Have you ever thought that maybe your constitution is to blame for the situation? Have you ever looked at other countries, and wondered how come 350 people don't get shot dead every day in them, but in the US they do? Maybe if it weren't for the US constitution, the gun laws would long ago have been changed, and you would have the same situation as those other countries with more restrictive gun laws. But you just have to hold on to the constitution. Why is that? I mean, the times were different when the constitution was written. I don't think anyone is going to up against the government in arms because they feel oppressed by them. I know it's never actually going to happen, but wouldn't it be time to change the constitution already? It just isn't pragmatic or applicable to modern life anymore. Let's think about Europe for example. They are making a constant effort to become more and more peaceful and united, and their gun laws are very restricted. Let's assume that in a 100 years or so, Europe will have no guns on the streets, and others will have followed their example. Except USA, who are still running around with their guns, shooting each other like the wild wild west because their precious second amendment says so. USA will be seen as a barbarian, backward country. Of course it already is, but even more so.
I know this is just wishful thinking, but it really would be high time the second amendment be changed. I also know I'm going to get killed saying this, so let it rip...