly untrue. Our military budget is grossly bloated, plenty of cuts can be made without "gutting" it.

"All the information gathered on Osama was done using measures implemented by Bush"

False. The actionable intelligence we got on the location of OBL was gotten through conventional interrogation methods. When they tortured KSM, he didn't give them anything. Torture doesn't work.

http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Military/2011/0505/Military-interrogators-Waterboarding-didn-t-yield-tips-that-led-to-bin-Laden

 
I feel that if you cannot explain the Laffer curve you have no right to call yourself a true conservative, just as I believe that you're not a true liberal if you cannot explain the views of John Maynard Keynes

 
"All they are doing is allowing people who already had carry permits to bring it into wildlife reserves. never heard news about that regarding Obama."

In other words, gun rights expanded.

"Do more research though. You'll dig deeper and uncover that it wasn't Obama, but really the Republican house and congress."

No shit sherlock, that's why I said "under Obama." As in, it passed when he was president and he signed it into law.
 
If Obama gives Democrats a bad name I can't even imagine how bad of a name Palin, Santorum, and Bachmann give the republicans

Also, you Republicans must be idiots to think Romney is going to beat Obama, the democrats are going to win. Until the republican party starts producing some legit candidates they are probably going to keep loosing.
 
regarding another issue. Being that this is a ski website and knowing that a lot of people on here are HUGE about buying your own stuff and not getting nice equipment through your parents. You guys say you should work hard and earn what you have and want. ok but from what I understand, a huge portion of NS is democratic. Democrats tax the shit out of the rich and pass it down to the poor for sitting around doing nothing. People say they can't get a job, yet just this pass week i have applied to dozens of jobs. The occupy people are the laziest fucks in the country. They want everything handed to them. Think about it in another way like GPA.

watch this video.

inb4 its fox news so you can't rely on it.

fox news is the worlds #1 news station and the fact that they call people out all the time like CNN, and those people don't reply back says a lot. It's funny cause my history teacher is democratic and gets sources from the colbert report and the daily show... fucking really. dumb bitch.
 
haha

My economics professor had a sit down lunch with Stiglitz, Krugman, and Obama before he was sworn in to beg for more Kenyesian stimulus....

needless to say his views were not honored and we are where we're at

now he's on like the Euro council of economic advisors
 
Ron Paul is the only good candidate for the Republicans and is unfortunate that he is going to probably loose to Romney. Democrats will probably win but the house and congress will remain right wing.
 
ya lets have no government, rules or anything and see how that goes. It's your kind that are behind the occupy movement and are getting tons of extremely negative publicity.
 
<div>&lt;iframe width=&quot;560&quot; height=&quot;315&quot; src=&quot;http://www.youtube.com/embed/VK93nBYmMDI&quot; frameborder=&quot;0&quot; allowfullscreen&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;</div>
 
is fox news the only source you could find for your views? not Wall Street Journal? or Commentary? or National Review?
 
I didn't go around citing the Huffington Post so at least give me the courtesy of having to actually respond to a legitimate view on on of your issues.
 
Seriously, I'm over educated and bored and drunk and in the Pacific Daylight Timezone, let's go...........
 
I chose fox news cause i saw this the other day on tv. Its 11:00 and I'm doing hw so I'm not trying to research this on other sources. sorry for not playing your way. But if you say fox news is not a reliable source then you are very wrong. Your only comeback is to say they are bias, just like every single other source in the world.
 
well how technical do you want to get with this?

the interview process was started under the bush administration, they used tactics to interview these terrorists that Obama as since outlawed. Obama wants to give these poeple taht are not citizens miranda rights, well he did actually.

The only thing Obama could get credit for is ordering the attack, if it wasnt for Bush they wouldnt have gotten information from the couriers.

yes, Obama is anti-gun. Luckily that hasnt been one of his top priorities and with the republican house it would never pass anyway. This is a good thing since we obviously have some bigger issues then gun control right now.

 
You are a fucking idiot Obama did not kill Osama, Navy Seals killed him. They had been tracking him since Bush was in office that had nothing to do with him. And that is absolutely not true it was not a result of anything Bush did that caused our recession, that would have happened no matter who was in office it was a result of our foreign policy, sorry but you just come across as stupid, just stop posting.
 
I really don't understand anyone being naive enough to call themselves a liberal or a extreme conservative. It really is not about that you should vote based on who is the better candidate not because they belong to any particular party. This is why idiots like Obama get elected because people think a Democrat will do better than the Republicans did and because it would be "cool" to have a black president. The problems in our economy are a result of policies that were put in place almost 20 years ago, virtually has nothing to do with Bush or Obama they both didn't take the right course of action to fix our economy. Small fluctuations are created by Obama by increasing our debt, but all his policies will just be temporary, he isn't doing anything to change the big picture. We are still on a very bad path economically and politically.
 
Loling at all the repub fags arguing with John... Obama has done better in his term thatn most politicians would. Shut the fuck up.
 
You are over educated? Damn that was a waste of money....

funny-science-news-experiments-memes-happy-birthday-einstein.jpg


Take a hard look at that and rethink your bone-headed political ideals.
 
Do you realize the stupidity of what you just said?

>"it was not a result of anything Bush did"

>"it was a result of our foreign policy"
 
You do know that your boy Reagan was in office 20 years ago, right? So was Reagan good or bad? make up your mind....

Oh wait, you know nothing of macroeconomics. Your read a fancy article in Forbes, bashing obama, thought it sounded legit (without understanding the greater context of Reagan-onmics), and you post it here. Let me guess... you've probably read Ayn Rand and think she's pretty cool too, huh?

 
I'm sure you won't watch it but just on the off chance that you decide to educate yourself.

/images/flash_video_placeholder.png

 
Actually that is false I said almost 20 years ago, Reagan was in office 1981 to 1989 last time I checked that equals 23 years ago. If you are going to try to insult me you should probably learn to use subtraction. I am referring to Bill Clinton's foreign policies that opened free trade with China, he made it nearly impossible for our businesses to compete with companies based out of China paying wages next to nothing. This in effect let China profit off of the US market, while devastating our economy. He essentially made China a super power at our expense.
 
.... eh, Clinton open up trade with China, yes. But China is not a superpower, they're too export dependent, and don't have enough domestic demand to keep they're economy afloat. And China has not devastated our economy. We run a trade deficit with them, and they own over a trillion in T-bills. But their currency is tied to ours, they need us to keep they're economy going. They can't sink our economy without destroying they're own. They also invest TONS of money into US capital. If anything we're in a mutually beneficial relationship. I mean... GDP went up after we opened trade with them.

I'd also argue that US economic decline is more correlated to a lack of reinvestment in manufacturing and agricultural industries. We also let Wall St run amok and torpedo themselves.... I'm not the biggest fan of Clinton's policies, and yes, his polices have had unintended consequences, but I don't think China is one of them. I think fear of China is slightly irrational
 
They are definitely dependent on us, but it is not mutually beneficial in the slightest. It is a one way deal they sell to the US for much less than any of our businesses can sell for and they monopolize many industries we once dominated. Clinton did nearly exactly what Obama is doing, making policies that improve our economy in the short run but have negative long term affects that will just make the next president look bad. He gains support from idiots that see small improvements in statistical information and think automatically - Oh our economy must be doing better. But nothing has been improved at all.
 
This thread is fucking amazing, Crowley (or whatever the fuck your name is) we get it. You are a hardcore republican that would probably suck any republican presidents dick. You also seem to be butthurt at the fact that the majority of Americans are not going to vote Romney. Like I said before, until the republicans come up legit candidates they are going to continue to get their asses kicked by the Democrats.

Oh and most of you seam to forget that a lot of americans are fucking idiots. How many people voted obama for the sole reason of him being black? A shit ton. How many americans vote republican because they are fucking hicks that think the republican party stands for guns and beer? A shit ton. American politics are a joke and need to change. Oh and in case anyone is wondering, I'm an American.
 
You obviously haven't read any of this thread. I never said for anyone to vote for Romney, I am not a republican. Quality Post thanks for the contribution to this thread..... fucking retard.
 
I read the entire thread and you have been choking on republican dick the entire time. If you honestly thought making a thread on NS telling kids not to vote for Obama was a "quality post" then you are the "fucking retard". This is NS, half the people here can't vote/ don't know shit about politics.This thread has gone no where and should just be deleted.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top