First off, I did read your post. I thought it was the only one that was relatively good. I just didn't address it in my post. I guess I will with this one. You completely misunderstood many of my points.
1. Homeless. It's not an issue of energy usage. It's an issue of safety. It's not limited to homeless either. Its the idea of the streetlights of the city going off, the parking lot lights of the store going off, and its about the notion of safety that light gives one when one is walking down a street(Streets with lights on in the homes where people are actively engaged with the street prove to have lower crime rates than those where homes are concealed from the streets. In this case lights off gives the impression no ones home). Again, its a safety issue.
I am not worried about a drought. Again, another point you clearly misunderstood. It's an example of how costs will only increase with utilities when there is a decrease in demand. Cities lose revenue from it and raise taxes to compensate. This is from when there was a drought in Durham and Raleigh, NC. It's very simple, and i already explained it.
[Stop reading if you just want to read about earth hour. this is somewhat unrelated]
You have a very distorted view of the stock market and restructuring. This earth hour is about global warming and the false idea that humans are responsible. I dont see the direct relevance to the stock market. Anyways, our economic system does not need to be restructured. Many parts of THE NEW DEAL (although some helped), PROLONGED THE DEPRESSION BY 7 YEARS. All that needs to happen is a break on capital gains taxes, and corporate taxes reduced by a lot to encourage spending and investment. (Corporations by the way, basically do not pay taxes. They pass those taxes on to their employees by lay offs, decreased salaries. They also pass it on to consumers by raising prices and other ways too). The problem with our economy was the government interfering with banks with loans and such. If all that bullshit hadn't happened, we wouldn't be here today. I guess if there's a restructuring needed, its that. But the restructuring is THE GOVERNMENT GETTING OUT OF THE PRIVATE SECTOR.
3. accidental children. It's going to happen. It happens with power outages. It is small. It wasn't a very serious point, to be honest, just something to think about. AND ARE YOU FUCKING SERIOUS? You're really going ad hominem with this? "But maybe you are still trying to confuse or trick (since that seems to be your technique after reading your post) a girl to sleep with ya" Considering the fact that I could still be a virgin and waiting till marriage didn't cross your mind...(Oh but this kid doesn't believe in earth hour. HE MUST BE A RAPIST!)vvI don't even see where you get this. It has no relevance to the argument at hand and it shows your lack of class, integrity, and ability to make a strong argument. At least stay on point. It's obvious its a decision to have a child. But you dont think shit happens? Look at the disgusting number or abortions done each year. Either a lot of people didn't mean to have babies, or there is an exceptionally large population of people who change their minds very often. This one hour will have more people having sex. and there will be an increase, maybe not by much, but there will be an increase. watch.
4. You used the word ignant...seriously? dont attack my arguemts. use a real word and stop being a conformist.
Finally Your other post...
While I understand what your saying about seeing the results of everything on a large scale. This isn't the same thing. Not even remotely close. I dont think showing results from one hour with many people not turning on lights is applicable both realistically and scientifically to compare with other data on a broad range of electrical usage. I somewhat agree with your point, but thinking of people seeing the results from this little project, I dont think, will really translate to people reducing their energy usage altogether. Its completely different to call for everything to be turned off than for things you dont need-to be turned off.
"help persuade the people that can help get these projects underway, but get more and more people backing the ideas."
this quote to me is kind of scary. At what point in the persuading does the government step in and say, " Mandatory power outages at this time, or you can only comsume this much electrity." Obama has already said something similar,
"We could set up systems so that everybody in each house have their own smart meters that, uhh, will tell you when to turn off the lights."
When does it get to the point where the government is turning your lights off for you? That's what he's offering about these smart meters. They are going to have government mandates requiring you to switch to these. (it will be free. exactly like going to digital tv). people will think its great. It will just end in more government control of YOU, of all the people. We do not need to live in fear of the government. THE GOVERNMENT SHOULD FEAR US.