skierman
Active member
14484172:FreezyBreezy said:Bait harder
Defend your beliefs by name-calling other people harder.
14484172:FreezyBreezy said:Bait harder
14484175:skierman said:Defend your beliefs by name-calling other people harder.
14484173:FreezyBreezy said:And?
14484145:skierman said:I'm just curious what you mean by a "younger" skier. What makes someone younger?
14484187:BLandz said:Maybe the fact that they arent 40 years old you absolute fucking dipshit dumb fuck I thought u were smart skierman ffs let me down fr
14483981:kalle. said:i think it’s rad that fwt acknowledges a true legend of the sport. and it’s only a wild card for one stop.
tanner did stomp a huge triple back in the ritschs roll event so it’s not like he’s fading out in any way, i’m excited to see him ski
14484274:snowfinder said:Who cares if they toss in one big name to get some marketing/media. That skier waiting in his shadows can go drop a decent edit and get more attention than competing in the FWT.
14484266:Farmville420 said:Hank right, tanner the goat but I’d Rather see Levi, pnorvell, Jonah w, bennie smith, thayne or wachs any day and no bias at all
14484284:SavageBiff said:This, I really don’t think Tanner is taking away anything from anyone, like, he’s not causing someone to go un noticed, and if he’s beatin someone, then they just need to get better or give up cause he’s waaay past his prime
14484297:hank.ski said:There are hundreds of ams and probably a dozen pros who would love to have that spot. The wildcard is supposed to add a dimension of unpredictability. In Andorra, they invite a local dude with a day job. In Austria, they invited an FWQ winner and he smoked everyone. I think it's more interesting when they bring new faces into the fold
14484304:snowfinder said:Oh look a video about Tanner Hall has 20k views in 3 days. Why dont they add a real wildcard to the tour? This is why.
View attachment 1056394
14484317:Farmville420 said:Just because it makes sense doesn’t mean it isn’t shitty? I don’t think OP was asking why Tanner got the wildcard, but just that it’s stupid. Same with real ski, like yeah it’s funny and crazy cuz he’s old but real ski is a locked in tens of thousand views to a hundred something views and some dudes deserve that exposure wayyyy more than tanner did. He literally filmed a damn near backcountry segment and hitting two rails like it’s just annoying for kids actually trying to make careers or names for themselves
14484325:snowfinder said:Think the people that need to pay for these events care about some kid trying to make it in skiing?
14484331:Farmville420 said:Wow so jaded and edgy, ofcourse they don’t their actions show it every time that’s why ppl will complain every time they do some dumb shit
14484431:theabortionator said:Who cares about the FWT, get Tanner back on NS
14484437:thankagaper said:real freestyle skiing, on real mountains.
triple flips belong on aerial kickers, trained in bathing suits to perfect execution.
14484444:Rosbif said:I COMPLETELY AGREE
14484297:hank.ski said:There are hundreds of ams and probably a dozen pros who would love to have that spot. The wildcard is supposed to add a dimension of unpredictability. In Andorra, they invite a local dude with a day job. In Austria, they invited an FWQ winner and he smoked everyone. I think it's more interesting when they bring new faces into the fold
topic:hank.ski said:Tanner got his first tour wildcard in 2019. He did...okay. it was enough to requalify for 2020, but if you watched all the stops, you'll recall that he has a few standout lines, but fell on the majority of his runs over the course of those 2 seasons.
Then he got hurt, and he took time off. In the meantime, the FWT handed wildcards to Max Palm and Max Hitzig. One of them landed the first ever double flip in FWT history, and then did it again. The other one put down one of the most impressive runs that Fieberbrunn has ever seen.
And this year, they threw Tanner another spot, because they know it will boost views. And I think it's kinda lame. We've seen the level of progression and innovation that new athletes are bringing to the tour. To me, it's much more refreshing and exciting to watch a young, unpredictable fireball than to see Tanner fighting for his 10th comeback career or whatever. And this isn't an insult to Tanner's skiing, he has unquestionably transformed our sport, and he reliably still throws down. I just think that if he really wants to prove himself, he should qualify for the tour in the FWQ circuit like almost everyone else, instead of punching the ticket that could have been used to bring a unique, unseen perspective to the tour.
Thoughts?
14484269:SavageBiff said:He also landed on his neck, which I enjoyed waaaay more than the triple backie. Nothing he does looks smooth, he sets and looks like he’s stiff and afraid or taking a shit.
14484706:CT_CREW said:you are giving off some serious little bitch vibes.....
laughing at other people falling on a jump you would never attempt to hit, wishing crashes/injury on other skiers...nice work.
14484724:SavageBiff said:The dudes an asshole and idgaf what kinda vibes your perception tells you I’m giving off nor what you assume I would not do.
14484874:cydwhit said:I kinda sorta mostly agree. But I also think it's symptomatic of a bigger challenge the FWT faces.
I don't personally follow the FWT aggressively, I'll catch the highlight clips, but I'm not watching the live stream. However, I did watch several events live in 19/20 precisely because Tanner was competing and I wanted to see how he stacked up. So, if this is a marketing ploy, it worked on me. And for some reason, Durtschi's wildcard spot didn't motivate me the same way, I didn't care to watch.
And I totally understand what you're saying about opening up that spot to more young guns/talent that didn't qualify the traditional way, but I also think that's sorta the problem with my relationship with the FWT. It's hard to keep up with, there's not a ton of overlap between the skiers that impact my life, and the skiers on the tour, so I'm not watching. And it seems like a hard move to justify an established film skier, like many of the folks you mentioned, competing blind in variable snow just for whatever small bump they'd get from being in the FWT. Maybe I'm way off there, but it seems like a lot of risk and very little reward for most film skiers?
Anyhow, the FWT is sick, it's some of the rowdiest skiing you can watch, but somehow, for me at least, there's too much of a disconnect, it doesn't resonate with my experience as a skier, and it's not enough of an over-the-top spectacle to attract my attention either. But for some reason I can't fully articulate, I get way more hyped to watch Kings and Queens of Corbets, or a good video part than I ever do for the FWT. Maybe I'm broken?
14484874:cydwhit said:I kinda sorta mostly agree. But I also think it's symptomatic of a bigger challenge the FWT faces.
I don't personally follow the FWT aggressively, I'll catch the highlight clips, but I'm not watching the live stream. However, I did watch several events live in 19/20 precisely because Tanner was competing and I wanted to see how he stacked up. So, if this is a marketing ploy, it worked on me. And for some reason, Durtschi's wildcard spot didn't motivate me the same way, I didn't care to watch.
And I totally understand what you're saying about opening up that spot to more young guns/talent that didn't qualify the traditional way, but I also think that's sorta the problem with my relationship with the FWT. It's hard to keep up with, there's not a ton of overlap between the skiers that impact my life, and the skiers on the tour, so I'm not watching. And it seems like a hard move to justify an established film skier, like many of the folks you mentioned, competing blind in variable snow just for whatever small bump they'd get from being in the FWT. Maybe I'm way off there, but it seems like a lot of risk and very little reward for most film skiers?
Anyhow, the FWT is sick, it's some of the rowdiest skiing you can watch, but somehow, for me at least, there's too much of a disconnect, it doesn't resonate with my experience as a skier, and it's not enough of an over-the-top spectacle to attract my attention either. But for some reason I can't fully articulate, I get way more hyped to watch Kings and Queens of Corbets, or a good video part than I ever do for the FWT. Maybe I'm broken?
14484894:Film. said:So, Tanner is gonna have an outstanding year because of this thread and prove everyone wrong.
14484912:CT_CREW said:Weird man, I would think a backcountry oriented guy like you seem to be, would enjoy watching a tour live stream more than Corbets… not hating just observing…. I relate more to picking out the hardest line I could ride down a face, compared to meat bucking into Corbets. Although that is a fun watch too.
14484894:Film. said:So, Tanner is gonna have an outstanding year because of this thread and prove everyone wrong.
14484874:cydwhit said:I kinda sorta mostly agree. But I also think it's symptomatic of a bigger challenge the FWT faces.
I don't personally follow the FWT aggressively, I'll catch the highlight clips, but I'm not watching the live stream. However, I did watch several events live in 19/20 precisely because Tanner was competing and I wanted to see how he stacked up. So, if this is a marketing ploy, it worked on me. And for some reason, Durtschi's wildcard spot didn't motivate me the same way, I didn't care to watch.
And I totally understand what you're saying about opening up that spot to more young guns/talent that didn't qualify the traditional way, but I also think that's sorta the problem with my relationship with the FWT. It's hard to keep up with, there's not a ton of overlap between the skiers that impact my life, and the skiers on the tour, so I'm not watching. And it seems like a hard move to justify an established film skier, like many of the folks you mentioned, competing blind in variable snow just for whatever small bump they'd get from being in the FWT. Maybe I'm way off there, but it seems like a lot of risk and very little reward for most film skiers?
Anyhow, the FWT is sick, it's some of the rowdiest skiing you can watch, but somehow, for me at least, there's too much of a disconnect, it doesn't resonate with my experience as a skier, and it's not enough of an over-the-top spectacle to attract my attention either. But for some reason I can't fully articulate, I get way more hyped to watch Kings and Queens of Corbets, or a good video part than I ever do for the FWT. Maybe I'm broken?
14485324:hank.ski said:I have a few theories about this, bc 6ou aren't the only skier I know who feels this way.
-they need better marketing for the athletes. They should be providing extensive interviews, hosting season edits, etc.
-they need to be less harsh about backslaps and butt touches, like Natural Selection.
-they need to livestream the qualifiers too.
-they need to land verbier on espn
14485349:Brocka_Flocka said:They need to sell the rights to a streaming service and do a Drive to Survive sort of situation.
14485316:hank.ski said:$20 says he doesn't make the cut for Verbier
14485324:hank.ski said:I have a few theories about this, bc 6ou aren't the only skier I know who feels this way.
-they need better marketing for the athletes. They should be providing extensive interviews, hosting season edits, etc.
-they need to be less harsh about backslaps and butt touches, like Natural Selection.
-they need to livestream the qualifiers too.
-they need to land verbier on espn
14485324:hank.ski said:-they need to land verbier on espn
14485316:hank.ski said:$20 says he doesn't make the cut for Verbier
14483975:SteezyYeeter said:pronouns in bio