WTB: Ski 100cm underfoot or more with bindings

[.SimonB.]

Something i can ski east coast pow on and nothing too destroyed.

 

[MikeTK]

i have line ghetto blasters 131cm.

pretty good condition.

im not sure about bindings with them but i could prob hook you up.

let me know

 

[Love_Wins.]

100cm underfoot?

Damn, apparently someone knows something I don't about the east coast...

 

[.SimonB.]

i might be going to school out west or up in vermont, so i kinda want something to play around with

 

[MikeTK]

ah nevermind. i missed the underfoot and was thinking length.

my bad. sorry i couldn't help

 

[Love_Wins.]

Annnnd... Right over your head.

 

[El_Barto.]

bhahahaha

 

[.SimonB.]

explain, i still dont get it

 

[El_Barto.]

 

[Peach.]

HaHA plus k to you!!!!!!

 

[.SimonB.]

haha, oh fuck, im a dumbass. correction: 100mm 100cm would be stupid correction: not would be, is stupid

 

[Jamestown]

I have a pair of 4frnt STLs that are 183 cm but 84mm waist. You could mount them sideways perhaps?

 

[uni-corn]

Sell you my brand new unmounted 09/10 179 Hellbents and FKS 120's(also brand new, ninja black) with the brakes bent PERFECT for like a trillion or so.

 

[.SimonB.]

sooo jealous, that sounds amazing

 

[uni-corn]

Yup, cost me under $560 for everything.

 

[no_steeze]

i live on the east coast and own 6 pairs of skis, none of which are narrower than 96 underfoot

 

[.SimonB.]

this man got spatulas for the east!!!

 

[no_steeze]

haha no, i got those for sentimental value and trips out west. i plan on never using them here unless mother nature takes a massive dump on the east

and i completely missed the 100cm's deal, i'm an idiot

 

[.SimonB.]

its ok we all have our moments, and i definitely had mine. haha