Dynastar vs. line

it seems like the people supporting line are giving a shitload more reasons for what they think then dynastar.

'collars up are officially gay, but layering 2 polo shirts is still acceptable'

-ATLANTASKI

'r u sayin we r being censored by da goverment?

fuck pussy dick suckin lip
 
I don't only care about Propaganda. THat's just the year I started getting serious but I don't know what year that was.

I live in a place far far away, where on occasion the telly tubbies will come to play....and that's when Ma gets out the shotgun. Damn critters climb in our gutter system all the time.
 
neither

--------------------------------------

To
day I beat my previous record for consecutive days I've been alive.

-Ryan
 
line is 10 times better then dynastar. their skis are way more durable, way better marterial, and way better construction. honestly. and as for the chronic vs. the troublemaker. chronic wins hands down

the chonic has 4d fibercap core witch maximizes responsiveness through the ski

singleseam camp

macroblock core

a titanium powerband

and carbon olliband

real twin tip

3dimensionally die cut titanium laminate wrapped over the core where extra power is needed

fiber matrix

fatty base and edge

the chonic is so much better then the trouble maker no questions

 
dynastar's edges are crap but iv heard that lines blow apart and stuff in the park from hard landings and stuff

 
id go wiht line they seem to be better but i havent skied either of them thats just my guess from watching others and seeing the skis

 
bump

'collars up are officially gay, but layering 2 polo shirts is still acceptable'

-ATLANTASKI

'r u sayin we r being censored by da goverment?

fuck pussy dick suckin lip
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top