WTT: Aramada JP Vs. Juliens for ANT's

Mixamatosis

Mixamatosis

Member
I have a pair of new JP vs. Juliens mounted with Rossignol Axial 2 pro ti'2. They were skied once and have no scratces or anything.

Willing to trade for a pair of ANT's.
 
yea like axial2. just some crazy name. Really good bindings though. super solid I'd say and the skis overall are super light.
 
no, i mean, whats the 2 for? i thought there was only one version of the axial. not including the race stocks.
 
honestly, im not interested cause i dont have ANTS. i was jus wondering cause i got gold rossi axial TI's. they dont say 2 though. so i was jus wondering what im missing out on.
 
Sometimes I laugh so hard at these posts that I almost fall outta my chair. The Axial 2 is this years (2006) model right? They stopped with the rotating heal piece last year. It was just called Axial, I think.
 
"Axial" was the old style semi-turntable heel rossi and look made up until this year, ie, the same binding as the pivot series. Axial2 are the new ones with the forward pressure that don't pivot, identical to the Px12.

ANTs are rarer and more valuable than JPvJs, you'll probably have to throw in some cash.
 
I'm not trying to be a dick, but mounted and skiied on even if it's just once is no longer new, value goes down, and they do sell for 320$ from a shop. But as you say, your deal would vary with condition. If I were you, I'd ask for 400$ with bindings, and use that money to try and buy a pair of ANTs straight up. Just a thought.
 
hmm. I really don't want to ship these. Let's see if the buyer will take a refund plus some money... It's a shitty thing to do, I know, but I'll see if he goes for it.
 
I was retarded and sold them. don't know what I was thinking. I let a guy tell me at a shop that the JP's will be better for me.
 
Hmm...sniff sniff....it's fishy.

Regardless...JD is right, just buy them straight up. And really no shipping?
 
You know, if you want to be a dick and correct someone as to a word's spelling, it'd be cool if you knew what the word was. It's not just a Radiohead song. Hahaha.
 
Hahahahaha. Wait I like you, and it wasn't even that funny.

Just because I don't tell him its some disease that causes a rapid creation of tumor like myxomas...usually in rabbits...dosen't mean I don't know what it is. And no, that bullshit wasn't wikipedia'ed of whatever...we actually discussed it/covered it in a science class last year...

I'm guessing this guy is just a Radiohead fan, not an animal doctor. As am I...You don't need to be such a fucking post-hawk. Take it easy.
 
I actually threw the laugh in at the end to show I wasn't entirely serious... I just think it's funny when people do that, correct people on techincal knowledge they got from popculture. "CORRECTION! It's actually _____. I saw it on a Star Trek episode this one time!"

I wasn't hounding you or anything.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top