13400442:Boax said:Mount for how you ski, deal with it on the skintrack.
13400442:Boax said:Mount for how you ski, deal with it on the skintrack.
13400444:Literature said:Best advice going right here. Quoting for emphasis.
Be sure to calibrate your thinking about "how you ski" to the terrain and situations where you're planning to use the setup. For example, I don't ever worry about trying to center mount with tech bindings, because I'm not interested in skiing switch on them.
13399259:cydwhit said:I'm on the 112's with Gaurdians mounted 2.5 back and they've been great
13399549:VD. said:There isn't really much point in mounting further back for skinning efficiency when the ski's got a fairly generous twin rocker profile.
13400442:Boax said:Mount for how you ski, deal with it on the skintrack.
13400444:Literature said:Best advice going right here. Quoting for emphasis.
Be sure to calibrate your thinking about "how you ski" to the terrain and situations where you're planning to use the setup. For example, I don't ever worry about trying to center mount with tech bindings, because I'm not interested in skiing switch on them.
13517973:whiteboi said:So coming back to this thread, I'm going to be using these skis as much if not more inbound's than out of bounds/touring skiing. Would I still be able to ski bigger lines comfortably if I mounted these skis at center? The reason why I am wondering this is because I will also be using them for a lot of booter sesh's, skiing switch, and jibbing, and I can't afford another pair of pow skis at the moment
13400442:Boax said:Mount for how you ski, deal with it on the skintrack.