Gay nsers

Brock.

Active member
So this is a pretty taboo topic, but I'm drunk and don't really give a fuck.

This "community" is full of the stereotypical homophobic "ew faggot" kind of bullshit. The whole masculine thug thing that runs rampant among members of this website is rude and ridiculous. My question to NS is, how many of you have ever had a homosexual experience or any kind of thoughts of that nature. Scratch that, do any of you even support it?? I doubt any of you will admit it, considering the whole NS thing runs basically counterculture to the gay community. I'm not trying to make a statement, I just want to turn this into reasonable discussion.

**This thread was edited on May 20th 2014 at 12:55:03am
 
I have no reason not to support it. Do what you want, it doesn't matter to me.

Serious question, OP are you gay?

To my understanding there are a few gay members on NS..
 
Yea I haven't been on here in a while so I don't know if things have changed. But yes I'm gay
 
you're gonna get a ton of comedians trying to be funny by calling you a fag or whatever, so expect that.

that being said, im in full support of the gay rights movement. and i feel anyone who is against it is simply a bigot who is standing in the way of equality.
 
12997790:lineskier10 said:
ns is probably the least homophobic place on the internet

yea seriously, I try n bash some queers with mah boyz and the mods break out the equality shit...

(no doubt this thread is going to be a giant shit storm)

QqTVzb3.gif
 
12997796:Brock. said:
Yea I haven't been on here in a while so I don't know if things have changed. But yes I'm gay

Is it offensive when people make jokes saying "OP is a faggot" or "OP is gay"

I see it all the time, and its obviously not for homosexual reason why they call OP gay. Does something like that offend you or do you not care because people are just being idiots?
 
Also, like 6 posts in and the word f@gg-t has been used like 12 times, this shits prob going to get deleted
 
i agree with you, and i try not to perpetuate that cycle here of all places. I have many many gay friends, male and female. I grew up doing gymnastics and was called gay constantly growing up, which i never understood because the guy/girl ratio was always 1:60. i've never doubted my sexual orientation but i am open enough with my sexuality to be comfortable in homosexual situations, be it serious or for humor. I worked at a pub(my boss is a lesbian actually) for the last year and was offered all sorts of acts of sexual depravity and would just say thanks but no thanks, there is no need to freak out.

last night i was hanging out with a gay friend. he can dance beyonce's "single ladies" almost better than her. it wasnt a date, he knows im straight. It is just really wonderful to actually hang out with someone who is genuinely 100% themselves and comfortable in their own skin. i have always had so much respect for him. i can only imagine what he has put up with his whole life.

as for support, it doesnt really affect me in any way so why would i even care. i think people have the right to pursue happiness, and if having a relationship with a person of the same gender makes them happy, then by all means, be happy.

*crosses fingers and hopes that in the ten minutes it took to write this, the thread hasnt turned to gay bashing and is actually a reasonable discussion*
 
IMO there's nothing wrong with homosexuals so long as they aren't extremely flamboyant about it. I'm talking dudes in fishnets and heels spanking eachother in public. If it's not okay for a straight couple to do that what makes it OK just because someone is gay?
 
12997820:uyghur said:
IMO there's nothing wrong with homosexuals so long as they aren't extremely flamboyant about it. I'm talking dudes in fishnets and heels spanking eachother in public. If it's not okay for a straight couple to do that what makes it OK just because someone is gay?

I literally have never seen that happen
 
12997816:STNW said:
Yea satire was the wrong word. I think its rather a mockery of people who do harbor thoughts of homophobia and choose to insult people by using the word "faggot". Thats just me though, I'm sure people have a variety of interpretations of NS

its all good. i just feel as if anyone that uses faggot and claims "they're just joking" really is homophobic. why else would they use that term, you know?
 
I fully support the gay community but the majority of my friends do not. My uncle who is getting married in a few months is gay so I was brought up to be tolerant of any sort of "different" sexual orientation. However, I'll often describe someone straight who is doing something to upset me as a faggot. Idk, I guess the straight community is desensitized to that word because it is used so much. Well whatever, there's my two cents.
 
In really surprised nobody has mentioned Reese (loveninja) or Wyatt ( Arabian). The former is gay and the latter a transsexual lesbian (forgive me if cis privilege lead me to use the wrong term for your gender identity, Wyatt). Anyway, I have friends who happen to be gay and I fully support the movement. Just because NS is good by the internet's horrific standards doesn't mean it couldn't be substantially better.
 
Seriously cannot wrap my head around the fact that people can be against the fact that somebody likes someone else. Who cares if its a boy, girl or a tree. Love the shit outta that tree if you want im all for it.
 
12997836:DeebieSkeebies said:
its all good. i just feel as if anyone that uses faggot and claims "they're just joking" really is homophobic. why else would they use that term, you know?

Because it is funny, if you dont see the comedy in calling someone gay for doing something that isnt at all gay then you need to loosen up
 
I'm actually pleasantly surprised at the comments so far. And yes reese is my homie, I was just trying to spark a debate because I don't think this has ever been openly discussed in an somewhat open manner so far.

And yea I'm drunk on a monday night. Get at me.
 
12997881:cool_name said:
Because it is funny, if you dont see the comedy in calling someone gay for doing something that isnt at all gay then you need to loosen up

Nah I just think you have a shitty sense of humor
 
12997881:cool_name said:
Because it is funny, if you dont see the comedy in calling someone gay for doing something that isnt at all gay then you need to loosen up

Doing that perpetuates a negative association with homosexuality just like words like "bitch" and "cunt" do for women and like "pussy" does for the gender binarism.
 
12997889:yoski. said:
Why is there anything with wrong being "homophobic" in todays society?

Just cause I think it is disgusting for a man to make the choice to stick his penis up another man's excrement hole doesn't mean I'm a terrible person. It is a sick lifestyle choice that I don't approve of.

I hate how the homo supporters are like EQUAL RIGHTS for EVERYONE, except for people who don't support them. Hypocrites.

who said "no rights for homophobes"? no one has really said that at all.
 
Gay to me is meh, I'll still say something is "gay" because for my whole life calling something "gay" meant lame or stupid or whatever, it never was a homophobic slur. Fag and faggot is something I'd like to see eliminated from vocabularies but I know plenty of people who still say it in non-homophobic ways... but thats not the point. If you were a homosexual and you heard people tossing faggot and queer around, you'd be decently uncomfortable.

I think as a society in the usa, were still in a big transition point for homophobic slurs because well there are tons of people who still hate gay people. It'll probably be awhile before calling someone a faggot will be as frowned upon as calling someone a nigger.
 
12997891:DeebieSkeebies said:
who said "no rights for homophobes"? no one has really said that at all.

Not at all supporting what he said, but I think hes referring to the belief that they dont deserve freedom of speech. Which obviously isn't exactly applicable to private matters.
 
12997893:ElGato said:
"stick their penises up other men's excrement holes".

╚═( ͡° ͜ʖ ͡°)═╝

╚═(███)═╝

╚═(███)═╝

.╚═(███)═╝

..╚═(███)═╝

...╚═(███)═╝

...╚═(███)═╝

..╚═(███)═╝

.╚═(███)═╝

╚═(███)═╝

.╚═(███)═╝

..╚═(███)═╝

...╚═(███)═╝

...╚═(███)═╝

.....╚(███)╝

......╚(██)╝

.........(█)

..........*
 
The whole use of "gay, homo, or even fag" as a slur has been decreasing in outside life, but on the internet it's ever prevalent. If it's directed at me that isn't in an attacking manner (ie: calling me homo and adding on to it with other slurs) I don't mind it as much. But when it's used to attack and make me feel bad I'm totally against it. I'd like to see the use of it as a slur be eradicated, but even having less people use it is fine by me.
 
12997889:yoski. said:
Why is there anything with wrong being "homophobic" in todays society?

Just cause I think it is disgusting for a man to make the choice to stick his penis up another man's excrement hole doesn't mean I'm a terrible person. It is a sick lifestyle choice that I don't approve of.

I hate how the homo supporters are like EQUAL RIGHTS for EVERYONE, except for people who don't support them. Hypocrites.

Stay charming and ignorant see how your grandchildren laugh at you when you say this in fifty years.

12997894:pussyfooter said:
Gay to me is meh, I'll still say something is "gay" because for my whole life calling something "gay" meant lame or stupid or whatever, it never was a homophobic slur. Fag and faggot is something I'd like to see eliminated from vocabularies but I know plenty of people who still say it in non-homophobic ways... but thats not the point. If you were a homosexual and you heard people tossing faggot and queer around, you'd be decently uncomfortable.

I think as a society in the usa, were still in a big transition point for homophobic slurs because well there are tons of people who still hate gay people. It'll probably be awhile before calling someone a faggot will be as frowned upon as calling someone a nigger.
Bold n-bomb usage. I can sympathize; it's hard for me to avoid charged language but making a conscious effort is within all our grasps. Hell, four years ago, I tossed around "retarded" all the time. I hope I can look back in four more and say the same thing about many other similar words.
 
12997897:Phil-X- said:
Not at all supporting what he said, but I think hes referring to the belief that they dont deserve freedom of speech. Which obviously isn't exactly applicable to private matters.

Even that, I haven't heard much about. If anything, there is the same amount of both gay and homophobic talk across the board. just seems like more anti-gay talk without anything to back it up with.
 
12997883:ElGato said:
Explain the humor to those who are too "uptight" to appreciate it.

because it makes no sense, and shows the whole ridiculousness of how seriously people take a word

12997889:yoski. said:
Why is there anything with wrong being "homophobic" in todays society?

Just cause I think it is disgusting for a man to make the choice to stick his penis up another man's excrement hole doesn't mean I'm a terrible person. It is a sick lifestyle choice that I don't approve of.

I hate how the homo supporters are like EQUAL RIGHTS for EVERYONE, except for people who don't support them. Hypocrites.

go ahead and believe that it is up to you, i will think you are stupid, but you are entitled to think it. You are also allowed to think the world is flat and once again i will think you are stupid.

but that is given that in the process you don't infringe on the freedom on anyone who supports or is gay.

i do think it is ironic you are against gays when you come from a class that was suppressed just as much, maybe more for just as superficial of a reson
 
12997906:domeinthebutt said:
inb4 threesome with you, me, and australopithecus

Oh gosh, I think I ranted about this notion to Sean the other day. Bi ≠ threesome haha
 
12997890:*CUMMINGS* said:
Doing that perpetuates a negative association with homosexuality just like words like "bitch" and "cunt" do for women and like "pussy" does for the gender binarism.

well my friends and i will use straight in the exact same way. so, i guess we are perpetuating a negative connotation on being straight as well
 
12997908:immas said:
Oh gosh, I think I ranted about this notion to Sean the other day. Bi ≠ threesome haha

well i'm not bi and i'm down for a threesome... that's not what i was getting at.
 
12997909:yoski. said:
Why shouldn't it be applicable to private matters? There is a huge double standard if someone where to get fired because they choose to be gay people there would be a law suit at the bear minimum and possibly criminal prosecution( in the united states at least). But if someone thinks that the choice to be gay is not a correct one they can be fired with no repercussions whatsoever. The blur between speech and non-discriminatory charastics is very strong. You only know someone is gay because they tell you, that is a form of speech.

#bigots

There's so much wrong with this post, ignoring the multitude of spelling and grammatical errors. Let's start with the idea of one's sexual preference being a "choice". You're wrong there. It's also fairly easy to make implicitly obvious you are homosexual without explicitly stating it. Finally, being homophobic isn't inherently a valid reason to be fired.
 
12997909:yoski. said:
Why shouldn't it be applicable to private matters? There is a huge double standard if someone where to get fired because they choose to be gay people there would be a law suit at the bear minimum and possibly criminal prosecution( in the united states at least). But if someone thinks that the choice to be gay is not a correct one they can be fired with no repercussions whatsoever. The blur between speech and non-discriminatory charastics is very strong. You only know someone is gay because they tell you, that is a form of speech.

#bigots

if someone thinks it is choice or even says it is choice they dont agree with that is fine, but if they act upon that belief and infringe on someone's freedom through that then of course there should be repercussions.
 
12997913:yoski. said:
I never said I wanted to infringe on the freedoms on anymore who thinks they are gay. That should be obvious. (marriage is not a freedom btw)

I find it moronic and naive that you think the "suppression" towards homosexuals is anything near what has happened to African-Americans, or Hispanics, or native americans.

I find it moronic that you're so unaware of what happens to homosexuals in Africa, much of Asia, and the Middle East.
 
12997910:cool_name said:
well my friends and i will use straight in the exact same way. so, i guess we are perpetuating a negative connotation on being straight as well

It's a little different from the gender binarism but it still assumes a "typical" behavior so it's not ideal. There are certainly much more harmful things to say, though.
 
12997917:*CUMMINGS* said:
I find it moronic that you're so unaware of what happens to homosexuals in Africa, much of Asia, and the Middle East.

this. This isn't just a America thing, dude. just because they aren't severely oppressed over here doesn't mean it's not occurring.
 
12997913:yoski. said:
I never said I wanted to infringe on the freedoms on anymore who thinks they are gay. That should be obvious. (marriage is not a freedom btw)

I find it moronic and naive that you think the "suppression" towards homosexuals is anything near what has happened to African-Americans, or Hispanics, or native americans.

i never said there was anything wrong with just thinking it, i said go ahead. How isnt marriage is freedom though, killing someone is a freedom, everything is freedom. However some freedoms may infringe on someone else's freedoms and only those are the ones that someone should be allowed to restrict, the most obvious being murder.

Why is moronic, because one is harder to hide? They are both just as ridiculous, you are restricting someone's freedom for how they are even if they have no choice about it.
 
12997925:yoski. said:
Dude, I live in Africa for most of the year. I am well aware of the human rights abuses directed at LBQTUZNAWUCOAS. I did not condone them. But comparing a limited few incidents of discrimination to thousands of years of enslavement and wholesale destruction of people by the billion and their culture is nothing compared to what homosexuals have faced.

does that make one more acceptable than the other?
 
Back
Top