13572993:cornholio said:
			
		
	
	
		
		
			12-0
#keeppounding
cam has had worse than NE quality receivers all season.  ginn jr?  funchess? ol man cotchery?  sure olsen is a cool guy, but gronk was arguably better before goodell had him axed.  jonathan stewart? is a quality solid back?  wut?   after 8 seasons he's not in a timeshare, yeah his numbers will improve.  cams getting shit done when he needs to, MVP for sure
he hardly even pouts or wears a towel on his head anymore
		
		
	 
Gronk arguably better than Olsen? Are you kidding me? There's no argument: Gronk is better than Olsen. By a lot. Tom isn't "getting shit done when he needs to?"
	
		
			
				13573025:eheath said:
			
		
	
	
		
		
			I mean your somewhat real hard on for Brady is just like every other Pat fan, just because he's the 'best' doesn't mean he'll win mvp this year.
		
		
	 
Oh I know he won't win because people are in love with what Cam's doing for some reason, but that doesn't mean those people are right. The popular choice isn't always the best choice.
And to actually respond to what you said in your comparison of the two:
1. There's a reason NE relies much more heavily on the passing game than the run game. When you have one of the greatest quarterbacks ever on your team, you let him throw the ball as much as possible.
2. To negate the 1000 yards Tom has over Newton because he throws the ball more is silly. He throws the ball more because, well, he's much better than Cam at throwing it. You also say it doesn't count because he dumps it to his running backs much of the time. If it was so easy to gain massive amounts of passing yards just by dumping it to your rb, why doesn't every team and qb in the league do it? Why isn't Cam gaining just as many yards by dumping it to his rbs as Brady if it's so easy? Again, there's a reason Brady has had so many passing attempts this season, and there's a reason the Pats didn't spend money to sign a big name RB, and both of those reasons are that with Brady as quarterback it'd be silly to take up cap room on a stud RB when you have one of the best of all time under center.
3. You also don't account for the fact that Tom has thrown fewer interceptions than Cam while attempting over 125 more passes. This shouldn't count for nothing.
I'm not saying Cam hasn't been great, because he has been, clearly, but to say that Brady, who is on pace for one of the best statistical seasons in the history of the NFL, doesn't deserve the MVP award over a qb with middle of the pack passing stats whose greatest assets are his size and athleticism and is on an undefeated team riding its defense seems absurd to me.
Far less absurd than saying New England with Cam is a better team than New England with Tom (looking at you, BakerPow), but absurd nonetheless.