onenerdykid
Active member
14570793:PartyBullshiit said:You keep saying this and it may be true for your foot but it is not true across the board. The boa was for a fact harder for me to step into than the buckle version side by side. Foot shape will have a lot to do with this.
secondly I am not the only person to have this reaction. Here’s a direct quote from a reviewer. They’ve not been the only one to mention harder entry.
“Additionally, since the BOA cable doesn’t completely open like the buckles do, there’s a touch more resistance from an entry perspective. For skiers that have had a difficult time getting boots on in the past, this is something to consider. I didn’t find it to be a deal-breaker in the least, but it is noticeable.”
others mileage may vary but to say across the board they are not harder to get into is just not true.
https://www.skiessentials.com/Chairlift-Chat/2024-salomon-s-pro-supra-120-boa-ski-boot-review
What boots were you comparing side by side? The same exact boot but one with buckles and one with BOA? As far as I am aware, only Atomic and Fischer are using the same mold for both closure systems. Salomon isn't and I believe the buckle versions of the K2 are also a different mold series- Tom let me know if that's not the case.
That reviewer of the Salomon S/Pro Supra BOA boot can't say that the Supra is harder to put on due to the BOA system because they don't have the same boot with buckles to run the comparison against. It doesn't exist. The S/Pro Supra BOA might actually be harder to put on vs. the previous generation S/Pro with buckles or other boots in its category, but it's not an apples to apples comparison. Different mold geometries and different plastic thicknesses are at play, not just a difference in closure systems.
Now, can a brand spec the wrong cable length and cause some issues regarding step-in? Yes, absolutely possible. But if there is ample cable in the system, it shouldn't be getting in the way of anything. But this would be a spec issue, not one related to the BOA system itself being the culprit.
To make things even more murky, every ski boot brand will face plastic hardness tolerances from the plastic manufacturers. You can easily get a boot that is between 7-10% stiffer or softer from batch to batch in the same model of boot. The harder the plastic, the more difficult the step-in.
All I'm saying is that there lots of variables at play when comparing the step-in of one boot to another. You need to eliminate as many variables from the equation as possible to truly know what is causing what. In the case of Atomic, barring a production error or spec error, there shouldn't be a difference between the step-in of the BOA vs. the buckle version of the same boot.
**This post was edited on Dec 6th 2023 at 1:44:21pm







