XXL Oakley

*Koolaid*

*Koolaid*

Active member
Ok, those of you who have an oakley jacket in either XL or XXL, is it really that big? Ive tried on an XL oakley standard jacket, and it really wasnt that big. Of course im 6'2, but all ive heard is that Oakley fits gigantic. I mean, if your 5'6 and get xl, sure its going to be giant but what xl jacket on a 5'6 kid isnt going to be giant. What you guys think? Does oakley really fit that gigantic? I feel they kind of run a little small on some of the things ive tried on.
 
It all fits really deifferently. the puffy stuff comes up small.

Some of their park fit comes up pretty standard for XL.

Then there parker style jackets can run big.

It's pretty all over the shop, i own Oakley Small to XL in Summer and winter wear and it all fit's real nice. I'm like 6ft so you can't really predict
 
Meh, I have an XXL link jacket and it fits me fine... like not overly baggy and I'm 6'2". One thing's for sure, I'd pick the XXL over the XL, not to be gansta baggy, but in essence for functionality. Being 6'2" means having long arms; I don't think an XL would give me the coverage I'd be looking for.
 
^ let me rephrase that does anybody know if oakley sample jackets run bigger than

normal jackets
 
I went with an xxl evo jacket. Invaderskier36 definently helped me out by showing me pictures of his XXL standard jacket (a jacket i had previously tried on in xl) and he is 6' and it didnt look ridiculous on him. Does anyone know how that evo jacket will fit tho? Cuz the standard i know has a "park fit" to it.
 
im 6'1 180 and i have an xl evo jacket. Its the "baggy fit" style and it is big. real baggy and i def wouldnt want anything bigger. Unless you like ur shit real huge u might end up wanting an xl rather than xxl
 
I think you're going to get all kinds of responses, but here's my 2 cents.

I have 2 of this years oakley jackets. I have the Cohesion and the Evo lite jacket. Both are baggy fit.

I'm 5'10 and I got the medium and they are pretty damn baggy. Large would be pretty huge on me I think. I have the same setup as the one Jacob Wester is wearing at the JOI. If you haven't seen it, check out all the videos for it. It's definitely not small or even fitted in any way.

If you really like the baggy steeze than L would be fine I think. XL and XXL would be ridiculous.

 
hes 62 xl wont be redic, and if xl and xxl are same legnth def get xl, its already real wide
 
Im 6'1 and i got the evo jacket in XL and one of hte pants that come in ozone in XXL. they come tomarrow so ill tell you how they fit
 
I am 5'7"-5'8" and i had a large Axis Jacket. it was "park" fit and was baggy on me.

My evoloution suit is "baggy" fit and Large and is huge. It definitly fits baggier than my XL ripcurl suit or my XL SMS Jacket.

1194487453-546644-600x977-1194487452oakleyfite.JPG

 
sweet, that would be much appreciated, thanks. Getting kinda mixed stuff here, some say itll be fine some say way to big. Like i said im 6'2 pushing 6'3'' and i want it baggy, just not so ridiculous that it looks straight hood/wigga/gangsta hah. Thanks for the help and input guys, anything else you guys got would be appreciated.
 
im 6' and i was deciding between an XL and a L in the new evo jacket the other day.

i tried the XL... the length was fine, but it was so wide that it looked like a dress. soo i bought the L.

hate all you want, im not much of a G though. ski clothes should fit for shredding. the mountain is not a fucking fashion show.
 
perfect size on that red evo jacket I have a L baggy fit also and im 5`7 baggy but not tom walish baggy

 
Ya no doubt dude i hear ya there. Thats why im asking NS b/c i want it for its functionality. It just so happens they have xxl and thats it haha. Idk, when i talked to the oakley guy, I asked if he had any of the oakley jackets from this year and also told him i was 6'3. He said he had the In the Crevasse Jacket and said that xxl should be fine. Now it could be a sales ploy, which is most likely the case, but he sounded legit and sounded like he knew what he was talking about. He didnt even think twice about it and said it should be fine.
 
im 6' and I just got the over the top pant in large they are 'baggy fit'. For my taste I couldnt go any bigger than that. so yeah baggy fit is really baggy. There is a big difference with regular fit.
 
well its the same thing for the jacket. I dont know the name of the model that I got but anyway its baggy fit in large and its really big. I def woulnd want anything bigger than that...
 
oakley stuff isn't that big. for example, my predatorwear xxl pants are 4 inches longer than my oakley xxls, and similar width... I'm 6'1 and in my opinion for people as tall as us always buy shit as big as you can find it, it wont be too big I promise you.
 
yeah that must be true. I got sample stuff and like I said they are pretty big... but I never tried regular stuff so forget what I said previously...
 
that was the best, longest oakley jacket ever made. there need to be more long jackets for us "over 6 feet" niggas
 
The standard and cohort are kinda like that....They fit really long, you just have to make sure you get a size with the sleeves long enough =\
 
Photo24.jpg


The jacket is fucking huge on me. it fits bigger than my XXL bullet jacket i got last year and its only an XL. The pants are called the in focus pants. they are xxl and regular fit not baggy. With some sag they look pretty sick they are baggy but not baggy enough to slow you down like my 3.6 puffies did lasty ear. Sick shit for sure this year
 
update, just got some other oakley xxl pants (spray) and they fit pleasantly large possibly even larger than the predator ones... guess it varies.
 
I guess this is kinda a long shot, but does ANYONE have the evo jacket in xxl that is around 6' tall? If you do can you post a pic or something to help me out! thanks
 
Dude im 6'1 and the XL is big on me XXL would be huge n you. But yeah im 6'1 and the jacket in my pic is XL
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top