The title doesnt quite match up with what Yauch is saying here. The title says this, but in the thread he complains that the ams part is what ruined the competititon. Which one is it or was it both that Yauch didnt like?
I didnt get to watch the competition. I am in no way agreeing with the title of this. However, I guess my question is if the general consensus in this thread is that it should be a mix because pro teams are mixed, and girls can perform just as well as the guys, then why the need to create a rule to force each team ton include 1 girl?
While I am all for equality, its rules like this in life that promote the exact opposite of their good intent. Equality is not forcing a team make up based on race or gender. Equality means everyone (no matter race or gender) has the same oportunity (by being judge of their skills on the same scale) for those spots on a team with no regard to gender. What if(theoretically) the top 5 skiers are all male...Is it fair or "equal" to that 5th skier who loses his spot because a team had have a female skier? Have you ever seen a rule that says "Every team must have at least 1 male skier?" no because there
Don't get me wrong I love watching chicks doing sports I love. However, if were talking about equality, why not just allow each company send their best 5 skiers? If this is 5 girls so be it. If its 5 boys so be it, and if its a mix great! But why do you have to "force" teams do include a "girl"...If you were one of these girls on these teams, would you feel like you were there because of your skill or because the team "had to have a girl" on it? Not saying that the girl didnt deserve to be there...But, if there was no rule in place and a girl or two or 5 were on the team then they know they were there because of their skills and not to meet some stupid rule.
Just some food for thought...