Would you rather have...

Flo_Rida_2016

Active member
In case you couldn't mix the two which would be ideal...

1. A park with:

-several progressively longer/higher flat rails and flat boxes none of them being over crotch height with decently high lips to them

-maybe 2-5 more interesting features such as a nice flat down flat, a down flat down, rainbow, trap, barrel, down, flat down etc, all of which being rather mellow none being over crotch height with decently high lips to them

Or

2. A park with:

-A 11' tall uprail to gap

-A huge S rail about 4' off the ground,

-That DFD S rail at breckenridge

-A huge transfer set up from 5' tall half rainbow to huge gap to down rail (like at sunday river)

-The huge shit in keystone as seen in real time

-Large downs/ dfd with little to no urban lips.

Id rather have 1 cuz im just learning to get real tech and i think itd be much easier to learn in 1.
 
Well 1 only has rails, and i like jumps too so maybe 2. I like big features.
 
Not saying i could do all of it, but 4ft tall srail sounds fun, and the keystone jumps were baller.
 
neither

#3

a jump line that has super poppy lips with steep landings with high knuckels

35

45

55

65

70
 
hmmm well 1 sounds too small with no jumps,

and 2 seems too big to be able to get technical on the rails...

in between there and im sold.
 
oh in that case i would go 1...i like smaller stuff that i can try more stuff/get tech on..
 
Back
Top