miroz Active member Jun 16, 2008 #6 Well, John Symms is on DNA, and its definitely John Symms: http://www.johnsymms.com/journal/?p=23 so I don't know...maybe a limited addition line? Or he was on a different sponsorship then...
Well, John Symms is on DNA, and its definitely John Symms: http://www.johnsymms.com/journal/?p=23 so I don't know...maybe a limited addition line? Or he was on a different sponsorship then...
Burkski Member Jun 16, 2008 #7 i might be scott or someting, but dna dosent release everything the pros wear.
Balto Active member Jun 16, 2008 #8 which is super stupid. they are just loosing money doing that. kids like to wear what there favorite pros wear so they would make alot more if they did
which is super stupid. they are just loosing money doing that. kids like to wear what there favorite pros wear so they would make alot more if they did
K keystoneandbone Member Jun 16, 2008 #9 well i wouldnt say john symms is my favorite pro, but those are sick pants
brenker Active member Jun 16, 2008 #10 Its definintely DNA, no doubt about it. http://www.johnsymms.com/journal/?page_id=14# picture # 3 has the pants, and the right leg has the DNA fish skeleton logo on it. and DNA definintely does not make such a pant....so what im thinking is that he used yellow duct tape to make the left leg bumble bee-ish.
Its definintely DNA, no doubt about it. http://www.johnsymms.com/journal/?page_id=14# picture # 3 has the pants, and the right leg has the DNA fish skeleton logo on it. and DNA definintely does not make such a pant....so what im thinking is that he used yellow duct tape to make the left leg bumble bee-ish.