If you are going to vote...

Im writting this guy in on my ballot. I think its for the best.

governator-01-large.jpg
 
There was a documentary about how fox news is so ridiculously biased and they sent a reporter to the regan presidential center or whatever to cover his birthday and there was no one there haha.

The vote is definitely the lesser of two evils; I definitely like Paul's foreign policy platform, but the fact that he's against abortion totally gets me. I'm neither for or against it, but at least give someone the right to choose.

I guess I'll vote for Obama, but maybe I'll just not vote; I don't really feel like I'm a part of American anyways, though I'm a citizen.

In the end, let's face it, the political machine is a media hype-wagon; in 99% of cases, presidential policies aren't going to affect my daily life--I think it's more important to elect a state representative that is more aligned with your views and know how to contact him/her. That way if there's a specific piece of legislation going through congress (that won't end in gridlock) you can send an email or call them. For instance, I contacted my senator about a bill that would affect public transportations, parks, and walkable cities--this is important stuff that affects my daily life so I made a point to share my views.

To the Dutch guy and those arguing him: I'm willing to bet that he certainly knows as much about our politics as we do because, essentially, they come from the same source. The media is all the same, just presented in light of said organization's biases. Kudos for stepping up and presenting a logical argument; our foreign policy is absolutely ridiculous, we have no right being the world police and enforcing our ideals on others, and we are in no way better than others, personally, I'd argue we're far worse.
 
Hahahaha you don't know shit about me. I may be a little liberal but I agree with many views that republicans do as well. One very basic simple example, I am 100% for guns (like I a simple example)
 
wait, seriously?

idk man, he married into the kennedy family, ruled california for 10 epic years, and saved the only hope for our future. if that doesnt qualify him to be president, then idk what does.

He might be the most succesful human of the past 100 years. Id follow him into battle any. fucking. day.

and this is how he would fix the economy:

fucking awesome!

 
I haven't really read anything about the whole fox debate on here, but the only thing that's sure is that the American media are shit. The whole media are owned by Jews (and I'm not saying that as a bad thing) but and is just bad. CNN (which is also ruled by Jews) is ok, but for the best news you shouldn't be reading American news.
 
At least Obama isn't quite as bad as Harper up here in Canada.

Just within the last couple days proof finally came out that the robocalls misleading known NDP and Liberal voters so they wouldn't go to the right voting station indeed came from a Conservative.

That is serious election fraud and could easily be the reason they won a majority.

Also that's the kind of shit you expect in Soviet Russia, not in Canada.
 
you realize that the president has to sign every law, and this website just makes it look like he's personally responsible for every law congress creates.
 
Section 1 article 2 of the US constitution says that you need to be a "natural born citizen" to be eligible for the presidency. Arnold Schwarzenegger was born in Austria and is a naturalized citizen. You'd need to amend the constitution for him to be eligible.
 
Is there any information about the demographics of the people included in the "not in labor force" category? I think that would be an interesting metric to look at (especially if they have it over time).
 
you know what man, just leave. your political views are clearly wrong and you don't know shit about economic herps and derps so just stop talking.
 
Because a label exists for people who don't think Obama was born in the USA, and that label is called "birther."
 
haha, i guess the label for you would be complete idiot. seriously, though. you are the reason everyone inside canadia and out hates french canadia.
 
As someone who has spent a fair amount of time studying politics in the state of California I am severely disappointed by Arnold's leadership. He swept into power under such a mandate to reform and change the errors of his predecessor and really was not able to accomplish that much. He still resorted to the same sort of kick the can down the road accounting tricks which change nothing but make it harder in the future to make proper spending and cutting decisions.

With someone who many people thought might actually be able to work with both sides and accomplish great things, disappointing.
 
Here is what I really don't understand about birthers. His birth announcement ran in BOTH Honolulu newspapers. It was so much of a conspiracy that they had the newspaper editors at the time of his BIRTH involved, knowing that decades later he would run for president?

You know who actually wasn't born in the United States? John McCain. No, seriously, he wasn't.
 
First of all, *you're

Second of all, yes, I am. I was born in San Diego. I've never been to french canada.
 
Typical NS political thread.

White, upper-class, suburban 15-year-olds with conservative businesspeople for parents posting threads supporting Republicans.

Move along, folks. There's nothing to see here.
 
There's also a fair amount of paulites, (paulies?), environmentalists, and legalizers (weed not immigrants) and the rare liberal academic

But, mostly white suburban kids with republican voting parents
 
Um, no.

I've been around NS since 2009. It still follows the same pattern it did then. It's not even just political threads where it comes out, either.
 
Granted I haven't been on NS that long, but most of the ones I've seen seem to be composed primarily of conservative viewpoints.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top