marijuana Member Nov 26, 2005 #1 Seriously, is there that big of a difference between these sizes? I'm 5'11", about 160 lbs.
Q quattro179 Member Nov 26, 2005 #5 Probably like the length of your finger. I was in this position on gotamas and i went 176 cuz thy are pretty beefy.
Probably like the length of your finger. I was in this position on gotamas and i went 176 cuz thy are pretty beefy.
marijuana Member Nov 26, 2005 #6 I'm thinkin 183 b/c they're meant for big mountain, so the longer size should be a bit more stable. And isn't the actual running length a little shorter b/c of the tips?
I'm thinkin 183 b/c they're meant for big mountain, so the longer size should be a bit more stable. And isn't the actual running length a little shorter b/c of the tips?
J Jaskittin Active member Nov 26, 2005 #7 I have some 183 STL's and thats a big step up from my 171 Mad Trix. There is a definent difference. I really like the longer ski, more control, better stability.
I have some 183 STL's and thats a big step up from my 171 Mad Trix. There is a definent difference. I really like the longer ski, more control, better stability.
Lineskier-101 Active member Nov 26, 2005 #8 I skied 179 for the first time last night, and I was coming from 165's, there was a huge difference, but it only took a few runs to smooth out.
I skied 179 for the first time last night, and I was coming from 165's, there was a huge difference, but it only took a few runs to smooth out.
marijuana Member Nov 26, 2005 #9 Yea, I'm currently riding on some 168's. So uh, I think I'll be pleased.
Kev Active member Staff member Nov 26, 2005 #13 i would go 183 gotma if i where you. Mount them a tad forward.
marijuana Member Nov 26, 2005 #14 Oh man. That is such good advice. Why didn't I think of that before. Thanks.