Dynastar vs. line

S

SkiUnit03

Active member
what company makes better freeskis? i just got in a debate with three other of my friends about which company makes better skis and why, so please post your opionion and why you think it.

also what ski is better, the chronic or the trouble maker and why?

'collars up are officially gay, but layering 2 polo shirts is still acceptable'

-ATLANTASKI

'r u sayin we r being censored by da goverment?

fuck pussy dick suckin lip
 
Dynastar has more money, n knowing Mikael kinda desgin the ttrouble so they listen to their riders, dynastar would have to be my choice, but i've never tried any line skis so...

Rip more talk less
 
its like, 6 to one, and a half dozen to the other. line has cap construction, but nice tip height, dynastar has shitty edges, but awesome flex, amazing performance in the pipe, both have a progressive stance

jack.

www.libertyskis.com

"mr. treehorn treats objects like women, man"

lets go bowling.....

"you dont have to be a rocket surgeon or something" -pj cliche
 
dynastar, the team is soo ill and i love the belan pro and i had the 1260's and he belans blow it out of tha water.

_________________________________________

I love boobs

AMBUSH CLOTHING DROPPIN OCT 1!!!!

 
but the edges that dynastar has are complete shit....line skis blow out of the park but they dominate park at least

 
Hahahahahahahahahaha.

Wow. The fact that this thread exists is a slap in Jason Levinthal's face.

Line. This isn't even close. Dynastar skis are absolute shit, and won't be any better next year because they have no apparent desire to improve anything that's clearly horribly wrong with them. Dynastar's skis suck, dynastar's company sucks and the fact that they sponsor Corey Vanular, who is admittedly freaking awesome, doesn't do enough to cover up their shitty, shitty product.

The fact that their team manager decided to explode himself on the front page of this site a few months ago doesn't help much either.

 
thats because th 1260s suck..they are the worst line ski

kick there ass, drink there bear and steal there women

 
Wow thats a big comment

I bet uve never even riden dynastar skis, they go really well n the beland are amazing n i skied all year with them n no problem at all with my edges. they aren't that bad i haven't heard much people komplaining about them recently, fag

Rip more talk less
 
Lately?! You're an idiot! They're the same skis as they have been for years, the Belan is IDENTICAL to this year's TM, last year's TM, and NEXT YEAR'S TM! Compared to pretty much every other ski on the market they suck... and they're the only skis that consistently deserve their reputation for durability issues.

 
Trouble makers have to be the biggest piece of garbage ever. If you want to see a ski spontaniously combust while sliding rails, get trouble makers. Actually there is one ski that is worse that the trouble maker, it was called the Concept. The pow-air is a close third.

 
dynastars are sick. They did a little edge work on next years but the beefier sidewalls/edges will come in the 06/07 season. Line has some good mid/fat skis but i wouldnt be caught dead on their skinny stuff

http://www.Free360XBOX.com/?r=18913397

Free Xbox 360, it actually works, from the makers of gratis networks. if your going to sign up anyway do it through me

 
ar-six has no idea what he/she is talking about. ive ridden lines, and ive ridden dynastars. first off, ill be the first to say that the edges were pretty junk. i had TMs last year, and blew out 25 cm on one of the edges. this year i had the Belans and i didnt have 1 cracked edge. i skied more, skied harder, and slid twice as many rails. the flex on the dynastars are unmatched, and you can actually ski them outside park. lines are good park skis, no doubt about that, but anywhere outside of park, they blow. even in pipe, they cant hold an edge up a wall worth shit. they have pretty good edges, no doubt, but the flex pattern is disgusting. they have absolutely no support if you dont land perfectly on them. ive never ridden, their fattys or mid-fats, just the park skis, but i hear the bigger skis are actually pretty good outside of park. but either way, in the park and pipe, its no contest. dynastar blows line out of the water.

_________________________

just ski.
 
Line edges break out really easily too. I've skiid Lines and i can't stand them. they are skinny and poopy, and the bindings always tear out. Troublemakers have a shitload of pop and perform awsomely in powder. I use my TMs for rails skis and I haven't borken the edges out. I am begining to think that TM edges only break out if you are doing huge gap to down rails and crazy shit.

I live in a place far far away, where on occasion the telly tubbies will come to play....and that's when Ma gets out the shotgun. Damn critters climb in our gutter system all the time.
 
line all the way.

the tms are good skis but the edges fall apart in 2 weeks maximum.

Line is good shit way mroe durable

and line as way more skis than dynastar.

rock yo shit

*NS Skateboarders Cult*
 
Line is shit. too narrow.

I live in a place far far away, where on occasion the telly tubbies will come to play....and that's when Ma gets out the shotgun. Damn critters climb in our gutter system all the time.
 
What the fuck are you talking about? Line too narrow? The Tm's waist is still about 75. Have you ever heard of the prophet? Dynastar's new "fat" ski has a 92 waist. WOW! So wide and progressive. You don't even have an argument.

 
next year theres wide chronics

_________________________________________
_

______''

Anything that makes snow deserves more respect than my mommy''- Giray

I HATE NY PRODUCTIONS

 
I'm sorry, your screen name starts with Dynastar, you've never ridden any line ski aside from their park twin (assumedly just the 1260), and I'M THE ONE WHO HAS NO IDEA WHAT HE'S TALKING ABOUT? Of course the 12s suck outside the park, they're the bargain economy ski. If mean something like the old darksides, then you're trying to compare line of today with line of 3-4 years ago and you once again are out of your element, Donnie. Of course they suck in pipe, they're noodles. Ski some Pollards or the new Prophet 100s (if you have the snow for it) and then make a new comparison. The only reason I can think of for owning a TM is that you have such a diverse quiver that you can actually justify owning a pipe-only ski... For anything else, they suck huge balls.

Who here has that kind of quiver? Anybody?

 
LINE they make skis that keep there edges after a single rail

------------------------------

"Now, Iannick Broulette, if that is your real name, I noticed your wearing an orange coat, would you call yourself the orange master?"

"uhhh, I dont,... uhh, no I don't think so"

Freetle Cody while interveiwing Iannick B at last years Orage Masters

"Cut your Board in Half and do it again and we'll give you a t-shirt"

Dave Chrihton after the snowboarder greased the c-rail at D-Camp

 
aside from edge issues, talking about skiing preformance, dynastar kills line.. not even close

`
 
ok ok Lines skis aren't too narrow but I have skiid them and I dont like the way they feel. and TMs are 78 at the waist. The whole TM edge thing is totally exaggerated. they're not THAT weak to the point where they will break completely off in the first day.

I live in a place far far away, where on occasion the telly tubbies will come to play....and that's when Ma gets out the shotgun. Damn critters climb in our gutter system all the time.
 
AR-6 does know what he's talking about unfortunately. And if you think the skis have pop, you haven't skied them long enough--they noodle in no time. Someone who just left their team will tell you that. I used to sell them to kids and that was the second biggest complaint (second only to "the edges fell off in the first month").

I'm not going to go into it, but Dynastar also had a nasty habit of selling heaps of products in an area through "newschool" reps without telling the stores who sold their product in those areas--this is a dickhead move towards local ski shops, and once the shops found out as the kids trickled in with their dynastar skis (wanting to have them mounted), the shops were not very happy. dynastar kept the program going, and tried to hide it by scrapping the website and telling reps to keep it on the d-low, even after the stores caught on and wanted them to stop.

 
Ar-Six just owned everyone supporting Dynastar. He's dead on. I've ridden both the TM, '04 1260 and Chronic and I'd choose the Chronic anyday. I was considering buying Belans but I made my mind up I'd rather spend 350 on a different ski. Like 300 on a new Invader.

Now don't get me wrong, I'm not going as far as Ar-Six here to say Dynastar totally sucks, just in this debate, Line wins. The construction, development and overall performance of Line stuff wins out over Dynastar.

If you look at posts over the past two year, a ton of it has been about Dynastars edges and how they are blowing and cracking and breaking, while things on the Chronic are how "super sick" it is and how it rips everywhere.

There is a picture on here, but I can't find it. And it kinda puts the nail-in-the-coffin on the TM's edges. I'ts 4 or 5 bases lined up all with busted edges. Look for it.

Stay Classy Newschoolers
 
neither, armada

what's up now bitch

"the fatter you are the smaller you go"-unknown

ACLs suck
 
ar-6 got it down, plus line actually supports twin-tip skiing and puts effort into developing a better ski

 
also line has a shitload more skis to choose from. powder, all mountain, park, ect

'collars up are officially gay, but layering 2 polo shirts is still acceptable'

-ATLANTASKI

'r u sayin we r being censored by da goverment?

fuck pussy dick suckin lip
 
my vote is line, line basicly did what a park person is looking for, a durable edge that is double the other ones, perfect graphics, perect construstion, and the new invaders are going to be phat, wide for those huge landings, but also have that nice butter zone, bascily i think line is just 20x better than dynastars...

 
Found that pic I was talking about, as posted by BigKicker. Just look.

2072hahaha.jpg


Stay Classy Newschoolers
 
yeah dynastar hasnt changed their skis for a long time and i bet there keeing them the same for 06 too, line actually makes alot of different skis with different flex width and everything so you can tell line actually cares about skiing while dynastar only cares about monet

 
it depends on what kind of skiing you are gonna be doiun, if your spending your whole day in the park you should prolly go with line, theyll hold up better on rails and shit, but if like most people you want to be able to ski on your skis and not just be able to slide rails you want the troublemakers

 
Line's ski great out of the park. Ever used the Mothership? Or the pollard this year? Both sick all mountain skis. You can't say they are for park only.

Jibij Pro Shop

2714 28th St.

Boulder, CO 80301

303-440-1244

www.jibij.com

 
Let's do a brief comparison here...

Dynastar TM

-Thin base/Edges

-Weak construction

-Decent all-mountain

-Not noodly

-Half twin

-"Wood" core, according to the website... skeeetchy.

-Torsion box

Line Assasin

-Thin base / edges (sort of)

-Still well built

-Great all mountain

-Not noodly

-Half twin

-Birch macroblock core

-Cap... but very good cap; Quadraxial weave.

... Why would anyone buy Dynastar when Line's HALF TWIN is better?

 
If you don't do rails the TM's are as good as a comparable model in the lines (chronics). If you do rails their edges just aren't up to par with most other companies. TM's are great skis if you ignore their edges, which are a huge unignorable problem to most people.

 
I dont think you should be comparing the assasin since that is their all mountain ski and barley even has a twin tip

You can't hug with nuclear arms
 
nevermind i just finished reading your post

go line im getting the chrinics to replace my skogens

You can't hug with nuclear arms
 
The TM is a half twin, or just not equal like Line's park stuff?

Also, the Assassin, the HALF TWIN, isn't even built for park, its just to tear it up everywhere. Its great haha.

Stay Classy Newschoolers
 
i think what AR-six was referring to was the really low tips that the TM's have. they might be equal height, but it doesn't matter because the front and back are both SUPER low. my friend who rides TM's has had trouble a buncha times getting his tails caught in mushy snow.

my level of radness... it just can't... be quantified.
 
i dunno some friends ride TM's last year nd they haven't screwed the edges...i wonder if its the skiier..like if u try crazy shit? yeah but they have no probs with their TM's they love 'em

 
TM tails are raised 37mm, Line's true twin is around 55ish, and their directional twin (which is what assasins have) is in the low 30s. It tends to vary with production as to the EXACT height.

 
No see I really don't wanna read what all the other kids say...so don't mind me if i repeat...In my mind i believe that LINE has a better freestyle ski, and I will tell you why. Does Dynastar only make freestyle skis?NOOOO! They may have more money, but the thing is that they aren't just focused on the freestyle portion of there ski company. There fore my ski choice would have to be LINE

Swollen is the way to go, holla
 
wow tail height doesn't even matter when skiing the park. I used to worry about my tail height back in 4th grade and I was just picking up jibbing.

I live in a place far far away, where on occasion the telly tubbies will come to play....and that's when Ma gets out the shotgun. Damn critters climb in our gutter system all the time.
 
ive had dynastars and line .. my dynatsrs cracked all on the top sheet first year riding them it fucking sucked and they sucked for turning also the backs would always catch alot it was weird .. my lines ride so nice and NOTHING is wrong with them at all like they lok so mkint after 2 year of hardcore riding liek i take care of them clean and wax them all the time but i did the same with the dynastars .. only thing wronf would be the normal scraches wich are almost unavolidable unlesss you like plastic wrap the skis lol .. soline for sure !

---------------

Wake The Dead!

 
so far its 17 line to 7 dynastar my counting might be a little off however

'collars up are officially gay, but layering 2 polo shirts is still acceptable'

-ATLANTASKI

'r u sayin we r being censored by da goverment?

fuck pussy dick suckin lip
 
how about you stop being a pussy and buy dynastars, they are so sick. You wont be dissapointed, and i bet most of these kids have only ridden lines and thats what they are basing it on. BITCH NIGGAZ

the only post whore to break 10,000

 
dynastar makes hte worst skis around. they make htem shitty on purpose. ive ridden concepts nad tms and i want to shit on them. line dominates, no competition at all

--------------------------------

-Jon

go
to jibij
 
I've heard you make so many comments lately, espically on "when i stared jbbing" and the "all i care about it propoganda because its what i wateched first when i got into jibbing". I find that really funny actually, I don't know why, but I do.

But yes, tip height does matter, even in park, just its not a HUGE factory, espically compared to pow skiing.

Stay Classy Newschoolers
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top