Burton gets owned

neon1peace

neon1peace

Member
If anyone got the newest issue of POWDER mag, turn to page 38 and enjoy. sorry if you dont get POWDER but I couldn't find a link to the article
 
i dont have a scanner but they just get ripped on for the whole poaching thing and how "rebellious" they are as a company when everyone who wears there expensive stuff looks the exact same. there are some other points too its pretty good
 
that just made my fucking year, sticky this shit when someone gets tha atricle on here

and to add to beef, who remembers when burton cut all tha Anon and RED skiers and hung them out to dry???
 
Thats pretty much what happened, if I get the chance Ill scan it or look more for a link but its worth the read if you can get your hands on an issue
 
Dear Jake Burton Carpenter,

On behalf of all your upper class, white costumers, i would like to thank you and your giant corporation for fighting the "fascist" depredations of four ski areas. Thanks for taking a break from making american express ads to take on this massive soure of human suffering and injustice.

a $5,000 prize to any snowboarder who provides video documentation of poaching the four ski resorts that as of last winter didnt allow snowboarding? that is impressive. I bet you make that much in 15 minutes of filming for your Hewlett-Packard commercials.

first 2 paragraphs
 
yea that guy owned them pretty hard, he basically ripped on them for trying to "fight the man" and be rebelious with that whole poacher competetion when they basically have a monopoly on the mainstream board market
 
Dear Jake Burton Carpenter, On Behalf of all your upper class, white cutomers, i would like to thank you and your gian corporation for fighting the "fascist" depredations of four ski areas. Thanks for takin a break from making American Express ads to take on this massive source of human suffering and in justice. A 5,000$ prize to any snowboarder who provides video documentation of poaching the four ski resorts that of last winter didnt allow snowboarding? That is impressive. I bet you make that much in 15 minutes of filming for your Hewlett-Packard commercials. Trying to create division where there is none in order to keep your brand "anti establishment" reminds me of Chevron talking about all the great things they do for the enviroment: it's self serving trash from the rich and powerful. Now that your monopolistic corporation has crushed all the small, rider-owned companies, its time to Fight the Man! When you catagorize these cki resorts as "facist" your likening them to dictorial regimes that systematically exploit and murder people. Considering that snowboarders as a demographic are among the wealthiest, freest, most privelaged on the planet, and that your sport and your fortune wouldn't exist without skiing, i think you can find a better cause. If you want to fight for human rights, start by moving all production out of china. The arguement for your cause is the same time and agian: "It's discriminatory! what if they didnt let black people ski there?" This arguement, besides insulting anyone who has benn opressed due to race, gender, religion, etc.. is pathetically shallow. You're as free to ski at Alta as anyone else. NO, you don't get to take your board on the lift, but you cant play Frisbee golf at a golf course, either. For the sake of brevity, let's say you can have Deer Valley as far as i'm concerned. Taos needed the buisness and I support their decision. Mad river Glen is owned by a cooperative of shareholders that govers as a collective body. You want to ride at MRG, either by snowboard or toboggan? Buy a share and bring it up before the board. Alta, on the other hand, is hallowed ground. It is the home and spiritual heart of powder skiing in America. Alta's pioneers of avalanche science, men like Monty Atwater, Ed LaChappelke, and Svere Engen had their lives on the line daily while creating the avalanche protocol that allows all of us, including you, to ride safely. In fact, Atwater was wounded while fighting actual fascism in the Army's 10th Mountain Division during World War II. The ski vs. snowboard fued was always propogated by gapers on both sides. You're ressurecting it now because you know that your company has become a mainstrem, corporate, static, conformist fashion show. When the kids who've been lining your pocket cease feeling rebellious because they all look the same wearing your expensive products, Burton is smoked. And for the same reason that China would be better off without a brutal monolithic regime running the show, snowboarding might be better of without Burton. - Hans Ludwig
 
this should be more aesthetically attractive

--------------------------

Dear Jake Burton Carpenter,

On Behalf of all your upper class, white cutomers, i would like to thank you and your gian corporation for fighting the "fascist" depredations of four ski areas. Thanks for takin a break from making American Express ads to take on this massive source of human suffering and in justice.

A 5,000$ prize to any snowboarder who provides video documentation of poaching the four ski resorts that of last winter didnt allow snowboarding? That is impressive. I bet you make that much in 15 minutes of filming for your Hewlett-Packard commercials.

Trying to create division where there is none in order to keep your brand "anti establishment" reminds me of Chevron talking about all the great things they do for the enviroment: it's self serving trash from the rich and powerful. Now that your monopolistic corporation has crushed all the small, rider-owned companies, its time to Fight the Man!

When you catagorize these cki resorts as "facist" your likening them to dictorial regimes that systematically exploit and murder people. Considering that snowboarders as a demographic are among the wealthiest, freest, most privelaged on the planet, and that your sport and your fortune wouldn't exist without skiing, i think you can find a better cause. If you want to fight for human rights, start by moving all production out of china.

The arguement for your cause is the same time and agian: "It's discriminatory! what if they didnt let black people ski there?"

This arguement, besides insulting anyone who has benn opressed due to race, gender, religion, etc.. is pathetically shallow. You're as free to ski at Alta as anyone else. NO, you don't get to take your board on the lift, but you cant play Frisbee golf at a golf course, either.

For the sake of brevity, let's say you can have Deer Valley as far as i'm concerned. Taos needed the buisness and I support their decision. Mad river Glen is owned by a cooperative of shareholders that govers as a collective body. You want to ride at MRG, either by snowboard or toboggan? Buy a share and bring it up before the board.

Alta, on the other hand, is hallowed ground. It is the home and spiritual heart of powder skiing in America. Alta's pioneers of avalanche science, men like Monty Atwater, Ed LaChappelke, and Svere Engen had their lives on the line daily while creating the avalanche protocol that allows all of us, including you, to ride safely. In fact, Atwater was wounded while fighting actual fascism in the Army's 10th Mountain Division during World War II.

The ski vs. snowboard fued was always propogated by gapers on both sides. You're ressurecting it now because you know that your company has become a mainstrem, corporate, static, conformist fashion show.

When the kids who've been lining your pocket cease feeling rebellious because they all look the same wearing your expensive products, Burton is smoked. And for the same reason that China would be better off without a brutal monolithic regime running the show, snowboarding might be better of without Burton.

- Hans Ludwig
 
best artica in this issue of powder, best line-

China would be better off without a brutal monolithic regime running the show, snowboarding might be better of without Burton.

hahahahaha
 
BURTON JUST GOT OWNED !

And I love the part where they say that they are free to go out to Alta and SKI. Maybe he should make some alta edition skis. Or if he really wants to ride there with his own products, all he has to do is to make some fat snowblades just like Shane did in Focused. Also, I hate the fact that burton is trying to play in the gore-tex world and make some high end jackets that cost a lot more than what they're worth. Reminds me of a GAPER bitch that used to work with me that bought a 800$ Burton gore-tex jacket in another shop while she had the opportunity to pay like 1/3rd of that price for a better jacket with her staff deals in our shop. And we carry some pretty legit compagnies like Helly, Mountain Hardwear, Salomon and Eider. I know that this last comment was a little out of the thread but all I've read here made my Burton hate go up and it had to come out.
 
burton is a big coreperate company and i bet they take over some of the small companies to. but what i wanna know is if a ski company does this??? like now with snowboarding a lot of my friends boycott burton cuz its to big of a coreperate and buy snowboards from small companies. do you think this can hapen in skiing? will a company like 4front get so big that they arnt cool any more and people will buy other stuff? strange to think about to cuz like, burton kinda invented snowboarding (i think) and probalby started off as a small "cool" thing. now they make to much money so their not cool? so does that mean that small ski companies like moment won't be cool anymore if they make a lot of money form skiing?
 
scary thought, i hope that it wont happen but most companies (even ski companies) get to the point where a profit outweighs what they started the company for and then they become like what burton is now
 
that was cool, he definatly destroyed burton. im all for snowboarders poaching these uptight ski resorts, i think its awesome, if you think about it, newschool skiing is much more similar to snowboarding than it is to the normal 50 year old groomer ripper's definition of skiing. so really we are more against these resorts banning snowboarding than with them.
the thing that pisses me off about burton's little contest is exactly what this guy pointed out, burton could be the biggest company in snow sports, its probably run by a bunch of old men who hire 25 year old kids to tell them what's cool. they are the opposite of a core "fight the big corperations" company. and they are trying to be all cool by telling kids to rise up against the big corperations.

so yeah this guy had a really good point, burton is the last company that should have a contest like this. but if it was some smaller core snowboard company i would be all for it and back the snowboarders 100%

plus i bet the guy that wrote that was like 50 years old and has never touched a park, us park skier's and snowboarders are all for each other, not against each other. you will never see a skier or snowboarder telling the other sport to get out of the park or call them fags for not being on their favorite amount of boards. but you will see conflicts between these old gapers riding through the park doing sick slalom turns infront of jumps and us park skier's and snowboarders. and the people banning snowboarders from their mountain are just that type of people that you see in the park getting yelled at or yelling at all the kids.

so all im saying is we are closer to snowboarding than we are to what these old men's definition of skiing is.
 
as a small business owner i have totally thought about this a few times. but the fact of the matter is is that most of the big ski companies are all owner by maybe like 3 or 4 larger companies like quicksilver owns rossi and dynastar and so on. so you just need to make the decision whether or not to be bought out and such.
 
as long as they dont try to monopolize the market theyre gonna be fine. burton sponsors so much shit and puts their shit everywhere. tell me one shop that dosent carry burton. Im pretty sure u can buy burton at target or walmart. They are the microsoft of the snowboard world, their stuff is good, but you get to a point where your absolutely sick of their product. They basically give their boards to mtns as rentals, they saturate the market to the point that ppl get sick of it. I would almost say the same thing for salomon (yes i know im gonna get some hate here but listen), nearly 50% of the riders at my hill ride salomon skis. 75% have some salomon product. now im not saying that salomon is bad, but since everyone has them, it makes me want to ride something else to be different from the crowd. Especially among the less experienced riders, they see that salomon has alot of great riders,and with jib academy, and a huge range of products, they assume that salomon is the "cool" stuff to use, paying no attention to product specs or how it rides. Burton is the same way, when the ppl start out they see shaun white riding burton everything, every part of his body has burton on it or a burton sticker. so they think that burton is the best just cause the best guy rides it. thus leading to an oversaturation of the market, and hatred by core riders.

but at least with skiing i think we have way more ski companies than snowbaording has board companies, i may be wrong but thats how it seems to me
 
eTo those who said about ski companies swallowing each other, as far as I know The biggest company in skiing is quicksilver which has rossignol, dynastar, lange, and look. Roxy too if you want to count it but I put that in with dynastar. Besides that the next biggest I know is K2 which has Line. I dont think ski companies care so much about a huge monopoly but rather just making a good product.

Burton makes good stuff too . Quality stuff at that. I have a hoodie and a backpack from them and both are really dope. But I think Burtons main objective is more to swallow the competition, in everything they can. Lets look at whats under Burtons umbrella:

Burton, Anon, Analog, RED, Gravis, AK, Ronin, Channel Island Surfboards, Habitat, Alien Workshop, Special Blend, Jeenyus snowboards, Forum, Four Square, and Reflex

I mean, really the only people they havent gotten yet is Ride, and the ski companies that also make snowboards. Its ridiculous. Basically, if you buy almost anything snowboard, your supporting burton. and I think thats what their goal is, to be the main heart and soul of the sport
 
if you do snowboard buy never summer, lib-tech, option , gnu. Ther all companies who manufacture their snowboards in the us or Canada and they run 200 dollars less than Burton.

 
its a little different, burton is like the company that started it all, so they have been there the whole time growing over all these years and seeing as they were original they have had the market pretty much cornered since the beginning. back then it didnt seem like such a monopoly because it was snowboarding, rebelling against the traditional skiers so it seemed and probably was more real and part of the culture, now it has grown into something else. now that snowboarding has been popularized and is now "cool" to every pop music loving kid who bought the new t-pain/chris brown cd, burton cant feed solely off the fact that snowboarding is cool in a rebellious sense. it was a small rebel but now they themseleves have become the dictator of snowboarding

if you follow.

basically, snowboarding isnt a rebellion anymore so it lost that sense of cool

now its "cool" in the eyes of pop culture

so burton doesnt seem as down/real as it was when it was fighting to get snowboarding accepted

 
somebody should post this on the burton forums remember how pissed they got when the jiberish breck edit was put on their site, it was hilarious!!!
 
im not too sure about that the only link between them is gnu bought a rossignol factory in Spain to make the street series at a cheaper price
 
i respectfully disagree.

-burton telling kids to poach the 4 resorts was very immature

-you said that our skiing is different then the old type of skiing, thats incorrect. although there werent parks people built jumps and did tricks back then too

-you said

but on what i was saying about messengers post, all the original ski companies are already huge really and i dont think any other companies will be able to achieve anything past that, line was the biggest of the underground companies and thats as big as an upstart company got and they pioneered the twintip movement
 
OK, so just because burton is big it shouldnt be aloud to have this contest but if they were a small starting company it would be ok?? thats retarded. the idea stays the same, it doesnt matter where it comes from. I thought it was a lame article that just found a way of dissing a snowboard company by taking way to seriously same of the words that they choose to describe their contest. I think burton is right and its pretty lame that some resorts still choose to not allow snowboarders. I went to utah n just because one of my friends snowboarded we couldnt go to the legendary alta resort how fucking dumb is that?

The only reason Burton should be dissed on is because their trying to prove that snowboarding equal to skiing with this contest while dropping all skiers that were an RED and Anon. Now that is fucking lame
 
i cant wait to see what he has to say to retaliate, theres really nothing you can say unless he pulls a "oh yeah....well....your gay"
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top