11 Charged with Sedition Against the U.S.

14380360:r00kie said:
And you're making the chicken or egg arguement. Which came first? Let a pull out some video evidence with context to support which one ever one fits are narrative! Ridiculous that people just can't acknowledge that political violence is an issue for the extremes of each end. Political tribalism sucks.

Here we go again with false equivalence. It's not about political tribalism. I'm on the left and totally condemn all of those riots. I just recognize that violence committed or spurred on by people in power, like the cops or Trump, is worse than violence committed by ordinary people.
 
14380275:DANETRON said:
Miss ya bro and hope all is well.

Not even sure why I bothered to log in here after all these years lol. Critical thinking seems to be a real rarity here.

Miss you too man
 
14379784:Craw_Daddy said:
HoLY sHiT bRo I aM cALm.

You're the one conflating some idiots breaking in to the Capitol with a LiTtErAL cOuP pLaNnEd bY tHe rIgHt aNd tHeIR mAstEr tRuMp. I think you and other liberals are the ones that need to calm down. Or you can continue making mountains out of mole hills and I'll just keep laughing at you.

How would you feel if 5th column Sayanim Likdunik single-loyalty Israeli nationals and neocons orchestrated a coup in the US in 2001 and blamed 9/11 on a bunch of cave-dwelling Arabs who couldn't even fly single Cessna engines yet were able to fly two passenger jets into two towers destroying four in the process (even though ACAR data proves without any shread of doubt that UA175 was flying over PA and UA93 over Illinois westward well after their alleged crash times), netting Likudnik Larry Silverstein, who happened to miss work at the top of the towers that day, as did his daughter and son, billions in an insurance payout, on a purchase (wtc complex) just months before which was considered one of the worst in US history where billions of dollars in asbestos removal would have to be mended, just coincidently was destroyed and insured for total destruction because of big bad "muslims." Netanyahu said 9/11 was good for Israel and so didn't Trump.

Unfortunately your pedo Trump supports these likudniks dearly and often called Lucky Larry to talk about how Israel is the last "democracy" in the middleeast. It's okay though, fight over a stupid Fedop and not the actual coup that killed 3,000 people and hundreds of thousands in South west Asia for Israel's Balkanization agendas.

It's better the perps remain free and teach your children ethics at university.

See: https:bollyn.com, ae911truth, pilotsfor911trurh, RichardGage911, etc.

Of course, it's far easier to believe a lie than to admit you've been lied to. 9/11 was the gayest false flag coup in recorded history, and I mean happy jubilant Israelis celebrated the event and then admited they were there to document the event before fleeing back to Israel.

But the Jan 6 "coup" was worse by a long shot.
 
14380360:r00kie said:
And you're making the chicken or egg arguement. Which came first? Let a pull out some video evidence with context to support which one ever one fits are narrative! Ridiculous that people just can't acknowledge that political violence is an issue for the extremes of each end. Political tribalism sucks.

How could it possibly be a chicken-egg argument when the argument I was making was that they are completely different and not at all equatable nor connected?

Simply put, what happened at the Capitol and what happened during the BLM protests have gulf of differences between them.. many many degrees of separation, not to say the least of which was the effect of the police on the situation and the politicization of either. If you want to chicken-egg it, then BLM was one of the things that eventually lead to the Capitol insurrection due to conservative media politicization of everything their voters deem scary - not due to equal competing political tactics from either side. That's the closest connection you can make between the two.

BLM is not exactly what I'd call political. It was largely targeted towards police violence against people of colour.. Many people of both parties and of all ethnic backgrounds kinda hate the cops. They're authoritarian jerks. The only people who seriously like them are narcs or those who are related to them. However the demographics of right wing conservatives in America very much don't align with the plight of African American communities. Particularly those that exist within cities, far away from the conservative voting base in rural areas and non-diversified suburban fringes. Sure, some democrats attached themselves to the whole thing - often in incredibly cringeworthy fashion - but ultimately, the Democratic party as a whole didn't take on a lot of the demands of BLM at all, or even offer any real support for them.

You didn't see high profile democrats seriously calling for defunding the police, or a restructuring of the economy or property with some sort of massive investment in the well being of people of colour. It was at best, pretty damn hollow support. The DNC were and still are far more focused on Healthcare/Covid, Infrastructure, jobs, economy, etc... with the list of social policies being very much secondary - which is partially why they haven't even come up for a vote yet. Democrats span too broad of a coalition - making it generally spineless and lackluster when it comes to nationwide social policy stuff.

Conservatives can rally around single issue voters (guns, god, taxes, scary brown people) and the Democrats just can't do the same in most circumstances - fully latching onto BLM was never going to work for the Democrats, and they really didn't. The best they can do is rally voters around improving healthcare (and wouldn't you know it, the only major thing they've really been able to do since the Clinton Administration has been healthcare-based)

Shit, dude the Democrats are such wimps... most of them ran far away from same-sex marriage for YEARS before the supreme court ruled on Obergefell v Hodges... it was only after that ruling that most of them gave it the thumbs up in support. If Roe v. Wade had never happened, I guarantee they'd have been running away from the abortion conversation this whole time. The Democrats are spineless idiots who simply don't know when to politicize things, much less have the ability to do it broadly like the GOP has been able to do.

So yeah, It was natural that the BLM protests would be politicized by the GOP to bolster support. The M/O of the GOP and conservative media is to often paint a picture to rural white uneducated voters that cities and states with Democrat Leadership are hellholes of riots, wanton destruction, drugs, homelessness, unemployment, bread lines, and whatever other dystopian element you could attach, and that if they don't vote GOP, then their small podunk ass town will absolutely get invaded by the same scary scenes.

That's how they operate. It's all fear-based and has been for years. Many former GOP operatives have admitted as much. Rush Limbaugh was screaming about the hellscapes of New York, LA, and Chicago years before Fox News even existed, all while, if anything, the inner cities of most American metros have improved tremendously since then (yes - they have), often in part to extremely popular social policies of progressive politicians who have increasingly gained power in the major cities.

The Capitol Insurrection was a political event from the start and egged-on by fear-driven rhetoric from conservative politicians themselves, so there's no question about the political nature of that event, but BLM didn't become political until the right wing used it as another scare tactic.
 
14380590:DingoSean said:
How could it possibly be a chicken-egg argument when the argument I was making was that they are completely different and not at all equatable nor connected?

Simply put, what happened at the Capitol and what happened during the BLM protests have gulf of differences between them.. many many degrees of separation, not to say the least of which was the effect of the police on the situation and the politicization of either. If you want to chicken-egg it, then BLM was one of the things that eventually lead to the Capitol insurrection due to conservative media politicization of everything their voters deem scary - not due to equal competing political tactics from either side. That's the closest connection you can make between the two.

BLM is not exactly what I'd call political. It was largely targeted towards police violence against people of colour.. Many people of both parties and of all ethnic backgrounds kinda hate the cops. They're authoritarian jerks. The only people who seriously like them are narcs or those who are related to them. However the demographics of right wing conservatives in America very much don't align with the plight of African American communities. Particularly those that exist within cities, far away from the conservative voting base in rural areas and non-diversified suburban fringes. Sure, some democrats attached themselves to the whole thing - often in incredibly cringeworthy fashion - but ultimately, the Democratic party as a whole didn't take on a lot of the demands of BLM at all, or even offer any real support for them.

You didn't see high profile democrats seriously calling for defunding the police, or a restructuring of the economy or property with some sort of massive investment in the well being of people of colour. It was at best, pretty damn hollow support. The DNC were and still are far more focused on Healthcare/Covid, Infrastructure, jobs, economy, etc... with the list of social policies being very much secondary - which is partially why they haven't even come up for a vote yet. Democrats span too broad of a coalition - making it generally spineless and lackluster when it comes to nationwide social policy stuff.

Conservatives can rally around single issue voters (guns, god, taxes, scary brown people) and the Democrats just can't do the same in most circumstances - fully latching onto BLM was never going to work for the Democrats, and they really didn't. The best they can do is rally voters around improving healthcare (and wouldn't you know it, the only major thing they've really been able to do since the Clinton Administration has been healthcare-based)

Shit, dude the Democrats are such wimps... most of them ran far away from same-sex marriage for YEARS before the supreme court ruled on Obergefell v Hodges... it was only after that ruling that most of them gave it the thumbs up in support. If Roe v. Wade had never happened, I guarantee they'd have been running away from the abortion conversation this whole time. The Democrats are spineless idiots who simply don't know when to politicize things, much less have the ability to do it broadly like the GOP has been able to do.

So yeah, It was natural that the BLM protests would be politicized by the GOP to bolster support. The M/O of the GOP and conservative media is to often paint a picture to rural white uneducated voters that cities and states with Democrat Leadership are hellholes of riots, wanton destruction, drugs, homelessness, unemployment, bread lines, and whatever other dystopian element you could attach, and that if they don't vote GOP, then their small podunk ass town will absolutely get invaded by the same scary scenes.

That's how they operate. It's all fear-based and has been for years. Many former GOP operatives have admitted as much. Rush Limbaugh was screaming about the hellscapes of New York, LA, and Chicago years before Fox News even existed, all while, if anything, the inner cities of most American metros have improved tremendously since then (yes - they have), often in part to extremely popular social policies of progressive politicians who have increasingly gained power in the major cities.

The Capitol Insurrection was a political event from the start and egged-on by fear-driven rhetoric from conservative politicians themselves, so there's no question about the political nature of that event, but BLM didn't become political until the right wing used it as another scare tactic.

I'm just gonna thumbs down this and lwt you think you won on here. I don't have time to write out essays trying to excuse one form of political violence over another.
 
14380590:DingoSean said:
How could it possibly be a chicken-egg argument when the argument I was making was that they are completely different and not at all equatable nor connected?

Simply put, what happened at the Capitol and what happened during the BLM protests have gulf of differences between them.. many many degrees of separation, not to say the least of which was the effect of the police on the situation and the politicization of either. If you want to chicken-egg it, then BLM was one of the things that eventually lead to the Capitol insurrection due to conservative media politicization of everything their voters deem scary - not due to equal competing political tactics from either side. That's the closest connection you can make between the two.

BLM is not exactly what I'd call political. It was largely targeted towards police violence against people of colour.. Many people of both parties and of all ethnic backgrounds kinda hate the cops. They're authoritarian jerks. The only people who seriously like them are narcs or those who are related to them. However the demographics of right wing conservatives in America very much don't align with the plight of African American communities. Particularly those that exist within cities, far away from the conservative voting base in rural areas and non-diversified suburban fringes. Sure, some democrats attached themselves to the whole thing - often in incredibly cringeworthy fashion - but ultimately, the Democratic party as a whole didn't take on a lot of the demands of BLM at all, or even offer any real support for them.

You didn't see high profile democrats seriously calling for defunding the police, or a restructuring of the economy or property with some sort of massive investment in the well being of people of colour. It was at best, pretty damn hollow support. The DNC were and still are far more focused on Healthcare/Covid, Infrastructure, jobs, economy, etc... with the list of social policies being very much secondary - which is partially why they haven't even come up for a vote yet. Democrats span too broad of a coalition - making it generally spineless and lackluster when it comes to nationwide social policy stuff.

Conservatives can rally around single issue voters (guns, god, taxes, scary brown people) and the Democrats just can't do the same in most circumstances - fully latching onto BLM was never going to work for the Democrats, and they really didn't. The best they can do is rally voters around improving healthcare (and wouldn't you know it, the only major thing they've really been able to do since the Clinton Administration has been healthcare-based)

Shit, dude the Democrats are such wimps... most of them ran far away from same-sex marriage for YEARS before the supreme court ruled on Obergefell v Hodges... it was only after that ruling that most of them gave it the thumbs up in support. If Roe v. Wade had never happened, I guarantee they'd have been running away from the abortion conversation this whole time. The Democrats are spineless idiots who simply don't know when to politicize things, much less have the ability to do it broadly like the GOP has been able to do.

So yeah, It was natural that the BLM protests would be politicized by the GOP to bolster support. The M/O of the GOP and conservative media is to often paint a picture to rural white uneducated voters that cities and states with Democrat Leadership are hellholes of riots, wanton destruction, drugs, homelessness, unemployment, bread lines, and whatever other dystopian element you could attach, and that if they don't vote GOP, then their small podunk ass town will absolutely get invaded by the same scary scenes.

That's how they operate. It's all fear-based and has been for years. Many former GOP operatives have admitted as much. Rush Limbaugh was screaming about the hellscapes of New York, LA, and Chicago years before Fox News even existed, all while, if anything, the inner cities of most American metros have improved tremendously since then (yes - they have), often in part to extremely popular social policies of progressive politicians who have increasingly gained power in the major cities.

The Capitol Insurrection was a political event from the start and egged-on by fear-driven rhetoric from conservative politicians themselves, so there's no question about the political nature of that event, but BLM didn't become political until the right wing used it as another scare tactic.

You sound like that one liberal who lives on a farm(no offense towards liberals) but did you actually drive through any of the cities during the riots? It was a hellhole. Capital hill in Denver and civic center park we’re turned into shit. There were protestors blocking traffic(because that works….not) and I saw a man bleeding all over his head, his car was jacked by rioters and medics were running everywhere asking people if they were ok and needed help. It’s one of those moments you duck down and hide while driving until you’re out of the clear and this was in fucking Denver of all places. I thought for a second, I had landed in the south side(great societies act) of Chicago or Detroit. Shit was fucked up.
 
14380753:SmokedGouda said:
You sound like that one liberal who lives on a farm(no offense towards liberals) but did you actually drive through any of the cities during the riots? It was a hellhole. Capital hill in Denver and civic center park we’re turned into shit. There were protestors blocking traffic(because that works….not) and I saw a man bleeding all over his head, his car was jacked by rioters and medics were running everywhere asking people if they were ok and needed help. It’s one of those moments you duck down and hide while driving until you’re out of the clear and this was in fucking Denver of all places. I thought for a second, I had landed in the south side(great societies act) of Chicago or Detroit. Shit was fucked up.

LOL you sound like the one republican who lives in a city. That sounds like a chill weekend, bro.
 
14380598:r00kie said:
I'm just gonna thumbs down this and lwt you think you won on here. I don't have time to write out essays trying to excuse one form of political violence over another.

Nowhere in that did I excuse one form of violence over another.
 
14380753:SmokedGouda said:
You sound like that one liberal who lives on a farm(no offense towards liberals) but did you actually drive through any of the cities during the riots? It was a hellhole. Capital hill in Denver and civic center park we’re turned into shit. There were protestors blocking traffic(because that works….not) and I saw a man bleeding all over his head, his car was jacked by rioters and medics were running everywhere asking people if they were ok and needed help. It’s one of those moments you duck down and hide while driving until you’re out of the clear and this was in fucking Denver of all places. I thought for a second, I had landed in the south side(great societies act) of Chicago or Detroit. Shit was fucked up.

Lol I can see you've never been to a real protest before this summer. Did you even go to university dude? Cmon man every school has at least one protest every year or 2 that gets out of hand. Perhaps not with outright violence, but certainly with police intervention and over reaction.

It's safe to say that a lot of the violence was exacerbated by police intervention in these cases... I'm not saying any of the violence that happened during the BLM protests last summer was good or condonable - literally nobody but the most idiotic people would say that - but the fact of the matter is, the protests usually started out peacefully and grew violent through the day as either the police got more involved and started beating on people, or the 'burn this motherfucker to the ground' folks started causing shit - which would only exacerbate the cops more - to where the cops would just target anyone and everything that crossed their path. It was a vicious cycle and a lot of peaceful people got caught in the middle.

You could probably say the same about the capitol insurrection. Many if not most of the people there were not trying to break into the capitol to shit on AOC's desk, however, there were organized groups amongst all of that with far worse and more violent targets... and their actions magnetized other radical people into doing some real fucked up shit that day. Politicians egging them on with blatant lies in order to stop the electoral process that was happening is just one example of that.
 
14380753:SmokedGouda said:
You sound like that one liberal who lives on a farm(no offense towards liberals) but did you actually drive through any of the cities during the riots? It was a hellhole. Capital hill in Denver and civic center park we’re turned into shit. There were protestors blocking traffic(because that works….not) and I saw a man bleeding all over his head, his car was jacked by rioters and medics were running everywhere asking people if they were ok and needed help. It’s one of those moments you duck down and hide while driving until you’re out of the clear and this was in fucking Denver of all places. I thought for a second, I had landed in the south side(great societies act) of Chicago or Detroit. Shit was fucked up.

Lol I can see you've never been to a real protest before this summer. Did you even go to university dude? Cmon man every school has at least one protest every year or 2 that gets out of hand. Perhaps not with outright violence, but certainly with police intervention and over reaction.

It's safe to say that a lot of the violence was exacerbated by police intervention in these cases... I'm not saying any of the violence that happened during the BLM protests last summer was good or condonable - literally nobody but the most idiotic people would say that - but the fact of the matter is, the protests usually started out peacefully and grew violent through the day as either the police got more involved and started beating on people, or the 'burn this motherfucker to the ground' folks started causing shit - which would only exacerbate the cops more - to where the cops would just target anyone and everything that crossed their path. It was a vicious cycle and a lot of peaceful people got caught in the middle.

You could probably say the same about the capitol insurrection. Many if not most of the people there were not trying to break into the capitol to shit on AOC's desk, however, there were organized groups amongst all of that with far worse and more violent targets... and their actions magnetized other radical people into doing some real fucked up shit that day. Politicians egging them on with blatant lies in order to stop the electoral process that was happening is just one example of that.
 
14380278:DANETRON said:
I don’t think know you really believe that but if you do you probably should take some shrooms or whatever people do these days and chill out with all the “sides” and “who is right” stuff and just focus on being a good person in this life.

My guy what
 
14380329:Jems said:
LETS DEFUND THE MPLS POLICE DEPARTMENT NOTHING COULD GO WRONG WITH IT JUST LIKE OUTRIGHT BANNING GUNS LETS BAN EVERYTHING WE DONT LIKE OUTRIGHT BECAUSE THATS HOW IT WORKS RIGHT

so unbelievably clown that politicians in minneapolis gave into the pressure. can’t fucking stand them.

They literally gave more money to the cops this year. Go check, they voted to defund then pulled the ole switcheroo in like a month
 
14381130:WuTangShinBang said:
holy shit this thread makes me glad to be canadian

We wrote the greatest constitution the world has ever seen and then substituted civic education with for profit propaganda to the point that democracy became secondary to selling ads on social media
 
14381150:Casey said:
We wrote the greatest constitution the world has ever seen and then substituted civic education with for profit propaganda to the point that democracy became secondary to selling ads on social media

i’m not trying to act like i know anything about politics haha. just sounds like some crazy shit is goin on down south
 
14379823:Lonely said:
I agree they don't represent the entire party, but just because they don't represent the entire party does not mean that a group of individuals, whether it was 5% of the people at the capital or 100% of the people at the capital, attempted to subvert an election.

I follow what the FBI says, which is that most people there were dumbasses and 5% or so were there to actually attempt to prevent an election from being certified and potentially hurt/kill government officials.

I also find it interesting that the example that you give is "scary Viking man" and not the individuals bear macing cops, beating cops, the majority of the crowd shouting to hang the vice president, confederate flags being flown, and the first people to enter the building shouting "let's get in there and get them to hunt them down one by one".

The argument of "well they didn't actually succeed in subverting the election, so it's fine just do it a different day" doesn't hold much water. If you try to commit a crime, and don't succeed, it's still a crime.

What if in the future, instead of it being one day, it's a week, or a month. This whole thing of "the capital got taken over just do it tommorow" about one of the oldest traditions in this country seems kinda silly to me.

2022 and 2024 will be interesting for sure.

The WSJ did an excellent video analysis on it and it looks like a subset of Proud Boys were the main instigators of the event:
=495s

Im conservative and am willing to spit in the face of every fucking idiot that walked into the Capitol that day. The irony is they gave the Liberals the greatest gift anyone could give and handed over the narrative after months of riots by the Left. Kamala is still a dumbass for comparing it to 911 and Pearl Harbor though. She sure overplayed her hand on that one in a stupid way.
 
14380190:Italian.Stallion said:
Only one side was brainwashed into believing a lie, the lie that the election was stolen. This lie was spread by the leader of their party, the current president at the time, in an attempt to undermine our country's basic principles for his own self interest. Though both sets of pictures show violence, they incomparable in basically every other way.

I disagree. The Liberals and the media covered up and lied for months about how bad the riots were and how many peoples lives were fucked up. They set up a Marxist autonomous zone in Seattle which is literal sedition and the Mayor called it the "Summer of Love" until innocent people got killed. Ted Wheeler refused National Guard in Portland for weeks of riots when they were trying to burn down the police station and had the Federal Courthouse under siege.
 
14381172:SuspiciousFish said:
I disagree. The Liberals and the media covered up and lied for months about how bad the riots were and how many peoples lives were fucked up. They set up a Marxist autonomous zone in Seattle which is literal sedition and the Mayor called it the "Summer of Love" until innocent people got killed. Ted Wheeler refused National Guard in Portland for weeks of riots when they were trying to burn down the police station and had the Federal Courthouse under siege.

You're conflating poor governance (which is also somewhat debatable, given how the feds were acting and general distrust of the federal government due to Trump being a fucktard for four years) with Trump's deliberate attempt to fuck up the peaceful transfer of power for his own gain. Plus you're literally comparing the mayors of two cities to the POTUS, who is clearly in a much more powerful position. It's not hard to see that setting up an autonomous zone in Seattle is way less serious than Trump's direct attack on the presidential election. The attempt by the conservative media to equate the two things is laughable. It's too bad right-wingers like you eat it up every time.
 
14381172:SuspiciousFish said:
I disagree. The Liberals and the media covered up and lied for months about how bad the riots were and how many peoples lives were fucked up. They set up a Marxist autonomous zone in Seattle which is literal sedition and the Mayor called it the "Summer of Love" until innocent people got killed. Ted Wheeler refused National Guard in Portland for weeks of riots when they were trying to burn down the police station and had the Federal Courthouse under siege.

You don’t live in Seattle. Shit TF up about what happened because you have no fucking clue.
 
14381202:Casey said:
Yep and we’re all getting filthy fucking rich out here it sucks. ?

dude thinks he's up because he lives in Seattle ? just cuz u can shit in the street without repercussions doesn't make it a good place to live ?
 
fucking kill yourself skierman

lets just all give up our right to bear arms and be cucklords trying to suck our own dicks while in lockdown like the australians

yeah that sounds about right.
 
14381170:SuspiciousFish said:
Kamala is still a dumbass for comparing it to 911 and Pearl Harbor though. She sure overplayed her hand on that one in a stupid way.

Yeah, it wasn`t pearl harbor or 9/11 by any stretch... that was overstating the situation for sure.

It was at the absolute very worst, a wanna-be Ft. Sumter... Of course it was a really shitty thing that happened and we need to remember it as a stain on the national history, and something nobody ever wants to see again...

...but comparing it to a foreign attack where thousands died? That's giving it far too much credit, and lessens the gravity of those events. Not a good look.
 
14381874:ChadThundercock said:
fucking kill yourself skierman

lets just all give up our right to bear arms and be cucklords trying to suck our own dicks while in lockdown like the australians

yeah that sounds about right.

LOL Trump has never handled a firearm in his life. You Trumpers are so fucking retarded.
 
You're the reason I support abortion.

topic:skierman said:
https://www.ksl.com/article/50327787/11-oath-keepers-first-to-be-charged-with-seditious-conspiracy-in-capitol-attack

"IT WAS JUST AN UNARMED PROTEST! IT WAS PEACEFUL! IF IT WAS SEDITION HOW COMES NO ONE HAS BEEN CHARGED WITH IT!?" - every dumb fuck Trump supporter

Well there you have it. You stupid fucks were convinced to overthrow your own government for a diabetes ridden reality TV show host. That's just embarrassing.
 
14381995:DingoSean said:
I mean...

View attachment 1027583

Technically that's handling a firearm lol

Yeah, that's like taking this picture and saying he's technically driven a semi.

2622.jpg


**This post was edited on Jan 19th 2022 at 11:01:26am
 
14381884:DingoSean said:
Yeah, it wasn`t pearl harbor or 9/11 by any stretch... that was overstating the situation for sure.

It was at the absolute very worst, a wanna-be Ft. Sumter... Of course it was a really shitty thing that happened and we need to remember it as a stain on the national history, and something nobody ever wants to see again...

...but comparing it to a foreign attack where thousands died? That's giving it far too much credit, and lessens the gravity of those events. Not a good look.

Thats the funny thing about it. For the people at the forefront who had the intention of actually storming congress. What was their plan really? They were unarmed and even if they did get into the inner chambers without getting shot, the SWAT teams would have been there in min to nail everyone. In fact, it did the opposite of what they would have wanted. A number of congressmen were going to present evidence on election fraud and inconsistencies at that session but they all kept quiet after the building got stormed. Thats why its so stupid and a giant LARP fest and tantrum.
 
14382012:SuspiciousFish said:
Thats the funny thing about it. For the people at the forefront who had the intention of actually storming congress. What was their plan really? They were unarmed and even if they did get into the inner chambers without getting shot, the SWAT teams would have been there in min to nail everyone. In fact, it did the opposite of what they would have wanted. A number of congressmen were going to present evidence on election fraud and inconsistencies at that session but they all kept quiet after the building got stormed. Thats why its so stupid and a giant LARP fest and tantrum.

Yeah man, I'm sure they were just kidding with their bear spray, zip tie handcuffs, beating officers, smashing doors and windows and roaming the halls trying to find our elective reps. while screaming they want to kill our Vice President and stop the certification of the election.
 
14382012:SuspiciousFish said:
Thats the funny thing about it. For the people at the forefront who had the intention of actually storming congress. What was their plan really? They were unarmed and even if they did get into the inner chambers without getting shot, the SWAT teams would have been there in min to nail everyone. In fact, it did the opposite of what they would have wanted. A number of congressmen were going to present evidence on election fraud and inconsistencies at that session but they all kept quiet after the building got stormed. Thats why its so stupid and a giant LARP fest and tantrum.

Lol, they definitely were not going to present any real evidence on election fraud either way so that point is moot af.

In any case... yeah it took fucking forever for any real police presence to arrive... a lot of questions to still be asked as to why that was the case...
 
14382012:SuspiciousFish said:
Thats the funny thing about it. For the people at the forefront who had the intention of actually storming congress. What was their plan really? They were unarmed and even if they did get into the inner chambers without getting shot, the SWAT teams would have been there in min to nail everyone. In fact, it did the opposite of what they would have wanted. A number of congressmen were going to present evidence on election fraud and inconsistencies at that session but they all kept quiet after the building got stormed. Thats why its so stupid and a giant LARP fest and tantrum.

When is the last time anyone that was larping invaded a building using weapons and attacking police in order to reach people they intended to harm?
 
How many people were killed on January 6th again?

How many FBI agents were there as agitators to encourage chaos and destruction?

Who is Ray Epps?

How many weapons were confiscated from protestors?

Why were the police allowing people through the barricades?

Why are the January 6th protestors somehow "terrorists", but BLM and Antifa, who caused millions of dollars in damage to cities and injured thousands of police officers across America during the summer of 2020, are somehow heroes that deserve to be bailed out by the least popular Vice President in American history, Kamala Harris?
 
14382134:ghanley said:
How many people were killed on January 6th again?

How many FBI agents were there as agitators to encourage chaos and destruction?

Who is Ray Epps?

How many weapons were confiscated from protestors?

Why were the police allowing people through the barricades?

Why are the January 6th protestors somehow "terrorists", but BLM and Antifa, who caused millions of dollars in damage to cities and injured thousands of police officers across America during the summer of 2020, are somehow heroes that deserve to be bailed out by the least popular Vice President in American history, Kamala Harris?

Lets not use common sense.. liberals hate that shit.
 
14380302:SmokedGouda said:
Don’t get rid of the filibuster!! Just my two cents. All politicians can go fuck themselves. Just had to offer something even if it meant literally nothing to the thread. Both sides need to admit they have some stuff wrong with each of em.

I don't think they should necessarily get rid of the filibuster but I think one of those fuckers should have to get up there and talk for however long like they did in the good ole days instead of just voting on it.
 
14382134:ghanley said:
How many people were killed on January 6th again?

How many FBI agents were there as agitators to encourage chaos and destruction?

Who is Ray Epps?

How many weapons were confiscated from protestors?

Why were the police allowing people through the barricades?

Why are the January 6th protestors somehow "terrorists", but BLM and Antifa, who caused millions of dollars in damage to cities and injured thousands of police officers across America during the summer of 2020, are somehow heroes that deserve to be bailed out by the least popular Vice President in American history, Kamala Harris?

1. 5 deaths. 5 More than the aforementioned Ft. Sumter and 5 more than there ever should have been.

2. I don't know but probably none because that's definitely not the FBI's job.

3. Good question. Who the fuck is that? (tbf I haven't been following whatever is being talked about on cable news lol)

4. Most of the people who were attacking the capitol left afterwards and were not apprehended if I'm not mistaken.

5. Because they were either overwhelmed or they were co-conspirators? Admittedly a good question to ask... wtf was that about? There's absolutely no way they should have been letting people just walk on through.

6. Whattaboutism gonna whattabout. I don't think anyone is praising anyone who commits wanton destruction of property as a hero.. Absolutely everyone from protesters to political leaders were telling people to stay peaceful and not break shit.

But also lol... least popular in American history? No. Not even close. You're reading too much conservative bubble media, my friend. (here are some receipts for ya: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/08/03/is-kamala-harris-really-most-unpopular-vice-president-modern-history/)
 
14382317:DingoSean said:
1. 5 deaths. 5 More than the aforementioned Ft. Sumter and 5 more than there ever should have been.

2. I don't know but probably none because that's definitely not the FBI's job.

3. Good question. Who the fuck is that? (tbf I haven't been following whatever is being talked about on cable news lol)

4. Most of the people who were attacking the capitol left afterwards and were not apprehended if I'm not mistaken.

5. Because they were either overwhelmed or they were co-conspirators? Admittedly a good question to ask... wtf was that about? There's absolutely no way they should have been letting people just walk on through.

6. Whattaboutism gonna whattabout. I don't think anyone is praising anyone who commits wanton destruction of property as a hero.. Absolutely everyone from protesters to political leaders were telling people to stay peaceful and not break shit.

But also lol... least popular in American history? No. Not even close. You're reading too much conservative bubble media, my friend. (here are some receipts for ya: https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2021/08/03/is-kamala-harris-really-most-unpopular-vice-president-modern-history/)

1. Incorrect. Ashli Babbit was the only person that was killed on January 6th. An unarmed Air Force Veteran that was murdered by Michael Byrd, who previously left his loaded service weapon in the public restroom in the Capitol. Clearly someone that is reckless and has a history of poor judgement. There were 4 other deaths, but only 1 person was killed.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9689407/Capitol-Hill-cop-shot-dead-MAGA-rioter-Ashli-Babbitt-REVEALED.html

2. What makes you so sure of that? Should I just take your word for it? Why wouldn't the Executive Assistant Director Jill Sandborn answer Senator Ted Cruz when he asked that very question? If it were so obvious they weren't involved, why wouldn't she just say so?

https://twitter.com/ColumbiaBugle/status/1480941660401979405?s=20

3. Ray Epps is one of those suspected Feds. He was seen the night before encouraging people to go in to the capital as others were disturbed by this. He was also on the FBI's most wanted list following Jan 6th and then mysteriously taken off with no explanation and has not been arrested to anyone's knowledge.

https://twitter.com/SenTedCruz/status/1481021072367624196?s=20

4. Sooo.... Not a single gun that I am aware of. Feel free to correct me on that. Who plans a coup or insurrection without guns?

5. There is no logical explanation. There is something the public does not know as to why proper security was not in place that day. Everyone knew ahead of time there was going to be a massive crowd of people in DC on January 6th. Don't you think it would have been a good idea to bring in the National Guard, especially after we all saw what happened in the Summer of 2020 when people from out of state come to wreak havoc on a city?

That garbage WP article is from August 2021 by the way. If I am "not even close", why are Democrats already speculating who will be replacing her in 2024? Hilary Clinton (lmfao) is getting more talk about 2024 than Kamala. Everyone knows it is over for her. Kamala could not even win her own state of California in the Democrat primary. She is despised by everyone. The majority of her staff has already quit because she is such a toxic repulsive human being. You might want to update those receipts.
 
14382340:ghanley said:
1. Incorrect. Ashli Babbit was the only person that was killed on January 6th. An unarmed Air Force Veteran that was murdered by Michael Byrd, who previously left his loaded service weapon in the public restroom in the Capitol. Clearly someone that is reckless and has a history of poor judgement. There were 4 other deaths, but only 1 person was killed.

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9689407/Capitol-Hill-cop-shot-dead-MAGA-rioter-Ashli-Babbitt-REVEALED.html

2. What makes you so sure of that? Should I just take your word for it? Why wouldn't the Executive Assistant Director Jill Sandborn answer Senator Ted Cruz when he asked that very question? If it were so obvious they weren't involved, why wouldn't she just say so?

https://twitter.com/ColumbiaBugle/status/1480941660401979405?s=20

3. Ray Epps is one of those suspected Feds. He was seen the night before encouraging people to go in to the capital as others were disturbed by this. He was also on the FBI's most wanted list following Jan 6th and then mysteriously taken off with no explanation and has not been arrested to anyone's knowledge.

https://twitter.com/SenTedCruz/status/1481021072367624196?s=20

4. Sooo.... Not a single gun that I am aware of. Feel free to correct me on that. Who plans a coup or insurrection without guns?

5. There is no logical explanation. There is something the public does not know as to why proper security was not in place that day. Everyone knew ahead of time there was going to be a massive crowd of people in DC on January 6th. Don't you think it would have been a good idea to bring in the National Guard, especially after we all saw what happened in the Summer of 2020 when people from out of state come to wreak havoc on a city?

That garbage WP article is from August 2021 by the way. If I am "not even close", why are Democrats already speculating who will be replacing her in 2024? Hilary Clinton (lmfao) is getting more talk about 2024 than Kamala. Everyone knows it is over for her. Kamala could not even win her own state of California in the Democrat primary. She is despised by everyone. The majority of her staff has already quit because she is such a toxic repulsive human being. You might want to update those receipts.

1. Even if we go with your numbers, then that's 1 more than there ever should have been. Just like the 25 or so who died during all the protests all summer long should never have died. Again. Ft. Sumter had zero casualties and started a civil war.

2. You can go ahead and throw that link out because 'Columbia Bugle' is not real news.

3. Ted Cruz sucks. Even republicans hate him. https://twitter.com/TheGoodLiars/status/1483948237031620616?s=20

4. I don't think either of us can confirm who had guns or not. While it's impossible to know precisely how many firearms were brought to the Capitol on January 6, it's already clear that at least some of the people present were carrying guns that day. And as the police officers who testified at the committee made clear, rioters also used numerous other objects as weapons such as knives and batons

That said, what has been confirmed by multiple news sources on both sides of the stick, is that oath keepers had a stockpile ready to go... https://thehill.com/policy/national-security/590442-oath-keepers-stockpiled-30-days-of-supplies-rifles-ahead-of-jan-6 so saying this wasn't an armed insurrection is pretty much bullshit.

5. Its fair to say that just because there's a crowd does not mean that said crowd is going to storm the capitol. Also, Trump never ordered 10000 National Guard troops - or any NG troops for that matter, and Nancy Pelosi never rejected said non-request... So I'ma put this on the former guy on stand for this because he's who didn't order any national guard troops, and who fired up the crowd to go to the capitol... https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/factcheck/2021/12/16/fact-check-no-trump-request-10000-guard-troops-jan-6/8929215002/

6. Who cares when it was from? It's showing polling statistics and facts that are still very much valid. Polls go up and down. As for 2024, dude... there's always speculation in the press... especially when it comes to the 2024 election because we still aren't sure if Biden will even contest it... Kamala would absolutely dominate in a California primary. National numbers do not indicate how popular and strong she is in California, despite her gaffes since exiting the Senate (where she really should have stayed, honestly since she's at her best during committee hearings)

You obviously hate her guts, but your fragile ass emotional reaction to her does not make you correct.

Just take solace that the GOP is going to take control of congress next year like every non-9/11 post-presidential midterm...
 
Back
Top