WWI info

steezbox

steezbox

Active member
Hello NS. I have an essay due on Monday about the battle of La Somme during WWI. I need to write about 3 failures and 3 victories which were achieved during that battle, and casualties for both sides - specific # for deaths, injuries, and numbers on both sides.

Not expecting anyone to know this specific info, but if anyone knows any good sites or books please tell me. No wiki by the way - I have already read the whole thing.
 
did you try looking into the sources cited at the bottom of the wiki page? Profs tend to tell you to keep away from the wiki itself, but the pages they come from are usually pretty reliable.

if not, get yourself a book asap. cant beat it.
 
1. Artillery fire was unable to destroy German defenses (barbed wire etc.)

2. Abrupt stop in artillery fire alerted germans of attack.

Those are two failures, but I am not sure if there were any other large sacle failures after the first day. And as far as victories go it was just the tanks (which were unreliable)? Seems like the whole battle was a failure for mankind, but anyways.
 
I remember it being a battle with a 1,200,000 deaths and the allies only advanced something like 25 miles. There was a huge outrage in britian and france about how many deaths there were and how very little ground was gained. In the end the battle was a battle that had almost no meaning, I don't remember why though.

That is just off the top of my head, I would hit up google if I were you.
 
You could argue that tanks were a failure at the Somme because they were deployed in pretty small numbers and were mostly unreliable. Under half of the available tanks made it into battle and the element of surprise was lost. They did help, but if the British waited to manufacture more and make them more reliable, tanks would've had a much bigger impact during the battle.
In the war overall though they were a victory.
 
Good point, they could have improved the few they built though. If the number they had available in the first place could have all been deployed they would of made a significantly larger impact.
 
also a form of mental fighting. If you've been on the front for awhile and are getting tired of fighting, and suddenly spot something you've never seen before, and your guys can't figure out how to stop it...its going to heavily demoralize you.

shock effect.
 
Definitely true, but that was one of the downfalls of the premature deployment. The shock effect was not nearly what it could have been.
 
Yeah I know they were pressured and didn't have much else to do. It's just too bad that it was rushed because it could of had devastating effects on the battle.
 
I guess any real victories were pretty non-existant for either side taking into account their gains in contrast to the number of deaths.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top