qazwsxedc34
Active member
The DNC is a dumpster fire at this point.
Hilary is just great
- Thread starter qazwsxedc34
- Start date
qazwsxedc34
Active member
[url=http://
qazwsxedc34
Active member
[url=http://
TheFlyingJew
Member
13707088:.Hugo. said:
look at her eyes, that women is a fucking loon
she looks like she got beat up by a motorcycle gang
[img=]http://img.ifcdn.com/images/a44dc8d79c64f03e6c7999e92f0df50b8501000eb5d6ead2d0b796bc3432a2a5_1.jpg[/img]
qazwsxedc34
Active member
at this point i'm offing myself
arnie_grape
Active member
13707088:.Hugo. said:
she looks like she would do just fine in prison
TheHamburglar
Active member
13707135:Campeador said:Look at those dead eyes.
looks like she got hit in the face with a shovel as a child
snowpocalypse
Active member
13707170:Titus69 said:
Its not that many of us want her. We are just scared to death of Trump. There is no winner in this election. This is truly the election of the genitalia. You have an Ass Hole and a Twat.
qazwsxedc34
Active member
13707182:SVmike said:
Totally because Trump doesn't want to restore relations with Russia. Trump is a goon but he is nowhere as dangerous and corruptible as Hilary is.
qazwsxedc34
Active member
13707170:Titus69 said:
I honestly believe in the next 10 years a civil war could emerge, of course after our government takes our televisions away
snowpocalypse
Active member
13707187:fuckmekevin said:
Hay man I'm not here to tell you what you already believe. Nobody is going to change anyone's mind here on NS. They both suck, I'm not happy with any choice. They both lie through their teeth. They both are corrupt as shit and they both don't give a rats ass about the general populous.
Titus69
Active member
13707182:SVmike said:
Good point actually, I mean at this point I wouldve just gone with Bernie but he lost, and I dont care (eh) what trumps policies are unless theyre just stupid or racist, he just seems like the guy who goes too far too soon and starts some type of attack within our nations borders. When was America ever even "great"
13707188:fuckmekevin said:
I dont see either candidate being very good, seems like the cons are either even or outweighing the pros
arnie_grape
Active member
13707230:B.Gillis said:
congratulations, you're our mexico.
Laurent.
Active member
I do love the sudden anti-wikileaks narrative based an blatant lies suddenly being pushed after the DNC leaks.
Such as this and this for example.
They used to be the liberal darling of the free press but now when they show to be neutral they are the axis of evil.
Assange literally doesn't give any fucks, and I applaud him for it.
[img=]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5a/Julian_Assange_(1).jpg[/img]
Such as this and this for example.
They used to be the liberal darling of the free press but now when they show to be neutral they are the axis of evil.
Assange literally doesn't give any fucks, and I applaud him for it.
[img=]https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/5/5a/Julian_Assange_(1).jpg[/img]
MIHoodlum
Member
I like guns and hate abortions but I'm not about to run out and vote republican. Although Bernie is one of the good ones nothing will change until more baby boomers move on. I'm not voting for Clinton, I'm voting against trump and the baby boomers Republican Party. Most the people I know voting trump had mean dads or picked on growing up.
.MASSHOLE.
Active member
Despite what some of you may think, I am not a Hillary supporter and frankly, in almost any other year, I would probably be more likely to vote GOP.
But, that being said, this year after Trump announced his potential nominees for the Supreme Court, it reaffirmed to me that I could not, under any circumstance, vote for him.
It is possible that this President, who may or may not serve 8 years, has the potential to fill at least 1, and possibly 2 others (Ginsburg and Kennedy are likely to die/retire). We all know that, assuming the GOP retains control of the House, and the Dems retain control the Senate, the Presidential nominee will likely be gridlocked for at least the first two years. That leaves one avenue to substantial reform; the Supreme Court.
The last 50 years the SC has been a conservative majority, and if it returns to a liberal majority, there are quite a few things that can finally get done. This includes campaign finance, immigration, equal pay, fire arms, gay marriage, and many other topics that have gone unnoticed during this Presidential campaign season.
People tend to forget that the SC contains a lot of power for they are the sole body that determines that constitutionality of actions that the government, businesses, and individuals can take.
If it were any other election year and you lived in a swing-state I would tell you to vote for whomever you like, be it a Republican, Democrat, Libertarian, Green Party, or hell, even Vermin Supreme. But this year I implore for you to consider the future and whether or not you want a liberal or conservative SC. SC justices can serve for life, until they retire, or resign, and because of this, they ultimately will have more of an impact than Hillary or Trump will in the long run.
But, that being said, this year after Trump announced his potential nominees for the Supreme Court, it reaffirmed to me that I could not, under any circumstance, vote for him.
It is possible that this President, who may or may not serve 8 years, has the potential to fill at least 1, and possibly 2 others (Ginsburg and Kennedy are likely to die/retire). We all know that, assuming the GOP retains control of the House, and the Dems retain control the Senate, the Presidential nominee will likely be gridlocked for at least the first two years. That leaves one avenue to substantial reform; the Supreme Court.
The last 50 years the SC has been a conservative majority, and if it returns to a liberal majority, there are quite a few things that can finally get done. This includes campaign finance, immigration, equal pay, fire arms, gay marriage, and many other topics that have gone unnoticed during this Presidential campaign season.
People tend to forget that the SC contains a lot of power for they are the sole body that determines that constitutionality of actions that the government, businesses, and individuals can take.
If it were any other election year and you lived in a swing-state I would tell you to vote for whomever you like, be it a Republican, Democrat, Libertarian, Green Party, or hell, even Vermin Supreme. But this year I implore for you to consider the future and whether or not you want a liberal or conservative SC. SC justices can serve for life, until they retire, or resign, and because of this, they ultimately will have more of an impact than Hillary or Trump will in the long run.
theBearJew
Active member
13707096:TheFlyingJew said:
Ideally she too will perish in a volcano.
13707188:fuckmekevin said:
TV nobody watches TV, they gotta take away unlimited Data and Wifi.
.MASSHOLE.
Active member
13707550:JGWI said:
Biden is the equivalent of your friends grandfather that everyone loves because he is just so quirky.
It certainly helps they actually have influential politicians speaking and that the key figures in their party, despite the recent controversies, are not speaking out against their candidate.
qazwsxedc34
Active member
13707550:JGWI said:
You mean this Joe Biden? Always follow the hands.
A grandpas hands gives dem pedophile vibez
onenerdykid
Active member
13707182:SVmike said:
This is definitely how I feel about this shit show as well. Hillary is not who I want to lead this country, but she is someone who would keep the ball rolling in generally the right direction. There is no reason to think that she won't be a continuation of Obama's policies, which aren't perfect but also won't set us back 50 years of social progress, equality, and human rights. Let's at least get her in the office now and start planning something better for 2020.
13707187:fuckmekevin said:
All of his statements and "plans" disagree. His pics for SCOTUS are abysmal with literally life-long negative consequences, he wants to limit the First Amendment, he is a blatant racist & misogynist who will only worsen racial & cultural tensions, he opposes same sex marriages, he wants to overturn Roe v Wade & defund Planned Parenthood, he seeks to set back voting rights, he denies that man-made climate change is real, and his blueprint to run the country is modeled exactly after his failing businesses. This is not a recipe for success by any reasonable account. In fact, I would argue that his plans for this country would wind back a lot progress we've made in the last 50-75 years and this is incredibly dangerous.
I'm no hillary supporter...
but I will vote for her if it means keeping that weirdo out of the white house.
but I will vote for her if it means keeping that weirdo out of the white house.
qazwsxedc34
Active member
13707659:36ChambersOfWu said:
I don't usually agree with Watson but that video was spot on.
Eastcoastskier95
Member
vote paul heyman for president
qazwsxedc34
Active member
13707608:onenerdykid said:
Also, I wanted to point out that the DNC appears to be unified on the television but from listening to various delegates this does not seem to be the case. First off, half of the people there were paid to clap and appear as if Hilary had an avid crowd of supporters. They also took all of the TPP signs away and there's footage of security guards stopping Bernie supporters from re-entering. Not only that but the whole convention you saw on the television was laughably edited so that all heckle and booing was censored and with it all objectors and protesters.
And what do you mean, keep the ball rolling? You mean more wars, strife and exploitation; more corporate power, less regulation? Hilary Clinton's campaign is funded by the bankers who orchestrated the 2008 financial crisis by her husbands repealing of the Glass–Steagall's affiliation provisions, in which Bill passed the Gramm–Leach–Bliley Act. Clinton has also expressed predilection for the Trans-Pacific Partnership, of course she flipflopped on this position after realizing that the common person disagrees with the secret constitutes within the trade agreement itself. This is the reason why Obama was so eager to fast-track it and tirelessly pushed the vague narrative that the TPP will CREATE jobs here at home. Wasn't this also said to be one of Nafta's advantages? The TPP would merely promote off-shoring of American jobs.
Obama even pushed this same agenda on the Jimmy Fallon show. Do not think that Clinton, especially when you look at her voting records would nay this trade agreement.
The TransTrans-Pacific Partnership positions corporate power over governments, giving corporations more ascendancy to maximize profit. Hilary will be merely the write off for these corporations. In the TPP draft papers there are 29 chapters, only 5 deal with traditional trade issues. Most would set rules on non-trade matters that affect our daily lives: food safety, internet freedom, medicine costs, job off-shoring, financial regulation, and more.
Some examples, include domestic policies would be required to comply with its rules and these same corporations behind SOPA have pushed to insert its most pernicious provisions into the TPP, something Hilary and Bernie have supported. This will ruin net-neutrality, an example being violations as simple as the creation of a YouTube video with clips from other videos, even if for personal or educational purposes or mandatory fines be imposed for individuals' non-commercial copies of copyrighted material. So, downloading some music could be treated the same as large-scale, for-profit copyright violations. Policing user data be it corporate backs or government backed, if they did not like something they could simply shadow-ban or kick you off the internet. I forgot to mention that Trump does not support this trade agreement, although you never know with politicians, they all flipflop when they realize they don't have as much power as they think they do.
The scariest pages of the TPP would empower corporations to attack U.S. Policies in Foreign Tribunals and demand taxpayer compensation for our environmental and health.
Other disadvantages of the TPP include:https://wikileaks.org/tisa/
-The Trans-Pacific Partnership Would Undermine Food Safety
-The TPP would require us to import meat and poultry that do not meet U.S. food safety standards.
-The Trans-Pacific Partnership Would Ban "Buy American" and "Buy Local" Procurement Preferences
-The TPP would provide large pharmaceutical firms with new rights and powers to increase medicine prices and limit consumers' access to cheaper generic drugs. This would include extensions of monopoly drug patents that would allow drug companies to raise prices for more medicines and even allow monopoly rights over surgical procedures.
-The TPP would also empower foreign corporations to directly challenge domestic toxics, zoning, cigarette and alcohol and other public health and environmental policies to demand taxpayer compensation for any such policies that undermine their expected future profits.
-TPP would empower foreign pharmaceutical corporations to directly attack our domestic patent and drug-pricing laws in foreign tribunals.
-The TPP would provide big banks with a backdoor means of rolling back efforts to re-regulate Wall Street in the wake of the global economic crisis, hmmm.
-The TPP would prohibit taxes on Wall Street speculation.
-The TPP would empower financial firms to directly attack these government policies in foreign tribunals, and demand taxpayer compensation for policies they claim undermine their expected future profits.
-The TPP could sharply increase U.S. exports of natural gas - creating incentives for more fracking. This could be Great for our economy but at what cost to the environment?
-The Trans-Pacific Partnership would Undermine Public Services - Affecting Utilities, Transportation, Education and More
Trump has said countless times that he supports gay marriage and the LGBT community; and no I do not support Trump nor will I be voting for him. He is not racist and most people take his words out of context. At least he has yet to engender Geo-political strife, war and destabilization like Hilary and the Obama administration have so brilliantly done and how has trump set-back voting rights, I mean I would guess that Hilary and her rigging of the election has something to do with it? Electronic voting is easily rigged and has been occurring here in the United States for quite some time, so I mean that isn't too surprising.
qazwsxedc34
Active member
http://votesmart.org/candidate/biography/55463/hillary-clinton13707608:onenerdykid said:
Please, read and understand what Hilary supports and what she voted on. This is a non-partisan database.
GayWolf420
Active member
13707634:WildBANimal said:
yeah im at this point. given the choice of a turd or Hilary, id vote for a turd but trump getting in means all of the pretty important progress made since the early-mid 1900s is down the shitter (keeping it within bathroom puns lol).
Hilary still sucks, though. Its a dead fucking horse but these politicians really are delusional if they think they are relating to the "common man/woman" by whipping around in Secret Service motorcades, staying in the nicest accomodations, flying around in jets, and making insane amounts of money. Why cant you fuckers with money accept the fact you are rich and stop trying to be all humble about it? you fuckers aren't like us.
TheFlyingJew
Member
Anonymous says they will release Chelsea Clinton nudes and a sex tape
[img=]http://media.vogue.com/r/w_480/2012/08/img-magazinechelseaclinton1_113938654326.jpg[/img]
[img=]http://media.vogue.com/r/w_480/2012/08/img-magazinechelseaclinton1_113938654326.jpg[/img]
Twinjibber77
Active member
LOL'd when they all said they wouldn't put the sign outside their homes
onenerdykid
Active member
13707710:fuckmekevin said:
As I've said numerous times in numerous threads, I don't think Hillary is the best candidate for POTUS. She is a goon and I don't like her. She looks like Star Wars villain. But she isn't about to lead civilization off a cliff. And when I said "keep the ball rolling in the general direction" was more of a nod to the improvements that Obama has made over Bush to keep us away from said cliff. Again, not perfect, but headed in the right direction which I can say and also not be in favor of the TPP. I fully agree with you on that last point.
But you couldn't be more wrong about his stance with the LGBT community- he is in favor of the First Amendment Defense Act (FADA) which allows LGBT people to be more subject to discrimination. He also prefers that marriage be defined as man and woman because he's a "traditional guy" and would "strongly consider" appointing SCOTUS judges who would overturn the same-sex marriage decision.
http://www.hrc.org/2016RepublicanFacts/donald-trump-opposes-nationwide-marriage-equality
Trump is a racist because he makes judgments based solely on people's race, not what they've actually done- it doesn't get more textbook than that. Saying that a US judge cannot preside over his lawsuit because he is of Mexican heritage is a complete ad hominem attack lacking any evidence of actual bias. He's not wearing a white hood, but that is a racist statement and he makes them all the time. And this was not a single, out-of-character moment- he makes these statements often and repeatedly. Yes, some are taken out of context by an insane media, but to say that Trump is not a racist fails to objectively examine his statements.
Trump has also embraced the Republican positions of voter ID laws and restricting voter registration, both of which set back a US citizen's Constitutionally protected voting rights. The fiascoes with the primaries are different yet related- we should be making it easier for citizens to vote. It's absolutely clear that work can be done by both sides, but Trump (and the Republicans) are actively pursuing ways to make it harder for US citizens to register and be able to vote.
Additionally, prior to 2015, Trump held a plethora of different opinions and he's changed them all now. He was pro-choice, now he's pro-life; he was a fan of Obama, now he's not; he thought the wealthy should pay more in taxes, now he thinks they should pay less, he used to favor more gun control, now he favors less, etc. etc. He's no different than any other typical politician who flip-flops to earn votes. This is not a quality that only belongs to Hillary. And frankly, I really don't care what politicians thought 10-years ago. I care about what they are running on/for now, and while Hillary is far from perfect, Trump is closer to "worst".
13707690:B.Gillis said:
It's either that or feeling the johnson... and anyone who knows me knows that if I was interested in voting for Ron Swanson, I'd vote for Ron Swanson.
Gods_Father
Active member
13707918:onenerdykid said:
That's actually is to ensure that only citizens can vote...
TheFlyingJew
Member
this mother fucker needs to be jailed
he has raped more women than Bill Cosby and is a sick fuck that is a danger to society
how much drugs was Wild Bill on during this speech? a few months ago the guy looked practically dead and people were questioning his health
he has raped more women than Bill Cosby and is a sick fuck that is a danger to society
how much drugs was Wild Bill on during this speech? a few months ago the guy looked practically dead and people were questioning his health
Gods_Father
Active member
13708043:S.J.W said:
Haha I guess you're fine with illegals voting then.
S.J.W
Active member
13708053:Gods_Father said:
Clearly you didn't watch the video. Out of over a billion votes cast there was 951 votes that could be classified as voter fraud. Majority were due to social security number mix ups or technical errors. 31 votes couldn't be accounted for. 31 out of a billion votes. Loving your cognitive dissonance here
. If only you were more worried about political donations from superpacs and lobbyers that influence how legislators vote than 31 votes that don't make a difference
arnie_grape
Active member
13708053:Gods_Father said:
1. they don't
2. doesn't fucking matter if they vote. you guys have 300 million citizens and you picked the two shittiest dummy giraffes in the retard safari to represent your country. way to go fuckwits.
Gods_Father
Active member
13708072:S.J.W said:Clearly you didn't watch the video. Out of over a billion votes cast there was 951 votes that could be classified as voter fraud. Majority were due to social security number mix ups or technical errors. 31 votes couldn't be accounted for. 31 out of a billion votes. Loving your cognitive dissonance here
The Washington post commented in an article on a Harvard study about non citizens voting and said, "most non-citizens do not register, let alone vote. But enough do that their participation can change the outcome of close races."
More than 14 percent of non-citizens in both the 2008 and 2010 samples of the study indicated that they were registered to vote. Some voted...
"Our best guess, based upon extrapolations from the portion of the sample with a verified vote, is that 6.4 percent of non-citizens voted in 2008 and 2.2 percent of non-citizens voted in 2010,"
Gods_Father
Active member
13708072:S.J.W said:
Thought you're voting for Hillary?
S.J.W
Active member
13708081:Gods_Father said:
You're referring to this article yes? To where they explain limitations to the study and didn't single out illegal immigrants but rather non citizens. There's a difference. But as far as I'm concerned if you live in a country and you pay taxes you should be allowed to vote. I know the real reason you don't want non citizens to vote. Non citizens vote democrat and you don't like that. What if non citizens tended to vote republican?
https://www.washingtonpost.com/blog...ld-non-citizens-decide-the-november-election/
13708082:Gods_Father said:
Actually I'm a Bernie supporter. He vowed to over turn citizens United. But Hillary is the lesser of two evils and has said she will over turn citizens United.