If you want to further your intellectual prowess, go to the library (or at least take community college courses). Don't spend an absurd amount of money (or possibly incur a suicidal amount of debt) just so you can get a piece of paper that validates some ambiguous semblance of intellectual worth as a thinking person, at the expense of having any practical value in society.
Sorry, but the guy majoring as an accountant without a shred of interest is smarter than the guy majoring in, say, fine arts (because it's like, his passion, man). Why? Because the accountant has invested his time and tuition into a fiscally secure future, and if he has a passion for fine arts, there's nothing stopping him from pursuing that (read: go to the fucking library). Furthermore, because he makes more money, it will also be easier for him to return to a college to take classes for the sole purpose of pursuing his interests. And since he got a degree that actually puts food on the table the first time around, he can take select classes freely without any concern for further merit (i.e. graduating a second time). And no, this isn't a two-way street. You simply cannot go to the library and learn to be an accountant/lawyer/doctor/engineer/etc.
The fine arts major spent his time and money getting certified in an inherently ambiguous field with zero practical value. I don't mean these degrees won't enrich everyday life - if you go to school without becoming civilized in the arts/sciences/language/philosophy to some basic degree, you have failed. What I'm saying is that these degrees have no financial value. You are literally taking a huge sum of money, throwing it at an institution which sells readily available information (often for free) at tremendous markup, and coming out with no boost in socioeconomic potential.
Do you see the misapplication of resources here? It's like buying a Lamborghini for the sole purpose of taking your kids to soccer practice. The car isn't any less impressive, but the context in which you bought and used it is ludicrous. Contrary to original aims of academia, college has lost its integrity; it isn't simply for getting educated anymore. The reason you pay all those bogus fees and jump through those hoops is to get that stupid piece of paper that does little more than put your name in the call-back pile (exceptions include highly specialized technical fields). If you sacrifice all that time and money for such academic overkill, you are detrimentally idealist in my opinion. Not to mention, most "safe" degrees encompass most, if not all, the communicative and philosophical aspects (among others) of their respective majors. I'm a finance major and let me tell you, I was not expecting to do this much philosophy.
Yes, there's something to be said for the Kerouacian life approach; it takes balls to pursue what you love and never let anyone fault you for that. But to downplay the inherent dangers of such an approach is grossly negligent and, like I said, painfully utopist; you simply can't make the argument that attending university for an impractical major (however life-enriching it may be) is economically viable.