Would you buy this ski

[sander_h]

would you buy a ski that is 125/93/118 in a 179 or bigger with a medium stiffness? What do u think about dimensions?

 

[KravtZ]

ehh idk might be ok for like a pow day but dont think the dimensions would work out that well but i really dont no

r u makin a ski with those dimensions?

 

[steezyjibber]

this is for surface isn't it.

 

[jp_draves]

is surface planning on making a new ski?

 

[Bo_bot9]

120/91/115 would be sick in like a 184

 

[fillup]

i wouldnt

 

[sander_h]

no not surface

 

[albion]

I'm not that fond of a 92 in waist. It's a little to wide for park and way to thin for pow.

 

[Triple_Strum]

it would be okay, VERY similar to the first model of the ARV in both 03/04 and 04/05. They were 125/92/115 in a 185 and had medium to stiff flex. A good all around ski, but a little slow

 

[steezyjibber]

on3p right

 

[Commonwealth]

exactly what i was going to say...if i was going to buy them i would use them as a all-mountain/sometimes park ski

 

[freeski1620]

that sounds like a dope ski, if you made it in like a 193 that would be prime. maybe a little more than medium stifness though. i like the semi smaller waist though, that will be better on hard pack. i would get a ski like that for sure.

 

[artfullydodged]

no.

 

[lt.milo]

sounds good, i would make the flex a bit softer though

 

[13stripes]

kinda weird dementions seems like they should be a touch wider underfoot

 

[hollygrove]

187

133-100-133

(symetrical)

with medium flex

there's a ski i need.

I do not know why it just went into italics

 

[chickenwang]

judging by how his sig changed to on3p skis from w/e it was id have to agree

 

[sander_h]

bump

 

[lt.milo]

nah i doubt these are for on3p. to skinny