ineedarealname
Active member
they are all influential and really good. gagnier is by no means way better then tanner. if you mean by working more on big spins then maybe, but tanner is still more well rounded and dont even bring up the argument about charles stomping chads on park twins because thats just one jump. t hall has really rounded himself off with park,urban,bc jumps,pipe, and i hear hes dabbling in REAL bc skiing. now im not saying gagnier is not sick, because he is really good but hall has been way mroe influential to the world of skiing and showmanship is what caused him to be so influential which isnt a bad thing at all. candide, jon, dumont and others are not even similar to each other besides the fact they are the biggest names in skiing. every single one of them are still the ones who influence everything in skiing. schiller is SICK and he might be on the same level park wise but i havent seen him bust anything crazy on urban or in the bc. im not bashing him either. just remember your roots kids, without these guys you may call 'sell outs', the level of skiing which attracts you every year to videos,comps and magazines would not be the same.
thats my two cents.
thats my two cents.